• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Corporate bonds: is it time you rethought your TMS?

0
  • by David Green
  • in Blogs · David Green · Treasury
  • — 4 Oct, 2012

The second part of my presentation at last week’s Local Authority Treasurer’s Investment Forum focused on the strengths of corporate bonds as investment opportunities for local authorities.  This was followed by a lively panel discussion that included a healthy dose of scepticism from the audience, not surprising as this asset class was only opened up a few months ago for English authorities.

In simple terms, a corporate bond is a loan to a company which can be traded between investors; the borrower remains the same throughout the bond’s life, but the lender can change.  I’m only talking about sterling denominated, investment grade, fixed rate bonds here, although other bond types are available.  And when talking about corporates, we usually mean companies that are not banks – banks do issue a lot of bonds themselves, but they don’t provide the treasurer with anything very different to bank deposits.

So why lend to non-financial companies instead?  Partly it’s a question of diversification – there are fewer and fewer high credit quality banks and building societies out there willing to accept one or two million in sterling at market rates of interest. So rather than keep increasing counterparty limits and leaving yourself ever more exposed to a low probability, high impact credit event, it makes sense to spread your money more widely.  Not putting all your eggs in one basket is a good risk management lesson in any field.

Corporates also tend to be more stable and more predictable than financials, as they deal in real world goods and services, and hold more tangible assets on their balance sheets, so they are easier to analyse.  Banks can only exist if lenders and depositors remain confident in their ability to repay, and confidence can change very quickly – just remember how fast Northern Rock failed after rumours started circulating about its health.  On the other hand, this week’s corporate casualty, JJB Sports, has been in some difficulty for a couple of years, and the ratings agencies and investors have had plenty of time to adjust their positions accordingly.

Banks are different in other ways too.  Yes, they are convenient to use, with money being their main business.  But the planned banking reforms in the UK as a result of the Vickers Report will see some of the advantages of financial institutions as counterparties exchanged for some new disadvantages.  For example, banks will be simplified and required to have resolution plans in place, to stop the need for taxpayer bailouts because it’s too difficult to let banks default.  And part of the regulator’s resolution tools will be the bail-in, that is forcing haircuts onto long-term investors, possibly including today’s existing investors.  Tomorrow’s banks may be safer for the retail depositor and the taxpayer, but it will be the wholesale investor who takes all the risk.

One good question at last week’s forum was “how would we select which corporate bonds to buy?” Well, it’s not that different from selecting which bank deposits to make.  Counterparty selection is critical, of course, and all the usual tools of credit ratings, CDS, share and bond prices, financial statement analysis, etc are available.  You may be surprised at how low some corporate CDS are, especially compared with similarly rated banks.  Selecting which maturities of bonds are suitable comes down to your medium term cash flow forecast and your approach to interest rate risk management, as with any other investment.  Any decent treasury advisor should be able to help you through these areas.

But many authorities will see the value in using a pooled corporate bond fund.  In exchange for a management fee of 0.20% to 0.50%, someone with much better experience and resources will make the buying and selling decisions for you.  And with the worst performing of 109 sterling corporate bond funds on Citywire still returning 2.5% in the last year (the top fund made 19.5%) you should be more than adequately compensated for taking your treasury management in a new direction.

Share

You may also like...

  • Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy 11th Jan, 2021
  • Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation? 8th Apr, 2021
  • A year in the life of an s151: ‘We delivered unbelievable things’ 16th Dec, 2021
  • Impact Awards: A week to go before deadline 22nd Apr, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 20 hours ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 20 hours ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 20 hours ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 1 day ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 2 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 2 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 2 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 2 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 3 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 1 week ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 1 week ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Treasurer’s reflections – Q3: Catch 22
  • Next story Rachel Musson on treasury, Shropshire’s ip&e and the funding challenge for rural councils

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares