• Home
  • About
  • 151 IMPACT AWARDS
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

Impact Awards –>
  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

James Bevan: Pricing the risk of Brexit

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in James Bevan · Treasury
  • — 2 Mar, 2016
James Bevan

James Bevan

As we know, the long anticipated UK referendum on UK membership of the European Union will take place on 23rd June and we’ve long assumed that on balance, the most likely scenario is that Britain votes to stay in the EU.

But given there’s a risk that the vote is to leave, perhaps the critical question for us and our clients is whether ‘Brexit’ be bad for the assets held in the client portfolios and funds.

“Neverendum”

We need to begin by distinguishing between how markets will react to the risk of a Brexit, and to the actual reality of Brexit – if it happens.

Until 23rd June there will be considerable volatility, and, sterling, in particular, could suffer (it has already fallen by 5.5% vs the dollar and by 7% against the euro this year) as markets, preferring stability, wish the UK to stay in the EU.

The stock market effect has not yet been noticeable. The FTSE share index is overwhelmingly weighted towards multinationals with little reliance on the UK economy – and this will likely remain the case even in the event of a Brexit as the fortunes of companies like Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline, Diageo, HSBC and Royal Dutch Shell are unlikely to be affected much by UK membership of the EU.

It is the longer-term implications, however, that are far more complicated and difficult to predict. In particular, we cannot discount the risk of a ‘Neverendum’.

This latter sobriquet refers to the possibility of a Quebec-like situation resulting from a very close vote to stay.

Under such a scenario, politics become ugly as the ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ continue to skirmish and a further referendum gets called at a later date (as in Quebec). And, in the meantime, the country loses ground economically as investment is discouraged.

Interestingly, this has been the consequence of 2014’s referendum on Scottish independence. The Scots voted to stay in the UK by a margin of 10%, but the chief protagonists of departure from the Union, the Scottish Nationalist Party, have continued to campaign tirelessly for independence – despite describing the referendum as a ‘once in a generation’ vote beforehand.

Surplus services

The arguments presented by the ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ are well rehearsed.

  • The ‘outs’ argue that Britain would benefit from being free of some £10bn p.a. of EU dues; the myriad of social, employment and environmental regulations; the impact of open borders to EU migrants – not to mention the Common Agricultural Policy and the Common Fisheries Policy. In addition, Britain would be free to sign up to free trade deals with the US, China and others, whilst retaining fairly full access to the EU single market.
  • The ‘ins’ counter that the UK has benefited considerably from the single market. Tariffs have fallen and the EU now accounts for 45% of the UK’s exports of goods and services (whilst only 6.6% of the EU’s goods and services are exported to the UK). They argue that Britain is actually very lowly regulated according to the OECD, and the UK is by far the least regulated country in the EU. They also claim that Britain has actually benefited from migration with young skilled and semi-skilled migrants from Eastern Europe making the UK economy more dynamic and competitive.

Perhaps surprisingly, the UK is the largest exporter of services in the world after the US and – on a per capita basis – greatly outstrips the US.

According to John Kay, writing in the Financial Times, Britain has a trade surplus in almost every service except tourism.

In areas such as financial services, transport, communications, education, entertainment, publishing, information services, public relations, engineering consultancy, law and accountancy, Britain generates strong net service exports.

Indeed, these exceed Britain’s largest manufacturing exports (of cars and pharmaceuticals) by over 50% in each case.

The single market in such services is, for now, less developed than in manufactured goods but the UK has secured a commitment to open up the market in this area too in future. If it were to leave the EU, therefore, this potential long-term benefit to the UK services sector would be lost.

Institutional brake

The true economic effects of a Brexit are unlikely to be known for a number of years and are, in any case, hard to predict.

Some have tried – thus, for example, a highly regarded think tank, Open Europe, has modelled the impact on UK GDP in 2030,  assuming that if the vote is to leave, Brexit takes place on 1st January 2018.

Their best case scenario is a free trade deal with the EU, open borders to global trade and deregulation of the UK economy, and this adds 1.6% to GDP.

Their worst case scenario is failure to agree a trade deal with the EU and no free trade policy and has GDP falling by 2.2%. Open Europe’s central base case scenario is for a permanent effect on GDP in a modest range of +0.6% to -0.8% a year to 2030.

One of the big risk factors in a Brexit, which is rarely mentioned, is the higher degree of dependence  it  puts  on  the  British  electorate  to  make  the  right  choices  in general elections over the years ahead.

The current relatively business-friendly Conservative government will inevitably be replaced one day by a more left-wing government that is at least in relative terms, anti-business, anti-free market, high spending and interventionist, similar to what we had in the 1970s.

At that point, the stability and discipline provided by the EU membership would not be there. The value of this institutional brake was evident last year when a radical, socialist government in Greece was quickly made more moderate.

Another benefit of the EU over the last 25 years has been the stability provided by a common economic framework.

