• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’

    August 15, 2022

  • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override

    August 12, 2022

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Fitch draws up ‘what if’ scenarios for MMFs

0
  • by Jo Tura
  • in Treasury
  • — 12 Jul, 2012

Ratings agency Fitch has constructed three ‘what if’ scenarios for money market funds, analysing their resilience and stability.

While the agency maintains as a base case that the Eurozone will “muddle through” the debt crisis and retain currency union, with no country leaving the Euro, it has described the what ifs of: exit by one peripheral country; disorderly exit with contagion; and Eurozone break up and currency re-denominations.

In the first scenario, of one country exiting the single currency, Fitch hypothesises that the AAAmmf-rated European money market funds are resilient and would continue with the same rating as they are not directly exposed to the PIIGS countries. Funds had an average of 70% invested in core European (as opposed to peripheral) countries as of May.

Should the exit of one peripheral country cause a sharp deterioration more generally there would be an impact on the credit profiles of money market funds, which are still exposed to core European banks (which could see downgrades). A reduced investment universe would also follow. However the chief problem would be liquidity. In a deteriorating credit environment, Fitch said, investors would likely swap out of money market funds for the greater safety of treasury funds or direct T-bill investments.

“Yet MMFs are currently better positioned than in the immediate aftermath of the 2008 crisis to face large scale redemption requests,” the analysis noted. “Most Fitch-rated European MMFs hold around 40%-50% (vs. 25%-30% in H1-08) of their portfolios in assets maturing in less than a week and maintain short average portfolio maturities (weighted average life (WAL) at 45 days on average).”

In the second scenario, of disorderly exit with material contagion to banks and core Eurozone countries, a shutdown of interbank markets could affect the liquidity of MMFs. A flight to quality could cause bank runs, capital flight and loss of government market access. Money market funds with less “well-resourced sponsors” could see redemption restrictions imposed either by sponsors or by regulators trying to protect remaining investors and avoid forced selling. Funds which were unable to repay redeeming investors in a short period of time would be put on Rating Watch Negative or downgraded.

Fitch’s third scenario is of partial or full Eurozone break-up. In the case of partial break-up the agency suggests that redenomination risk is remote because funds aren’t exposed to peripheral countries. In a full break up though, both redenomination and transferability risks could be an issue. “The multiple implications including legal and operational considerations are difficult to estimate as they largely depend on how institutions would operationally organize a dismantling of the eurozone,” said the analysis, emphasising that it considers demise of the Euro “highly unlikely”.

Share

You may also like...

  • Investors ‘potentially damaging housing business models’, MOTB attendees told 28th Mar, 2022
  • In praise of the Liability Benchmark 9th May, 2022
  • Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy 11th Jan, 2021
  • Digital infrastructure: The fourth industrial revolution 23rd Nov, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’
    • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override
    • EAPF criticised for water company investments
    • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy
    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 days ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 4 days ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 5 days ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 6 days ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 6 days ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 1 week ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Gilts offering negative real returns
  • Next story Murray Collins on TIF funding the Ravenscraig development

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares