• Home
  • About
  • 151 IMPACT AWARDS
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

Impact Awards –>
  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

James Bevan: Why not just cancel sovereign debt?

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in Blogs · James Bevan · Treasury
  • — 12 Mar, 2015

At a recent get-together with trustees in Bristol, we discussed Quantitative Easing (QE) and one trustee asked why central banks cannot simply cancel the government debt that they own as a result of QE, and in so doing reduce government debt burdens, thereby paving the way for lower taxes and hopefully a boost to the economy.

At first sight, the policy would seem to offer something for nothing, but a central bank’s holdings of government bonds were purchased so that the central bank could give ‘deposits’ to the private sector. Or in the cases in which the central bank purchased the bonds in the primary markets, they were bought so that the government agencies could spend money in the real economies. This amounts to the same thing in a monetary sense and also from a monetary perspective. When the central bank acquired fixed income assets so that the private sector could acquire deposit assets, the two sides of the equation cannot be separated.

A fat slab of the funds received by the private sector will be saved (ultimately) in the form of deposits, or used to repay existing debts. Indeed, much of the increase in public sector indebtedness in Japan and elsewhere that the banking system took on during the QE phases can in fact be regarded as having ‘replaced’ private sector debt on the banking systems’ balance sheets.

However, this now retired private sector debt (which was an asset of the banks) had been matched either by domestic deposits or by banks’ offshore funding (i.e. their external liabilities) and when public sector debt was used to replace private sector debt, it will have left the liabilities side of the balance sheet ‘unchanged’. In consequence, the public debt that is now owned by the banking system is ultimately matched either by a customer deposit or an external liability.

At this point in may be helpful to think of the economy as a series of ‘T accounts’.

  • The central bank holds as an asset the government bonds but the matching liability is the cash in circulation and the reserve deposits of the commercial banking system.
  • The reserve deposits of the banking system are then an asset of the commercial banks and their matching liabilities are either customer deposits or their offshore borrowings.
  • If we ‘miss out’ the middle part of this equation – i.e. consolidate the data – we again find that the banking system’s holdings of bonds are the matching assets to the banks deposit and external liabilities.  As a consequence of this logic, we can summarise the situation to say that the government bonds that the central banks now own are in effect “the assets” that correspond to the banking systems’ liabilities which are either in the form of liabilities to non-residents or deposit-type instruments owned by their own private sectors.

In the case of the former, it is quite possible and indeed feasible that the central bank could cancel its bond holdings, and at the same time reduce its own liabilities to the commercial banks (i.e. their reserves). The banking system could then simply default on its external liabilities but the ramifications of such a move might be “interesting”.  Countries such as Turkey, in which the banking system both owns a lot of bonds and owes a lot of foreign liabilities, could potentially adopt this route but we might reasonably expect some form of retaliation at that point.

More likely, and we’ve seen this before, the central bank could cancel its bond holdings, mark down the commercial banking system’s reserves proportionately, and thereby inflict heavy losses on commercial banks.  At that point, the banks could either write down the value of some of their customers’ deposits (likely causing chaos in the real economy) or the government would have to underwrite the deposits – but this would require the government to issue debt to fund this, taking the public sector debt ratio back up.

A final option might be for the central bank to write off its bond holdings but not to write down the value of the banking system’s reserve deposits. At this point, the central bank would of course take a hit to its capital structure, requiring re-finance via capital from the finance ministry, itself needing the issue of more government bonds.

So the plan could succeed if the banking system defaulted on its foreign debts with all the risks of retaliation, but a better plan for the central banks could be to consolidate their exiting bond holdings into a single zero interest ‘consol’ and leave them to fester quietly on the balance sheet for fifty years. Indeed, central banks probably should do this but only in exchange for reforms and real economic deregulation from governments to raise economies’ sustainable rates of productivity and real growth.  Such a genuine approach to economic recovery, rather than an accounting sleight-of-hand would have real merit.

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

  • David Green: Finding a ‘lifeline’ for problematic LOBOs David Green: Finding a ‘lifeline’ for problematic LOBOs 2 Jul, 2018
  • Greece risks default but that doesn’t necessarily mean Grexit Greece risks default but that doesn’t necessarily mean Grexit 30 Apr, 2015
  • Will the bankers’ bonus clawback work? Will the bankers’ bonus clawback work? 5 Aug, 2014
  • Terry Crossley: Is LGPS pooling sustainable? Terry Crossley: Is LGPS pooling sustainable? 28 Oct, 2018

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    Impact Awards: Cheltenham’s tech hub and Hackney’s recovery from cyber attack: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards spotlight  finance teams with a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we explore Cheltenham Borough Council’s… dlvr.it/Rxg53h pic.twitter.com/iH8oGKOfSs

    Room151 2 days ago

    Collaboration the key to district recovery post-pandemic: Regeneration and economic growth will depend on districts’ ability to secure funding and work with public and private partners, argues Sanjiv Kohli. Covid hit us in March 2020 and immediately[...] dlvr.it/Rxb4VK pic.twitter.com/FiMynEQVPU

    Room151 7 days ago

    Impact Awards: Liverpool’s cafe culture and Warrington’s investment in homes: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards showcase  finance teams with a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight Liverpool City Council’s… dlvr.it/RxJsKb pic.twitter.com/dEYpaz6HP0

    Room151 7 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for housing or regeneration? Check out the 'Place Shaping' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @31tenConsulting in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !! pic.twitter.com/dU99vE6Wws

    Room151 1 week ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for Adult Social Care & Health? Check out the ASC&H category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by Fundamentum Social Housing REIT in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 1 week ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for the environment? Check out the 'carbon management' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @ACSLLP in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 1 week ago

    So what are the seven categories for the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards? Here they are room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… #localgov #finance #outcomes

    Room151 1 week ago

    Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation?: The impact of the coronavirus pandemic, lockdown and wider economic uncertainty created  deflationary pressures which raise important considerations for the Local Government Pension Scheme writes… dlvr.it/RxF7Fs pic.twitter.com/JlcjROBIpz

    Room151 1 week ago

    JOB ALERT: LPFA Finance Director vacancy: London Pensions Fund Authority Finance Director and s151 Officer Competitive salary and benefits The largest Local Government Pension (LGPS) provider in London with around £6.5 billion of assets and 135[...] dlvr.it/RxBdJP

    Room151 1 week ago

    Richard Harbord: Further signs that local government finance is failing: The crisis in Liverpool and a fix for education budgets are further indication that local government finance is in need of a root and branch review. Even for those students[...] dlvr.it/Rx9PSV pic.twitter.com/sAanC2gEyu

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Impact Awards: Finance helps launch school meals company and support business during lockdown: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards will showcase the way finance teams have a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight… dlvr.it/RwnlF4 pic.twitter.com/AJhne1MVG4

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    "This work has made a vital, practical contribution to ensuring people have been supported through the pandemic." #impact #151awards #covid #s151 room151.co.uk/treasury/impac… #impactcasestudies #councilfinancemakesadifference

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Richard Harbord: The budget pressure in on 151 officers
  • Next story Metro bank makes headway winning council business

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.