The competitive devaluations and higher spending of the 1980s – that led to high inflation – have been replaced by fairly co-ordinated economic policies.

Whilst monetary union has not been a success and the structural deficiencies are self-evident, we have not had a return to the more extreme policies pursued by various European governments in the 1970s and 1980s.

Equally, the benefits of the Thatcher period in the 1980s in the UK, that created the foundation for a more dynamic economy have become entrenched. Without the discipline and competitive pressure created by EU membership, these could, at some stage, be put at risk by an independently-minded government tempted to use devaluation and public spending to ‘rescue’ the UK from an economic downturn.

Impact

In terms of stock market impact, the performance of the share market in dollars since the referendum was called (in line with other European markets) suggests that large-cap UK equities are a natural hedge.

Mid-cap equities are more at risk, given that they are more exposed to the UK economy and have more limited or no foreign earnings.

So, the likes of retailers, housebuilders, leisure, property and certain financials, would suffer from a weaker economy and the impact of a weaker currency in the event of a Brexit, but such companies represent a small part of client portfolios relative to some peers.

The implication for European equities overall could be negative, not least because of the size of the UK market in the European index (30%), but also because of the disruptive effect on the European economy and the knock-on effect of Brexit on politics in other European countries where plebiscites may also be encouraged.

This could also increase the risk premium for European equities. Another risk factor for the UK is the high probability of another Scottish referendum in the event of a Brexit as the ruling Scottish Nationalists want to remain within the EU, a stance that opinion polls suggest a clear majority of Scots support.

In summary, our base case is that a Brexit will not occur, but a lot of the above risks are likely, at some stage, to be at least partially priced into currencies and markets over the coming months.

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

*CCLA is a supporter of Room151

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Europe in the words of Mr. Draghi… Europe in the words of Mr. Draghi… 9 Dec, 2011
  • Brexit effect: what does a vote to leave mean for finances? Brexit effect: what does a vote to leave mean for finances? 16 Jun, 2016
  • Warrington approves £80m housing association loan facilities Warrington approves £80m housing association loan facilities 11 Apr, 2019
  • Jackie Shute: A glance back in time through the CIPFA Treasury Management Risk Study Jackie Shute: A glance back in time through the CIPFA Treasury Management Risk Study 30 Nov, 2016

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    Impact Awards: Liverpool’s cafe culture and Warrington’s investment in homes: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards showcase  finance teams with a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight Liverpool City Council’s… dlvr.it/RxJsKb pic.twitter.com/dEYpaz6HP0

    Room151 1 day ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for housing or regeneration? Check out the 'Place Shaping' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @31tenConsulting in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !! pic.twitter.com/dU99vE6Wws

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for Adult Social Care & Health? Check out the ASC&H category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by Fundamentum Social Housing REIT in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for the environment? Check out the 'carbon management' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @ACSLLP in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 2 days ago

    So what are the seven categories for the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards? Here they are room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… #localgov #finance #outcomes

    Room151 2 days ago

    Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation?: The impact of the coronavirus pandemic, lockdown and wider economic uncertainty created  deflationary pressures which raise important considerations for the Local Government Pension Scheme writes… dlvr.it/RxF7Fs pic.twitter.com/JlcjROBIpz

    Room151 3 days ago

    JOB ALERT: LPFA Finance Director vacancy: London Pensions Fund Authority Finance Director and s151 Officer Competitive salary and benefits The largest Local Government Pension (LGPS) provider in London with around £6.5 billion of assets and 135[...] dlvr.it/RxBdJP

    Room151 3 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Further signs that local government finance is failing: The crisis in Liverpool and a fix for education budgets are further indication that local government finance is in need of a root and branch review. Even for those students[...] dlvr.it/Rx9PSV pic.twitter.com/sAanC2gEyu

    Room151 1 week ago

    Impact Awards: Finance helps launch school meals company and support business during lockdown: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards will showcase the way finance teams have a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight… dlvr.it/RwnlF4 pic.twitter.com/AJhne1MVG4

    Room151 1 week ago

    "This work has made a vital, practical contribution to ensuring people have been supported through the pandemic." #impact #151awards #covid #s151 room151.co.uk/treasury/impac… #impactcasestudies #councilfinancemakesadifference

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ #passiton #localgov #s151 #151awards pic.twitter.com/A0uO0dwBkM

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Financial pressures loom for 2023 and beyond: Kate Ogden writes the government has addressed most of the short-term Covid-19 financial pressures facing English councils, but problems loom in 2022-23 and the years following. As we enter the[...] dlvr.it/RwfDsz pic.twitter.com/hpv2R09w75

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Calling all #localgov finance officers and #s151s room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ It's the #151Awards Thanks to the @LGALocalism for helping us get the word out along with all the LA treasury societies. pic.twitter.com/Nkal9BrH1J

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Graham Liddell: Speeding up the internal audit countdown
  • Next story PWLB borrowing targeted for affordable homes

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK