• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Budget: The big idea? Better accounting for devolution

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Resources · Treasury
  • — 20 Nov, 2017

Photo (cropped): FCO, Flickr, CC

As Philip Hammond makes the final adjustments to his budget statement Tom Lawrence argues for a new public finance regime that gives councils greater freedom to borrow for investment.

The chancellor is looking for a “big idea” for his budget – at least according to The Times last month. In recent years, the government has promised us a “devolution revolution”. That is certainly a big idea.

Some parts of government are now starting to realise that they are not in the best position to solve the individual problems faced by every neighbourhood. They are much more likely to be solved by these neighbourhoods themselves and their elected local representatives.

For example, stimulating a local economy and making it more productive will require a bespoke package of measures based on detailed knowledge and experience of its specific features.

We have seen policies enacted which take us down this path—more than 16 million people in England are now covered by devolution deals; over half of the money spent by local councils on general fund services in 2015-16 was raised from a combination of local taxes and local fees, charges and sales (excluding schools grants and rent allowances and rebates) and this proportion is set to rise.

It would, however, be stretching language to describe this as a “revolution”. Will the chancellor take the measures in this budget to turn this idea into a revolutionary change? If he commits to the proposals in this post, maybe. If you’re reading this post after the budget and this hasn’t happened—well, it’s not too late to engage with him.

Localism

Localist thinking has yet to permeate Whitehall. This is best demonstrated in the budget itself. It associates a departmental expenditure limit (DEL) and an annually managed expenditure (AME) with each department. But these are not just figures for central government—they cover the whole public sector.

For example, when a local authority borrows money to improve an asset, at the moment at which the money is spent, this is added to AME. This is true regardless of whether it borrows from the Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) or from a third party, such as a local building society.

All DEL and AME contribute to the government’s main deficit and debt measures, public sector net borrowing (PSNB) and public sector net debt (PSND). The government is therefore presenting all its local government creditors’ debts as its own—even when they are debts to another lender.

Through the fiscal rules, this means the government is setting its budgetary discipline using figures for the whole public sector. This may have been logical during the regime of credit approvals, but looks anachronistic in an era of growing financial autonomy for local government. (Were budgets and spending review documents to recognise the independence of local authorities and their accountability to their own electorates, they might be laid out a bit more like Denmark’s Budget Outlook. Throughout this document, it is clear when the figures being discussed relate to central government, when they relate to general government and when they relate to local government, and some sections focus solely on central government.)

This is not just a presentational issue—it has consequences, through the fiscal rules. Each time a significant financial freedom is granted to local authorities, there seems to be some kind of caveat or constraint placed on capital expenditure. Even when there was the greatest improvement in the capital finance system for local government, the introduction of prudential borrowing in 2004, it included a reserve power for the government to place limits on the total amount of borrowing across England.

More recent changes have had more immediate constraints. When the housing revenue account (HRA) was reformed, caps were put on borrowing for investing in housing. When business rate retention was introduced, councils could apply to the secretary of state to have one-off, unavoidable and otherwise unaffordable revenue costs treated as capital—but such capitalisation had a national limit of just £100m and came at the expense of revenue support grant being cut. This emergency mechanism has now been abolished.

In addition, councils could not prudently engage in tax increment financing (TIFs)—borrowing for investment on the assumption of future growth in business rates—unless the project were exempt from resets and the levy. Such New Development Deals were limited to £150m in 2012 and only three went ahead.

Accountability

While reforming the government’s primary debt and deficit measures is crucial to freeing up local investment, it is too simplistic to focus exclusively on these quantities. After all, countries can have outwardly similar deficit measures and still have different fiscal control regimes and ways of funding local authority capital expenditure.

Any such reform should be based on principles of local democratic accountability, not just a desire to build more. The importance of this is clear from the fact that a narrow focus on keeping public works from contributing to the deficit lay behind the unsuitable use of PFI for many projects in the last decade.

It should also allow councils greater freedom to invest not just in social housing but also in other asset classes. While there is a pressing need for more housing, local business growth and supporting infrastructure are also crucial to creating sustainable communities.

Any resulting borrowing must be undertaken prudently. The tried-and-tested prudential regime seems a good guarantor of this. We shouldn’t expect a surge to make use of new freedoms, but they could be very useful in unblocking small numbers of important projects which would not otherwise be viable.

To provide a sense of scale, Centre for Cities projected that even if England’s 56 cities were to launch a TIF project the size of that undertaken by Edinburgh—an “unrealistic prospect”—the total annual revenue commitment to service the resulting debt would be just £440m. “This would increase public sector debt by less than 0.5% and represent just two percent of England’s current annual business rates revenues…”*

Similarly, ending the HRA borrowing cap would not mean additional borrowing by every council and would not unlock every local development; as the chancellor has acknowledged, there is no “silver bullet”. But it would be a very handy extra tool in the toolbox.

If the chancellor really wants to be “imaginative” and “think big” on investing for growth and unlocking the potential of every neighbourhood, he needs to grasp this issue. He doesn’t need to spell out the detail now, but he does need to commit to a timetabled programme with clear objectives, based on sound principles.

The Treasury is perfectly capable of orchestrating a reform of the public finances—previous reforms such as the Clear Line of Sight programme and the change from the public sector borrowing requirement (PSBR) to PSNB (public sector net borrowing) demonstrate this. However, it would be wise to work through the detail with all parties affected by this reform, to avoid unforeseen hitches.

There would be considerable advantage to the Treasury in instituting such reform. Focusing on central government expenditure would reduce uncertainty in meeting fiscal targets. It would also reduce the need to broker individual deals with authorities looking for capital freedoms, cutting calls on ministers’ and civil servants’ time.

So, Mr Hammond, please seize this opportunity to bring the public finances into the 21st Century.

Dr Tom Lawrence was until recently a briefings author for the Local Government Information Unit on local government finance.

*Centre for Cities, A Taxing Journey, p13.

Share

You may also like...

  • Developed world short rates and monetary policy Developed world short rates and monetary policy 8 Dec, 2011
  • Welsh LAMS suspended Welsh LAMS suspended 8 Aug, 2013
  • Cash and money: thoughts on the global financial infrastructure under QE Cash and money: thoughts on the global financial infrastructure under QE 2 May, 2012
  • Empty homes funding allocated Empty homes funding allocated 8 Mar, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 19 hours ago

    The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk: Sponsored article: Lauren Sewell examines the prospects for long-term borrowing as Brexit settles and vaccines are deployed against Covid-19. On the 9th October 2019 Whitehall sent… dlvr.it/RqZXCr pic.twitter.com/PzgOZOGQ0k

    Room151 19 hours ago

    ESG in liquidity: Sponsored article: Gavin Haywood looks at the integration of ESG in Federated Hermes’ money market funds. Federated Hermes has over 300 public sector clients invested in our AAA rated money[...] dlvr.it/RqZX5f pic.twitter.com/E87sBXsay8

    Room151 2 days ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 2 days ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 2 days ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 3 days ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 3 days ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 3 days ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 4 days ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 4 days ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 4 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 4 weeks ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

    Room151 4 weeks ago

    Room151’s top stories from a momentous year: 2020 was the year in which local government grappled with Covid-19, funding strains, controversy over borrowing rules and the threat of financial collapse. It has been an exhausting and historic[...] dlvr.it/RnlpZg pic.twitter.com/g3myNyox6J

    Room151 4 weeks ago

    Tracy Bingham: 2020, a year best forgotten but also one of learning: Many will rush to erase 2020 from their memories but, writes Tracy Bingham, there were also many lessons about finance teams, strategic planning and leadership. 2020: A year we’d… dlvr.it/RnlpY2 pic.twitter.com/m7G1krrtCu

    Room151 1 month ago

    Settlement must address ‘precarious’ local government finances: Dan Bates crosses his fingers for “no nasty surprises” in this week’s funding settlement but argues the “bigger prize” is post-Covid financial certainty. Thursday (17 December) should be the… dlvr.it/Rnj9dG pic.twitter.com/KLKjjuBqJE

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB consultation: Big change on the way but there are ‘grey areas’ and opportunities: The consultation on PWLB borrowing has concluded creating a new landscape for funding property acquisition. Our experts look at the implications. Tracie Langley The… dlvr.it/RndRvJ pic.twitter.com/KEqXEBmEfq

    Room151 1 month ago

    2021: Better income outcomes?: Sponsored article: Investors should be mindful of structural challenges posed to income generation as a result of rapid thematic change. Jon Bell looks at the prospects for the coming year.[...] dlvr.it/RndRsw pic.twitter.com/TxVk8aXkMq

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story News Roundup: Northamptonshire’s ‘failure to secure value for money’, Brent appoints LPP, climate change guidance
  • Next story Housing policy risks ‘sting in the tail’ as new HRA freedoms combine with Right to Buy pilot

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK