• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override

    August 12, 2022

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Crystal balls required

0
  • by David Green
  • in Blogs · David Green · Treasury
  • — 20 Jan, 2012

It’s time to get the crystal balls out.  English local authorities with housing responsibilities have a one-off opportunity to plan the shape of their long-term debt portfolios, either because they have significant sums to borrow or because they are dividing up existing loans into General Fund and HRA pools.

The CLG valuation model provides a 30 year business plan, which authorities will be adapting to include their latest forecasts for income and expenditure.  So it’s no use consulting short-term forecasters like the Institute for Fiscal Studies or even the Met Office.  Treasury managers really need the foresight of Nostradamus or Cassandra of Troy to build a perfect plan for the long-term.

In the absence of such certainty over the future, debt portfolios should be designed with risk management very much in mind.  Where future cash flows are relatively certain, treasury risks can be minimised by having loans that mature when cash is available to repay them.  Too little cash will leave the authority exposed to the risks of liquidity shortages and rising interest rates, while too much cash can leave it exposed to the risks of low interest rates and credit defaults.  And don’t forget that credit loss impairments can only be charged to the General Fund, not the HRA.

As you look further into the future, and uncertainty increases, treasury risks can be lowered by building in some flexibility to the portfolio.  For example, PWLB variable rate loans can be repaid without penalty on any reset date, a big advantage over fixed rate loans.  Alternatively, bank revolving credit facilities, which operate like call accounts in reverse, provide another way to keep borrowing aligned with funding needs.

A degree of modelling and scenario testing is therefore required, noting that the uncertainty around many of the variables is not symmetrical.  For example, there is a greater risk that future revenue and capital expenditure will be higher than in the business plan, than it being lower.  This could be due to building materials inflation, staff pension costs, new properties being built, the impact of benefit localisation or future governments raiding surpluses, etc.  And there is clearly much more scope for future interest rates to be higher than the current market consensus.

But risk management needn’t be the only concern.  Sometimes when you see a bargain it should be grabbed with both hands.  The ability to borrow 50 year loans at 3.25% is an opportunity we are unlikely to see ever again, and if the authority can demonstrate that it will have a borrowing need for the very long term, either HRA or General Fund, a longer-dated debt maturity profile should be seriously considered.  Scenario testing will demonstrate whether the risks of such an approach are offset by the long-term cost savings it presents.

David Green is the Head of Sterling Consultancy Services, a provider of treasury management advice to local authorities and other not for profit organisations.  This is the writer’s personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice.  It should not be relied upon when making investment decisions.

Share

You may also like...

  • What lies ahead for UK markets? 2nd Feb, 2022
  • What are bond markets telling us? 25th Apr, 2022
  • Room151’s 10th Anniversary: A treasury decade that saw borrowing double and investments transformed 25th Nov, 2021
  • MOTB speakers and attendees call for permanent IFRS 9 override 27th May, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 2 days ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 3 days ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 4 days ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 4 days ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 5 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 1 week ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 1 week ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Nick Vickers on fighting hedge funds, grasping the nettle & pension fund reform
  • Next story Does QE have to mean inflation?

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares