• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

HSBC dominates Counterparty Confidence Survey

1
  • by Editor
  • in Treasury
  • — 19 Jun, 2012

Thanks to all those who took part in our recent survey designed to measure confidence in a given list of counterparties and willingness to place cash with those organisations, either directly or via a sterling denominated money market fund.

45 finance professionals, largely from local authority treasury and/or LGPS functions, completed the survey and while the results are far from scientific, we think they reveal some interesting attitudes.

Respondents were asked to rank 24 different counterparties from 1 to 5. 1 indicated no confidence at all in the organisation and a total unwillingness to place cash with it. 5 indicated the polar opposite. We’ve added up the total scores of each counterparty and divided their overall score by the number of respondents to come up with an Average Confidence Rating (ACR). So an ACR of 5 would be the highest possible score and 1 the lowest.

Unsurprisingly, the UK high-street banks were the biggest winners by some distance with HSBC recording an ACR of 4.75. Nobody rated the bank lower than a 4 and 75% of local authorities awarded it a 5. It was streets ahead of most of the banks in our list and was comfortably ranked higher than both Lloyds TSB and RBS, who finished the survey with ACRs of 3.93 and 3.86, respectively.

Measure of confidence in and willingness to place cash with HSBC. Counterparty Confidence Survey Q2 2012 (44 Respondents)

Santander (UK), although thought by Moody’s to be in a healthier position than its parent, is clearly suffering by association to the Spanish crisis and, of course, its recent downgrade. 41.9% of local authorities surveyed would definitely not place cash with the bank and an ACR of 2.25 put Santander (UK) well below other UK banks, using our ranking system.

Perhaps this says more about the trend for local authority treasurers to manage the risk to their organisations than it does about the credit worthiness of the bank itself. Arguably nobody will win any prizes for imaginative treasury management that yields a few extra basis points but the risk of being in a UK bank with a Spanish parent that blows-up, however unlikely that is, is apparently not a risk worth taking. Opportunities may of course be going begging though.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top-10 ranked counterparties from a selection of 24 banks from UK, Europe and Australia*. Respondents were asked to rate banks according to their confidence in them and willingness to place cash with them. Counterparty Confidence Survey Q2 2012 (44 Respondents)

Banks outside the UK were not highly ranked – again, perhaps unsurprisingly for a survey undertaken largely by UK local authorities. It is however worth reiterating that respondents were asked to measure their willingness to place cash with banks either directly or via a sterling denominated money market fund – so currency was not really an issue here.

Also, many of these counterparties are to be found on the lending lists of money market funds that local authorities are already investing in. So while some of our respondents are possibly outsourcing risk management to pooled fund providers, and indeed placing cash via them into some of the counterparties listed in our survey, local authority confidence in those same counterparties is notably low. That may simply be because our respondents are not money market fund investors. We should have asked!

Of the 15 foreign banks listed in our survey (from France, Germany, Scandinavia, Netherlands and Australia), only two of them (National Australia Bank and Commonwealth Bank Australia) received more than one vote of 5 from 45 different respondents and their combined ACR (the average of the 15 Average Confidence Ratings) was just 2.21.

However, when asked which counterparties respondents would have given a ‘5’ to, had they been listed in the survey, 17 different respondents cited over 25 foreign banks, some of them more than once (particularly the Canadian ones). That’s a lot of confidence in a lot of banks.

Was this difference simply because we listed a group of ‘riskier banks’ in the survey or is it perhaps indicative of a behavioural trend which demands confidence in the institutions you invest in and a lack thereof in the ones you don’t! It’s difficult to tell from our modest survey but hopefully there’s some food for thought there. Thanks again to all those who took part.

*The banks that featured in the survey, in alphabetical order, were: Barclays, BNP Paribas, Britannia Building Society, Commerzbank, Commonwealth Bank (Australia), Credit Agricole, Danske Bank, Deutsche Bank, DnB Nor, HSBC, ING Bank, Landesbank Baden-Württemberg, Landesbanken Berlin, Lloyds TSB, National Australia Bank, Nationwide Building Society, Nordea Bank, RBS, Santander (UK), SEB, Societe Generale, Standard Chartered Bank, Swedbank, Yorkshire Building Society

———————————————————————————————————————————————
The Local Authority Treasurers’ Investment Forum September 25th, 2012, London Stock Exchange
———————————————————————————————————————————————

 

Share

You may also like...

  • James Bevan: Brexit and states of confusion James Bevan: Brexit and states of confusion 20 Jun, 2016
  • Supply Decline Raises Challenges for Money Market Funds Says Moody’​s Supply Decline Raises Challenges for Money Market Funds Says Moody’​s 25 Oct, 2011
  • Stephen Fitzgerald: Local government can emerge from the post-pandemic world transformed 18 May, 2020
  • Councils should argue the case for commercial property investment Councils should argue the case for commercial property investment 14 Sep, 2017

1 Comment

  1. Cashperform says:
    2012/06/20 at 09:11

    Totally agree with your conclusions and although it was a rather ‘obvious’ survey it is interesting to note how ‘confidence’ is the byword for a safe haven for your cash. However confidence can be misplaced if based on ‘subjective’ financial numbers that are used by the credit agencies to rate/rank organisations. Hence we focus on the underlying metrics that ensure your cash is safe at any point in time.CashPerform assists treasurers to establish such metrics simply and quickly.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 15 hours ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 1 day ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 1 day ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 2 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 1 week ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Is local government funding “broken”?: Andrew Hardingham looks at the underlying issues that caused more than a third of respondents in the Room151/CCLA treasury survey to say that the funding system for local govenrment is[...] dlvr.it/RsYhsg pic.twitter.com/plNp7Ayys6

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    GameStop: A lesson for LGPS in the risks of short selling: Day traders coordinating their efforts through the social media platform Reddit have not only boosted the stock of US GameStop, but also badly hurt hedge funds engaged in huge bets[...] dlvr.it/RsGdVV pic.twitter.com/NTMC3j6J2u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Room151 panel backs unitary councils and devolution: Bigger isn’t always better when it comes to local government, according to Sir Bob Kerslake, chair of the Peabody Trust, but “ …we need to move to unitary government and[...] dlvr.it/RsFPNv pic.twitter.com/lT4eCi0TmV

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Manchester “not the enemy”
  • Next story How do you solve a problem like the Euro?

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.