• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Is Plan A Working?

0
  • by Editor
  • in Interviews · Treasury
  • — 24 Oct, 2011

With economic foreboding reaching fever-pitch again in recent months, we asked two of the UK’s leading commentators on the economy to give us their take on quite how bad things are and what it all might mean for local authority cash managers. Starting with home, and “Is Plan-A Working”, we spoke to Philip Booth and Steven Bell.

Steven Bell is a Director and global-macro portfolio manager with the London-based fund manager, GLC Ltd. Before joining GLC he was Chief Economist with Deutsche Asset Managament and prior to that an advisor to the UK Treasury.

Prof Philip Booth is Editorial and Programme Director at the IEA and professor of insurance and risk management at Cass Business School, City University. Philip has written widely on pensions, social insurance and financial regulation and was formerly an advisor on financial stability issues at the Bank of England.

Room151: Is Plan A working?

Steven Bell (SB): Yes, for three reasons. Firstly, markets regard our deficit-reduction plan as credible. Secondly, a Plan B that involved a fiscal relaxation big enough to make a meaningful difference to the economy would leave us with a manifestly unsustainable fiscal position. Thirdly, we have achieved the maximum benefits in terms of low yields and a stable but weaker exchange rate so there is little to be gained from a Plan A+ with an even tighter policy

Philip Booth (PB): To the extent that Plan A was designed to get the government deficit under control and stabilise national debt, it is working. To the extent that it was supposed to be reviewing the functions of government so that we can have lower levels of spending and taxation going forwards, it has been a
failure. Spending will be rising over the coming years and real spending is being cut by less than one per cent a year. We are not going to have the radical reform we need in many areas to ensure a much more effective welfare, education and health system – with the possible exception of education. In these respects, the government will leave much to be done in 2015 and an opportunity has been missed.

R151: If we’re going to have another round or rounds of quantitative easing, what should the Bank of England spend the money on?

SB: The Bank of England feels reluctant to buy anything but gilts and has eschewed ‘credit easing’. I think
they are correct in this regard but the Treasury rather than the Bank of England should intervene in these areas (I’m sceptical of their ability to avoid wasting public money in this regard).

PB: There are only two choices. The central bank could buy government bonds or private sector instruments. Without question, I believe that the central bank should do the former. The central bank should not be taking private sector investment risk onto its limited balance sheet and is not in a position to distinguish between good and bad risks. Once the newly-created money is in the hands of private sector institutions that have sold the gilts to the Bank of England, they can choose how that money is reinvested. It is through that –indirect – mechanism that private sector investment is supposed to be stimulated. Whether another round of quantitative easing was justified is another matter – however, I strongly believe that such quantitative easing should focus on government debt purchases when it happens.

R151: Do you see a conflict between the need for growth and deficit reduction?

SB: It’s partly a question of growth today v. growth tomorrow. Expansionary fiscal policy today mandates contractionary fiscal policy tomorrow. However, when the threat is one of sustainability, a failure to address the deficit today can reduce growth today and tomorrow. In reality we still have a trade-off but, as argued above, there is little to be gained from easing off on the brakes now.

PB: There is no conflict. The evidence suggests that open economies on floating exchange rates with well-developed financial markets and a high level of indebtedness do not suffer a loss of national income if there is a reduction in government spending – this is true even in the relatively short run. Britain ticks all those boxes. Government spending crowds out private sector spending and that effect is especially rapid
and substantial in the case of the UK because capital inflows from abroad tend to raise the exchange rate. Once we get up to high levels of indebtedness, confidence can disintegrate and consumers rein in spending in anticipation of future tax increases.

The evidence from previous recessions in the UK and elsewhere corroborates this point. From the early
1930s to the early 1980s, we failed to spend our way out of recession when we tried and did not delay the end of recession when we followed conservative fiscal policies.

There is an additional problem in the case of the UK. We have probably reached our taxable capacity. Increases in government spending – if followed by increases in taxation – have a second-round impact on growth because of the effect on the supply side of the economy and on entrepreneurship. We have reached a dangerous point in terms of the size of the state in Britain and we will not delay recovery through the modest proposed spending reductions. I am nervous, though, about the sequencing of policy. Tax increases do, as noted above, affect the supply-side of the economy. It would have been better to reduce government spending first and then increase taxes only if necessary. Instead, the government has decided to reverse this approach and the tax increases will have affected growth. It would have been better if more weight had been put on spending cuts in the deficit reduction programme or – as a minimum – if spending cuts had come before tax increases.

R151: If you were a local authority assessing counterparty risk which banks would you be keeping a close eye on?

SB: Answering this question in reverse: a  UK local authority can hardly be blamed for having exposure across a range of large UK banks or shortish-dated exposure to AAA rated entities. That may be highly restrictive but yes, keep your eyes on the rest, and indeed the above.

PB: No Comment

R151: Given the great uncertainty surrounding the European and global economies, what would your advice be to local authority cash managers?

SB: My advice, related to the above, is to focus on avoiding disaster. If you take risk, you won’t be rewarded if it works out well, but you may be punished if it doesn’t. Act accordingly.

PB: Diversify, monitor counter-party risk and monitor counter-parties of counter-parties.

Share

You may also like...

  • Solar bonds: The sunny side of alternative investments Solar bonds: The sunny side of alternative investments 17 Jun, 2015
  • Warwickshire’s Phil Triggs enters Room151 Warwickshire’s Phil Triggs enters Room151 15 Dec, 2011
  • James Bevan: The Fed and ECB’s divergent paths James Bevan: The Fed and ECB’s divergent paths 10 Dec, 2015
  • DCLG faces calls to clarify guidance over borrowing for property investment DCLG faces calls to clarify guidance over borrowing for property investment 23 Nov, 2017

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 15 hours ago

    FDs’ Summit experts defend councils as MPs label property investment ‘risky’: As Room151’s FDs’ Summit conference explores local government’s investment in commercial property MPs once again lable it a “significant risk to government”. Once again MPs… dlvr.it/Rr7lZx pic.twitter.com/jPvcZjDAS4

    Room151 24 hours ago

    Global macro outlook: Virus versus vaccine: Sponsored article: Salman Ahmed argues monetary policy, a global vaccine rollout and fiscal stimulus are likely to put “upward pressure” on bond yields. Much like the latter half of 2020,[...] dlvr.it/Rr60nt pic.twitter.com/qsymBWmKmV

    Room151 2 days ago

    ‘Chasing yield’ not the best strategy as negative rates loom: Recent speculation that the UK may be heading toward negative interest rates prompts questions for treasury officers managing local authority funds at LATIF. Speculation is rife that the UK… dlvr.it/Rr3Mrj pic.twitter.com/wtxYAB20PO

    Room151 4 days ago

    Will new public procurement rules offer the best commercial results?: The government has issued a green paper on reforming procurement rules. Helen Randall and Rebecca Rees examine the proposals and argue they may not go far enough. The Cabinet… dlvr.it/Rqtw6T pic.twitter.com/9GiVTkL08U

    Room151 1 week ago

    The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk: Sponsored article: Lauren Sewell examines the prospects for long-term borrowing as Brexit settles and vaccines are deployed against Covid-19. On the 9th October 2019 Whitehall sent… dlvr.it/RqZXCr pic.twitter.com/PzgOZOGQ0k

    Room151 1 week ago

    ESG in liquidity: Sponsored article: Gavin Haywood looks at the integration of ESG in Federated Hermes’ money market funds. Federated Hermes has over 300 public sector clients invested in our AAA rated money[...] dlvr.it/RqZX5f pic.twitter.com/E87sBXsay8

    Room151 1 week ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 1 week ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 1 week ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

    Room151 1 month ago

    Room151’s top stories from a momentous year: 2020 was the year in which local government grappled with Covid-19, funding strains, controversy over borrowing rules and the threat of financial collapse. It has been an exhausting and historic[...] dlvr.it/RnlpZg pic.twitter.com/g3myNyox6J

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Pros & Cons of Sharing Treasury Services
  • Next story Supply Decline Raises Challenges for Money Market Funds Says Moody’​s

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK