• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

James Bevan: Pricing the risk of Brexit

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in James Bevan · Treasury
  • — 2 Mar, 2016
James Bevan

James Bevan

As we know, the long anticipated UK referendum on UK membership of the European Union will take place on 23rd June and we’ve long assumed that on balance, the most likely scenario is that Britain votes to stay in the EU.

But given there’s a risk that the vote is to leave, perhaps the critical question for us and our clients is whether ‘Brexit’ be bad for the assets held in the client portfolios and funds.

“Neverendum”

We need to begin by distinguishing between how markets will react to the risk of a Brexit, and to the actual reality of Brexit – if it happens.

Until 23rd June there will be considerable volatility, and, sterling, in particular, could suffer (it has already fallen by 5.5% vs the dollar and by 7% against the euro this year) as markets, preferring stability, wish the UK to stay in the EU.

The stock market effect has not yet been noticeable. The FTSE share index is overwhelmingly weighted towards multinationals with little reliance on the UK economy – and this will likely remain the case even in the event of a Brexit as the fortunes of companies like Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline, Diageo, HSBC and Royal Dutch Shell are unlikely to be affected much by UK membership of the EU.

It is the longer-term implications, however, that are far more complicated and difficult to predict. In particular, we cannot discount the risk of a ‘Neverendum’.

This latter sobriquet refers to the possibility of a Quebec-like situation resulting from a very close vote to stay.

Under such a scenario, politics become ugly as the ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ continue to skirmish and a further referendum gets called at a later date (as in Quebec). And, in the meantime, the country loses ground economically as investment is discouraged.

Interestingly, this has been the consequence of 2014’s referendum on Scottish independence. The Scots voted to stay in the UK by a margin of 10%, but the chief protagonists of departure from the Union, the Scottish Nationalist Party, have continued to campaign tirelessly for independence – despite describing the referendum as a ‘once in a generation’ vote beforehand.

Surplus services

The arguments presented by the ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ are well rehearsed.

  • The ‘outs’ argue that Britain would benefit from being free of some £10bn p.a. of EU dues; the myriad of social, employment and environmental regulations; the impact of open borders to EU migrants – not to mention the Common Agricultural Policy and the Common Fisheries Policy. In addition, Britain would be free to sign up to free trade deals with the US, China and others, whilst retaining fairly full access to the EU single market.
  • The ‘ins’ counter that the UK has benefited considerably from the single market. Tariffs have fallen and the EU now accounts for 45% of the UK’s exports of goods and services (whilst only 6.6% of the EU’s goods and services are exported to the UK). They argue that Britain is actually very lowly regulated according to the OECD, and the UK is by far the least regulated country in the EU. They also claim that Britain has actually benefited from migration with young skilled and semi-skilled migrants from Eastern Europe making the UK economy more dynamic and competitive.

Perhaps surprisingly, the UK is the largest exporter of services in the world after the US and – on a per capita basis – greatly outstrips the US.

According to John Kay, writing in the Financial Times, Britain has a trade surplus in almost every service except tourism.

In areas such as financial services, transport, communications, education, entertainment, publishing, information services, public relations, engineering consultancy, law and accountancy, Britain generates strong net service exports.

Indeed, these exceed Britain’s largest manufacturing exports (of cars and pharmaceuticals) by over 50% in each case.

The single market in such services is, for now, less developed than in manufactured goods but the UK has secured a commitment to open up the market in this area too in future. If it were to leave the EU, therefore, this potential long-term benefit to the UK services sector would be lost.

Institutional brake

The true economic effects of a Brexit are unlikely to be known for a number of years and are, in any case, hard to predict.

Some have tried – thus, for example, a highly regarded think tank, Open Europe, has modelled the impact on UK GDP in 2030,  assuming that if the vote is to leave, Brexit takes place on 1st January 2018.

Their best case scenario is a free trade deal with the EU, open borders to global trade and deregulation of the UK economy, and this adds 1.6% to GDP.

Their worst case scenario is failure to agree a trade deal with the EU and no free trade policy and has GDP falling by 2.2%. Open Europe’s central base case scenario is for a permanent effect on GDP in a modest range of +0.6% to -0.8% a year to 2030.

One of the big risk factors in a Brexit, which is rarely mentioned, is the higher degree of dependence  it  puts  on  the  British  electorate  to  make  the  right  choices  in general elections over the years ahead.

The current relatively business-friendly Conservative government will inevitably be replaced one day by a more left-wing government that is at least in relative terms, anti-business, anti-free market, high spending and interventionist, similar to what we had in the 1970s.

At that point, the stability and discipline provided by the EU membership would not be there. The value of this institutional brake was evident last year when a radical, socialist government in Greece was quickly made more moderate.

Another benefit of the EU over the last 25 years has been the stability provided by a common economic framework.

The competitive devaluations and higher spending of the 1980s – that led to high inflation – have been replaced by fairly co-ordinated economic policies.

Whilst monetary union has not been a success and the structural deficiencies are self-evident, we have not had a return to the more extreme policies pursued by various European governments in the 1970s and 1980s.

Equally, the benefits of the Thatcher period in the 1980s in the UK, that created the foundation for a more dynamic economy have become entrenched. Without the discipline and competitive pressure created by EU membership, these could, at some stage, be put at risk by an independently-minded government tempted to use devaluation and public spending to ‘rescue’ the UK from an economic downturn.

Impact

In terms of stock market impact, the performance of the share market in dollars since the referendum was called (in line with other European markets) suggests that large-cap UK equities are a natural hedge.

Mid-cap equities are more at risk, given that they are more exposed to the UK economy and have more limited or no foreign earnings.

So, the likes of retailers, housebuilders, leisure, property and certain financials, would suffer from a weaker economy and the impact of a weaker currency in the event of a Brexit, but such companies represent a small part of client portfolios relative to some peers.

The implication for European equities overall could be negative, not least because of the size of the UK market in the European index (30%), but also because of the disruptive effect on the European economy and the knock-on effect of Brexit on politics in other European countries where plebiscites may also be encouraged.

This could also increase the risk premium for European equities. Another risk factor for the UK is the high probability of another Scottish referendum in the event of a Brexit as the ruling Scottish Nationalists want to remain within the EU, a stance that opinion polls suggest a clear majority of Scots support.

In summary, our base case is that a Brexit will not occur, but a lot of the above risks are likely, at some stage, to be at least partially priced into currencies and markets over the coming months.

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

*CCLA is a supporter of Room151

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • To boldly go… To boldly go… 1 Jul, 2013
  • Local authority debt strategy and diversification in a new era 22 Oct, 2020
  • James Bevan: Global capital flows James Bevan: Global capital flows 23 Sep, 2015
  • Amundi Q&A: “Active and flexible” investment produces better returns Amundi Q&A: “Active and flexible” investment produces better returns 9 Apr, 2015

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    FDs’ Summit experts defend councils as MPs label property investment ‘risky’: As Room151’s FDs’ Summit conference explores local government’s investment in commercial property MPs once again lable it a “significant risk to government”. Once again MPs… dlvr.it/Rr7lZx pic.twitter.com/jPvcZjDAS4

    Room151 2 days ago

    Global macro outlook: Virus versus vaccine: Sponsored article: Salman Ahmed argues monetary policy, a global vaccine rollout and fiscal stimulus are likely to put “upward pressure” on bond yields. Much like the latter half of 2020,[...] dlvr.it/Rr60nt pic.twitter.com/qsymBWmKmV

    Room151 3 days ago

    ‘Chasing yield’ not the best strategy as negative rates loom: Recent speculation that the UK may be heading toward negative interest rates prompts questions for treasury officers managing local authority funds at LATIF. Speculation is rife that the UK… dlvr.it/Rr3Mrj pic.twitter.com/wtxYAB20PO

    Room151 5 days ago

    Will new public procurement rules offer the best commercial results?: The government has issued a green paper on reforming procurement rules. Helen Randall and Rebecca Rees examine the proposals and argue they may not go far enough. The Cabinet… dlvr.it/Rqtw6T pic.twitter.com/9GiVTkL08U

    Room151 1 week ago

    The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk: Sponsored article: Lauren Sewell examines the prospects for long-term borrowing as Brexit settles and vaccines are deployed against Covid-19. On the 9th October 2019 Whitehall sent… dlvr.it/RqZXCr pic.twitter.com/PzgOZOGQ0k

    Room151 1 week ago

    ESG in liquidity: Sponsored article: Gavin Haywood looks at the integration of ESG in Federated Hermes’ money market funds. Federated Hermes has over 300 public sector clients invested in our AAA rated money[...] dlvr.it/RqZX5f pic.twitter.com/E87sBXsay8

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

    Room151 1 month ago

    Room151’s top stories from a momentous year: 2020 was the year in which local government grappled with Covid-19, funding strains, controversy over borrowing rules and the threat of financial collapse. It has been an exhausting and historic[...] dlvr.it/RnlpZg pic.twitter.com/g3myNyox6J

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Graham Liddell: Speeding up the internal audit countdown
  • Next story PWLB borrowing targeted for affordable homes

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK