• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’

    August 15, 2022

  • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override

    August 12, 2022

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

James Bevan: ECB and the euro

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in James Bevan · Treasury
  • — 26 Oct, 2015
James-Bevan-official-photo-520

James Bevan

Over the course of his prepared comments during last week’s monetary policy statement, Mario Draghi, president of the European Central Bank, explicitly stated that credit conditions were improving in Euroland but at the same time he held out the prospect of yet more QE before the end of the year.

Skipping the implied inconsistency in this statement, actually there’s scant evidence of improving credit growth, with household sector credit growth stuck at the same 1.6% annualized rate for the last year or more, while the volume of bank lending that is outstanding to the non-financial corporate sector is in fact falling.

Even if we include corporate bond issuance, there’s been no net increase in corporate sector borrowing in Euroland since QE began – and the year-on-year data may look better as a result of a weak base effect and a one-off strong month in the data during the first quarter.

Meanwhile monetary growth has also softened over recent months on a sequential basis and therefore we can argue that more QE is already required.

Explanations

It’s hard to explain just why Euroland corporate bond issuance is so weak at present. In the US, corporate bond issuance has of course surged to what are probably uncomfortably high levels under the Fed’s QE regime, but this simply has not occurred in Europe.

This may be because companies are simply in a deleveraging mode, or it may be because the principal buyers of European corporate bonds have historically been the commercial banks who may now simply want to shrink their balance sheets for regulatory reasons.

Whatever the cause, it does seem beyond all reasonable doubt that QE has not led to stronger borrowing trends in Europe and particularly not within the corporate sector.

Another entirely plausible reason why the ECB might wish to expand QE might be to weaken the euro further. Mr. Draghi was at pains to point out that the fall in the oil and commodity prices had benefited Europe’s economy. But there needs to be a weaker euro to support traded goods producers. Much of Europe’s H1 2015 recovery can be traced back to the fact that the oil price fell by more than the Euro, thereby providing the domestic economy some insulation from the real income diminishing effects that normally accompany a devaluation. The region was able to enjoy the benefits of a weaker currency without suffering too many of the costs.

We can’t, of course be sure, however, that more QE will deliver a weaker euro given that at present, Europe’s running a current account surplus of some €300bn per annum and although this surplus has probably peaked, this does support the currency.

At the same time, Europe’s non-bank private sector is fairly consistently each year purchasing around €350bn of foreign bonds and around €50bn of foreign equities. A year or so ago, Europe’s banks were acquiring around €500bn of foreign credit exposure each year, but this has now started to reverse and may even have become a €100bn flow of repatriated funds.

These various ‘domestically orchestrated’ flows (i.e. the current account plus these various capital flows) were last year biased towards creating a weaker euro but the reversal in the direction of the banking system flows (i.e. “carry trade flows”) has created a situation in which the balance of domestic flows is roughly zero and therefore close to Euro ‘neutral’.

Future directions

Therefore, we can suggest that the future direction of the Euro will tend to be decided by the actions of foreign investors into Europe.

At present, foreign investors are relatively inactive in terms of their level of equity purchases, although they had previously been very active in the run up to QE.

Similarly, foreign investors were also very active as purchasers of European bonds in the run up to QE but since May they have become net sellers of bonds, presumably taking profits on their existing positions.

We must wonder, however, whether, with the ECB now promising more QE, lower yields and perhaps higher equity prices, foreign investors will once again begin acquiring Euroland assets.

If this occurs without a compensating further increase in the quantity of purchases of foreign bonds and equities by European real money investors, the result of the rumours of more QE will likely be a stronger rather than weaker EUR, at least for now.

Thus in 2014, the euro was in effect held down despite foreign investor inflows and the current account surplus by a combination of very large, but consistent, capital outflows by non-bank European investors and large outflows from European banks.

But with the latter now unlikely given  the regulatory environment, there may be insufficient outflows from Europe to offset the combined effects of the current account surplus and any renewed interest in Europe’s markets from abroad.

If the level of outflows from European investors does remain at the reasonably stable €400bn level seen for the last year or so, it’s likely that this will prove to be insufficient to offset the combined effects of any QE-related increase in foreign capital inflows, the ongoing current account surplus and the European banks’ repatriation of their foreign assets.

Under this scenario, the euro should tend, somewhat counter-intuitively, to appreciate, although in theory, the ECB could potentially undertake FX intervention to weaken the euro.

Stimuli

In practice, we can doubt that the ECB would or could enact such a provocative and overt competitive devaluation policy ahead of the US elections with no sign of ECB direct intervention in FX markets since the global financial crisis and changes in the level of the ECB’s holdings of FX reserves have resulted from the euro’s volatility.

Given the ongoing weak global economic environment, the question marks that remain over the future of Greece and the obvious lack of monetary traction that the ECB has so far achieved, it’s easy to see why Mr. Draghi has been obliged to talk up the prospects for further stimulus from the ECB. The euro does, after all, still face a simmering existential crisis.

However, if Mr. Draghi’s actions do result in a weaker euro, then he will be explicitly adding to global deflationary pressure, which may prove self-defeating for the ECB in the longer term.

But if the rumours of more QE lead to a counter- intuitive rise in the euro in the near term, then we may find that while Mr. Draghi inadvertently relieves some of the global deflationary pressures, this will come at the expense of Europe’s own traded goods producers.

On this form of cost-benefit-analysis it is difficult to see why more QE would be a good idea under either scenario.

What’s more, the ECB’s adoption of its existing QE has already caused an increase in the stresses within the TARGET2 system, while doing virtually nothing to improve underlying domestic monetary trends.

Consequently, we can argue that the case for more QE is far from proven, and actually very weak. But this’ll likely be ignored by markets for a while although over the longer term, the bottom line remains that the euro is a sub-optimal currency area that badly needs structural reform.

What it does not need is more ‘money printing’ that gives its political masters another excuse not to tackle the region’s fundamental problems.

Share

You may also like...

  • Economy: Inflation on the rise while the MPC sticks with ‘patient approach’ 28th Jul, 2021
  • Warrington’s credit rating downgraded by Moody’s 3rd May, 2022
  • Investors ‘potentially damaging housing business models’, MOTB attendees told 28th Mar, 2022
  • Cash flow forecasting key to treasurers 25th May, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’
    • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override
    • EAPF criticised for water company investments
    • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy
    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 days ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 4 days ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 5 days ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 6 days ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 6 days ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 1 week ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story DCLG preparing to scrap schedule 1 investment restrictions
  • Next story Chris Buss: ‘Broken faith’ and the HRA

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares