• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

CIPFA defends ‘huge prize’ in PWLB borrowing debate

0
  • by Gavin Hinks
  • in Blogs · Treasury
  • — 20 Oct, 2020

The future lending terms for local government borrowing has become a sensitive topic. Room151.co.uk brought experts together to explore the issue.

The debate over councils borrowing from PWLB for commercial investment rumbles on. Even as finance chiefs across England await the results of a government consultation, the discussion simmers aways.

In a recent Room151.co.uk webcast CIPFA’s associate director Andrew Burns defended the institute’s stance that borrowing from the PWLB could not be yield only, even if the income is spent on essential services. Borrowing for yield risked forcing central government to withdraw the guidelines which allow councils to invest without asking permission.

The webcast debate followed a Twitter exchange between Room151 and CIPFA chief executive Rob Whiteman over the appropriate use of money borrowed from PWLB. Whiteman described exchanges over “borrowing for yield” as a “dodgy debate”

Meanwhile, finance chiefs cautioned that cuts in central government funding had forced local authorities into new ways of raising funds and any new guidelines on borrowing should allow councils to invest in their “economic areas”, not just within their administrative boundaries.


12th Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum & FDs’ Summit
NOW A VIRTUAL EVENT + ZOOM151 Networking
Jan 21, 22 & 23, 2021


The discussion highlighted just contentious and nuanced the issued of local government borrowing can be. But finance officers are likely to see some form of tightening of the rules.

During the Room151 debate Andrew Burns described local government’s ability to borrow for commercial investment as a “huge prize”, and said it should it should be put at risk by councils investing for any other purpose than “regeneration or place shaping”.

“CIPFA are very supportive of local decision making,” said Burns, “and would want to keep the ability for councils to borrow from PWLB, but if we could focus that on regeneration, placeshaping developing services.

He added: “But I think at its heart, the reasons CIPFA have come out strongly against borrowing for yield only is because that’s taking risks with public money, which should be used for public purpose, not organisational commercial risk and it’s as simple as that.”

Consultation on borrowing from PWLB ran from March until the end of July this year.

It followed a National Audit Office report that raised concerns about the level of borrowing undertaken by local authorities for investment in commercial property. The report found that between2016 and 2019 local authorities has spent £6.6bn on commercial property but 80% of that spend was by 49 out of 352 councils in England.

The study also found that 38% of commercial property bought by councils was outside their boundaries.

Controversy around borrowing was further fuelled in October last year when PWLB rates were raised 100 basis points by HM Treasury in response to increased borrowing.


Room151’s Monthly Online Treasury Briefing

November 27th, 2020
Money market funds and deposit accounts
Register here with a .gov.uk email address


Andrew Hardingham, head of finance at Plymouth City Council, said he believed some councils had been forced down the route of investing for a return to continue funding services after seeing their revenue support grants substantially reduced during the period of austerity from 2010.

His own council, he said, invested in commercial property but in the context of the authority’s local plan.

But he added: “I’m not going pull the wool over people’s eyes, the acquisition of properties is in the context of the local plan, but also in the context that while we are undergoing the transformation, the regeneration of the city, those assets will actually earn some sort of return and some sort of income for us.”

Further nuance was added to the debate by Nikki Bishop, finance chief at Trafford Council in Greater Manchester, who warned that any new guidelines should avoid being overly prescriptive on where councils can invest to achieve their “placemaking”.

She gave the example of Trafford owning a share in Manchester airport, outside the council’s own boundaries but nonetheless important to its resident economic prospects.

Bishop acknowledged that current guidelines in the Prudential Code did not restrict investment within a council’s immediate boundaries, but she added: “It would be very artificial if you said you have to invest only in your own area.” New guidance, she said, would need to be careful in what it means by regeneration in an “economic area”.

Meanwhile, David Green, strategic director at Arlingclose, argued that CIPFA and the government would have to address key definitions that frame illegitimate borrowing. The Prudential Code says borrowing “in advance of need” is ruled out. But Green argues if the “need” in question is cash for spending on services, it’s difficult to see how the definition provides clarity. Andrew Burns conceded the wording may need clarification.

The results of the PWLB consultation are yet to be published. In the meantime the debate is likely to continue.

To see the full discussion go to the Room151 webcast here.

FREE monthly newsletters
Subscribe to Room151 Newsletters

Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
Sign up here with a .gov.uk email address

Room151 Webinars
Visit the Room151 channel

Share

You may also like...

  • Councils face ‘double standard’ in guidance on property investment Councils face ‘double standard’ in guidance on property investment 22 Mar, 2018
  • Devolution poses threat to council credit profiles Devolution poses threat to council credit profiles 4 Jun, 2015
  • Lowering your portfolio’s carbon footprint Lowering your portfolio’s carbon footprint 6 Jul, 2015
  • Solar bonds: The sunny side of alternative investments Solar bonds: The sunny side of alternative investments 17 Jun, 2015

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 23 hours ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 2 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 2 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 3 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 1 week ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Is local government funding “broken”?: Andrew Hardingham looks at the underlying issues that caused more than a third of respondents in the Room151/CCLA treasury survey to say that the funding system for local govenrment is[...] dlvr.it/RsYhsg pic.twitter.com/plNp7Ayys6

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    GameStop: A lesson for LGPS in the risks of short selling: Day traders coordinating their efforts through the social media platform Reddit have not only boosted the stock of US GameStop, but also badly hurt hedge funds engaged in huge bets[...] dlvr.it/RsGdVV pic.twitter.com/NTMC3j6J2u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Room151 panel backs unitary councils and devolution: Bigger isn’t always better when it comes to local government, according to Sir Bob Kerslake, chair of the Peabody Trust, but “ …we need to move to unitary government and[...] dlvr.it/RsFPNv pic.twitter.com/lT4eCi0TmV

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Addressing the long-term impacts of the coronavirus
  • Next story Can local authorities invest for income in a sustainable way?

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK