• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Is Plan A Working?

0
  • by Editor
  • in Interviews · Treasury
  • — 24 Oct, 2011

With economic foreboding reaching fever-pitch again in recent months, we asked two of the UK’s leading commentators on the economy to give us their take on quite how bad things are and what it all might mean for local authority cash managers. Starting with home, and “Is Plan-A Working”, we spoke to Philip Booth and Steven Bell.

Steven Bell is a Director and global-macro portfolio manager with the London-based fund manager, GLC Ltd. Before joining GLC he was Chief Economist with Deutsche Asset Managament and prior to that an advisor to the UK Treasury.

Prof Philip Booth is Editorial and Programme Director at the IEA and professor of insurance and risk management at Cass Business School, City University. Philip has written widely on pensions, social insurance and financial regulation and was formerly an advisor on financial stability issues at the Bank of England.

Room151: Is Plan A working?

Steven Bell (SB): Yes, for three reasons. Firstly, markets regard our deficit-reduction plan as credible. Secondly, a Plan B that involved a fiscal relaxation big enough to make a meaningful difference to the economy would leave us with a manifestly unsustainable fiscal position. Thirdly, we have achieved the maximum benefits in terms of low yields and a stable but weaker exchange rate so there is little to be gained from a Plan A+ with an even tighter policy

Philip Booth (PB): To the extent that Plan A was designed to get the government deficit under control and stabilise national debt, it is working. To the extent that it was supposed to be reviewing the functions of government so that we can have lower levels of spending and taxation going forwards, it has been a
failure. Spending will be rising over the coming years and real spending is being cut by less than one per cent a year. We are not going to have the radical reform we need in many areas to ensure a much more effective welfare, education and health system – with the possible exception of education. In these respects, the government will leave much to be done in 2015 and an opportunity has been missed.

R151: If we’re going to have another round or rounds of quantitative easing, what should the Bank of England spend the money on?

SB: The Bank of England feels reluctant to buy anything but gilts and has eschewed ‘credit easing’. I think
they are correct in this regard but the Treasury rather than the Bank of England should intervene in these areas (I’m sceptical of their ability to avoid wasting public money in this regard).

PB: There are only two choices. The central bank could buy government bonds or private sector instruments. Without question, I believe that the central bank should do the former. The central bank should not be taking private sector investment risk onto its limited balance sheet and is not in a position to distinguish between good and bad risks. Once the newly-created money is in the hands of private sector institutions that have sold the gilts to the Bank of England, they can choose how that money is reinvested. It is through that –indirect – mechanism that private sector investment is supposed to be stimulated. Whether another round of quantitative easing was justified is another matter – however, I strongly believe that such quantitative easing should focus on government debt purchases when it happens.

R151: Do you see a conflict between the need for growth and deficit reduction?

SB: It’s partly a question of growth today v. growth tomorrow. Expansionary fiscal policy today mandates contractionary fiscal policy tomorrow. However, when the threat is one of sustainability, a failure to address the deficit today can reduce growth today and tomorrow. In reality we still have a trade-off but, as argued above, there is little to be gained from easing off on the brakes now.

PB: There is no conflict. The evidence suggests that open economies on floating exchange rates with well-developed financial markets and a high level of indebtedness do not suffer a loss of national income if there is a reduction in government spending – this is true even in the relatively short run. Britain ticks all those boxes. Government spending crowds out private sector spending and that effect is especially rapid
and substantial in the case of the UK because capital inflows from abroad tend to raise the exchange rate. Once we get up to high levels of indebtedness, confidence can disintegrate and consumers rein in spending in anticipation of future tax increases.

The evidence from previous recessions in the UK and elsewhere corroborates this point. From the early
1930s to the early 1980s, we failed to spend our way out of recession when we tried and did not delay the end of recession when we followed conservative fiscal policies.

There is an additional problem in the case of the UK. We have probably reached our taxable capacity. Increases in government spending – if followed by increases in taxation – have a second-round impact on growth because of the effect on the supply side of the economy and on entrepreneurship. We have reached a dangerous point in terms of the size of the state in Britain and we will not delay recovery through the modest proposed spending reductions. I am nervous, though, about the sequencing of policy. Tax increases do, as noted above, affect the supply-side of the economy. It would have been better to reduce government spending first and then increase taxes only if necessary. Instead, the government has decided to reverse this approach and the tax increases will have affected growth. It would have been better if more weight had been put on spending cuts in the deficit reduction programme or – as a minimum – if spending cuts had come before tax increases.

R151: If you were a local authority assessing counterparty risk which banks would you be keeping a close eye on?

SB: Answering this question in reverse: a  UK local authority can hardly be blamed for having exposure across a range of large UK banks or shortish-dated exposure to AAA rated entities. That may be highly restrictive but yes, keep your eyes on the rest, and indeed the above.

PB: No Comment

R151: Given the great uncertainty surrounding the European and global economies, what would your advice be to local authority cash managers?

SB: My advice, related to the above, is to focus on avoiding disaster. If you take risk, you won’t be rewarded if it works out well, but you may be punished if it doesn’t. Act accordingly.

PB: Diversify, monitor counter-party risk and monitor counter-parties of counter-parties.

Share

You may also like...

  • Three regulatory risk challenges for treasury managers 31st Jan, 2022
  • A year in the life of an s151: ‘We delivered unbelievable things’ 16th Dec, 2021
  • 12 days of Christmas messages from the section 151 officer 16th Dec, 2021
  • Exploring the hydrogen spectrum: The future’s white 27th Sep, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 8 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 8 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Pros & Cons of Sharing Treasury Services
  • Next story Supply Decline Raises Challenges for Money Market Funds Says Moody’​s

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares