• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Camden housing development needs private sector to reduce risk

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in Development · Resources · Treasury
  • — 7 Apr, 2016
Photo: Sara, Flickr

Photo: Sara, Flickr

London Borough of Camden is set to bring in private sector help to overcome challenges delivering a programme which uses housing development to fund services.

The council’s Community Investment Programme (CIP) was launched in 2010 aimed at raising £300m to bridge its capital funding gap and cuts from central government grants.

But the council now says that without private sector partnership, it could struggle to meet the programme’s aims within its 15-year timescale.

A report agreed by the council’s cabinet this week said: “Working with external partners has the potential to deliver new CIP schemes without recourse to further HRA borrowing, give Camden access to external innovation and skills and reduce calls on internal resources for delivery.

“A partnership approach would limit the council’s exposure to financial risk on new projects compared to the ‘council as developer’ model.”

However, the report said that working with a private developer would come at a cost. “Any partner will require a return on their investment – and involves relinquishing some control over future projects,” it said.

In addition, finance from partners is likely to be more expensive than council borrowing, the report concluded.

Despite, this, the move is seen as the only way to overcome supply chain problems which are threatening delivery on housing schemes being undertaken as part of the project.

“…developers across all sectors are facing challenges delivering to time and cost due to a shortage of skilled labour across London in a buoyant market – but some private developers may have sufficient market power and flexibility in procurement to manage their supply chain more effectively,” the report said.

The CIP programme aims to build 3,050 homes on council-owned sites, of which 1,400 would be affordable.

It will also invest in capital improvements to schools and children’s centres, existing council housing and other community facilities.

The council said that approved projects are forecast to deliver 2,177 (71%) of the programme’s targeted homes and £259m (66%) of the targeted net capital receipts.

It said that the cost of the schemes had risen due to changes to the scope and design of some schemes in response to stakeholder consultation and higher than anticipated build cost inflation.

However, receipts have increased by 57% due to higher than anticipated house price inflation in Camden.

Camden’s cabinet member for planning and regeneration, Cllr Phil Jones, said the council was to look at further options for funding the community investment programme, including collaboration with external partners to fund the scheme.
He said the programme had already produced 100 new socially rented homes and investment of £51m for schools and children’s centre.
“However, we have identified challenges involved with the programme continuing in its current form, which is why we are now looking at all the options available to us to best fund CIP in the future.”
Get the Room151 Newsletter
Share

You may also like...

  • Finding private sector solutions to the housing crisis 16th Mar, 2022
  • Spending review prompts more calls for long-term funding answers 13th Dec, 2021
  • David Green: Sidestepping the pitfalls of accounting for council-owned companies 14th May, 2021
  • Counting the infrastructure costs for county councils 14th Mar, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 18 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 18 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 3 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 7 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story DCLG declares union ‘scaremongering’ with LGPS claims
  • Next story Treasury Think Tank told DCLG has failed on investment guidance

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares