• Home
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Conference
  • TMS Links
  • Calendar
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • LGPS infrastructure partnership invests £1.8bn in renewables

    December 12, 2019

  • Brunel appoints global high alpha managers

    December 11, 2019

  • City of London completes £250m debt deal

    December 11, 2019

  • Mystery bidder appointed on £250m waste contract

    December 11, 2019

  • Investors withdraw from property fund

    December 11, 2019

  • Highland councillors back tourist tax

    December 11, 2019

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Jobs

David Green: MiFID II – deadline looms for action

0
  • by David Green
  • in Blogs · David Green · Treasury
  • — 19 Dec, 2016
David Green, Arlingclose

David Green, Arlingclose

The way that local authorities access financial services will change in January 2018 as a result of the European Union’s second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II).

If the current proposals are adopted, many local authorities will find it more difficult and/or more expensive to use the services of banks, advisers, brokers and fund managers. We therefore strongly recommend that local authorities reply to question 16 of the Financial Conduct Authority’s consultation, which closes on 4th January 2017.

Among many other changes, MiFID II seeks to provide additional protections to local authority investors due to supposed “limits in their ability … to appreciate the risk of their investments”.

And although we’ve voted to leave the EU, MiFID II will still be implemented here, not least because UK firms will wish to continue providing financial services across Europe, and so will need to comply with equivalent regulations.

Retail

Unfortunately, the additional protections will not be anything useful like exemption from bank bail-ins, or eligibility for the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, as those are ruled by separate EU directives.

Instead, the “protection” comprises classing all local authorities as “retail clients”, the same as individual investors. This could mean completing forms on your incomings and outgoings, questionnaires on risk appetite, reading notices about firms’ complaints procedures and reams of other paperwork, taking extra staff time for both you and the financial services provider, which means they will inevitably charge you more. In fact many firms refuse to deal with retail clients at all, due to the significant administrative burden.

There is a small glimmer of hope though. Local authority retail clients will be allowed to opt to be “professional clients” and retain their existing status, providing they meet certain criteria to be set by the FCA in the UK. They have been engaging with local authority stakeholders on this subject since early 2012, culminating in their current consultation.

Unfortunately, during this time they have developed some serious misunderstandings, for example that parish councils hold an average investment balance of £10m, and that all local authorities administer a pension fund, and they are setting the new rules based on these flawed beliefs.

The FCA therefore intends to rule that only local authorities with investment balances above £15m will be allowed to opt up to be a professional client and continue to access financial services as they do now.

While this is certainly high enough to meet the FCA’s aim of excluding parish councils, the government’s own data shows that it would also exclude around a quarter of principal authorities, including some with multi-billion pound budgets, but sensible use of internal borrowing to keep investment balances low.

In addition, local authorities will only be allowed to opt up if they are already familiar with the investments they wish to make. This can be demonstrated either by transacting “on the relevant market at an average frequency of 10 per quarter over the previous four quarters” (a complicated way of saying 40 times a year), or by the treasury manager having “worked in the financial sector for at least one year in a professional position which requires knowledge of the transactions or services envisaged.”

Form filling

Now, I don’t know about you, but I don’t know many local authority treasury managers who used to work in the financial sector dealing with million pound investment portfolios. And while you might make 40 money market fund transactions a year, I doubt you make anywhere near that number in property funds or corporate bonds.

So, the FCA is going to resign you a life of form filling, signing to say you understand that “your home may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage” and that “the value of your investments may go down as well as up” just as if your authority was an individual with a few thousands to invest rather than the largest employer in the area with many millions.

Unless, that is, as many authorities as possible reply to the FCA consultation and get them to apply more sensible opting up criteria instead.

One obvious solution would be to apply the same criteria to local authorities that they do to companies and base it on their financial statements.

Private sector organisations are professional clients if they have at least two of a €40m annual income, €20m of assets and €2m in reserves, the so-called “large undertakings” criteria. Using this for local authorities too would enable districts, counties and unitaries to remain professional clients, but meet the FCA’s aim of treating most small parish councils as retail clients.

Another solution would be for local authorities to borrow extra money to keep their investment balances artificially high and to frequently trade their bond and pooled fund holdings. According to the FCA proposal, that would turn you into a professional. But I don’t think anyone else considers those activities to be the hallmarks of professional treasury management. A robust response to the consultation is therefore in order.

The FCA consultation can be accessed here in chapter 4, and closes on Wednesday 4th January 2017.

David Green is Client Director at Arlingclose Limited. This is the writer’s personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice.

Share

You may also like...

  • Urban myths: variable rate loans, MMFs & tradable instruments Urban myths: variable rate loans, MMFs & tradable instruments 20 Apr, 2012
  • Jackie Shute: A glance back in time through the CIPFA Treasury Management Risk Study 30 Nov, 2016
  • Richard Harbord: We have a clear strategic process…except for all the uncertainty 15 Nov, 2017
  • Fund raiders 11 Dec, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Court rejects NHS trusts’ claim for millions in business rates relief: A judge yesterday threw out a claim by 17 NHS trusts that they are charities and should receive millions of pounds of business rates relief. Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation[...] dlvr.it/RL8F7D pic.twitter.com/fxt6Sor3Q7

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Authorities turn away from PWLB in favour of borrowing from peers: Councils borrowed just £80m through the Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) during the first full month since the Treasury’s rate rise, a mere 4% of August’s total. Just two authorities[...] dlvr.it/RL8F57 pic.twitter.com/zIOf1KlNpc

    Room 151 4 days ago

    County introduces new rules after £9.1m funds gaffe: A report to Hertfordshire’s most recent audit committee meeting said the “treasury control failure” had come to light in August, one day after the multi-million-pound redemption was not received.… dlvr.it/RL5DP0 pic.twitter.com/6LvY71zUew

    Room 151 4 days ago

    News just in - #WorkingtonWoman is believed to represent roughly half the electorate in Workington.

    Room 151 5 days ago

    LGPS urged to put the ‘social’ back into ESG: LGPS committee members and managers have been asked to elevate the importance of the “S” in ESG (environmental, social and governance) to help protect workers’ rights as the world confronts[...] dlvr.it/RL1c9p pic.twitter.com/xv590d3qm8

    Room 151 5 days ago

    Room 151’s top 10 news stories of 2019 room151.co.uk/treasury/room-… #localgov

    Room 151 6 days ago

    Room 151’s top news stories of 2019: As an eventful year for local authority treasurers draws to a close, Room 151 takes a look at the top 10 stories from the sector during 2019. 10. Spending watchdog[...] dlvr.it/RKy49q

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Council files £130m claim against PFI contractor for post-Grenfell estate costs: London Borough of Camden is suing a former PFI partner and its main subcontractors for £130m for costs relating to the evacuation of one of its housing estates the week[...] dlvr.it/RKkR8C pic.twitter.com/zIfQcikMjq

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Review highlights ongoing financial management issues at Northamptonshire: Northamptonshire County Council’s new section 151 officer should draw up plans to repatriate powers from government commissioners amid ongoing problems with financial management,… dlvr.it/RKjLkN pic.twitter.com/tQIxMDawQV

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Richard Harbord: The local government settlement is a ‘fudge’ and a ‘muddle’
  • Next story James Bevan: Global growth outlook for 2017

© Copyright 2019 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK