• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

LOBOs and the confessions of an ex-auditor

0
  • by Stephen Sheen
  • in Stephen Sheen · Treasury
  • — 20 Jul, 2015

sheen-520A probe into the use of LOBO loans will today get under way by the communities and local government select committee of the House of Commons. The hearing follows the broadcast of a documentary by the Dispatches programme on Channel 4. Here former auditor Stephen Sheen offers his insight on LOBOs and the responsibilities of local authority finance chiefs.


By Stephen Sheen
There must be some small discomfort in the minds of directors of finance as they duck the LOBO beamers flung enthusiastically in their direction by Channel 4 rather than hooking them over the ropes for six.

The arguments that authorities that took out lender option borrower options (LOBO) loans are better off than if they had borrowed from the PWLB are somewhat disingenuous.  The big numbers being thrown around by the critics do have relevance, but not necessarily to illuminate the evils inherent in LOBOs.  Instead, the billions of pounds count the cost of committing to fixed interest rate borrowing generally.

As authorities are required to disclose the fair value of their loan portfolios in the annual statement of accounts, figures are readily available for the additional interest burdens that authorities will have as a result of fixing interest rates.  The estimates are imperfect, in that they presume that currently available interest rates will persist over the remaining term of the loans.  But the figures that result can be so substantial that the message prevails over the crudity.

It is not uncommon for a fair valuation to add 20% or more to the principal amount of a loan portfolio.  Many authorities are currently laying out millions more on interest payments than they might if they had borrowed at variable rates.

Whether there is any scandal in this depends on whether you consider that authorities gambled unreasonably that interest rates would not fall in protecting themselves against the possibility that they would rise.  You would probably also have to be able to say, “I told you so” rather than rely on the benefits of hindsight.  It was likely the case that with interest rates on the decline, minds were more on the prospect of them bottoming out rather than proceeding downwards to historically low levels.

As an auditor at the time, I recall that the questions being asked were also not focused on whether LOBOs had unlawfully sneaked Bermudan swaptions into the panoply of local authority treasury instruments.  The more basic issue was whether directors of finance understood fully at the time what they were getting into.

The immediate feature of most LOBOs was their unprecedentedly long term, leading to suspicions that they were intended as Dispatches: How Councils Blow Your Millionsvehicles to spread the premiums that would be payable on redemption of existing loans over as long a period as possible.  PWLB loans would be repaid at a premium, and the charge spread over the term of the replacement loans.  This was at best a questionably unreasonable application of the accounting opportunity to spread premiums over future periods (where the remaining term of the replaced loans was the more obvious reference point).

For some LOBOs, the initial teaser rate (sometimes 0%) also provided the tempting prospect of revenue relief for the initial years of the loan.   Again, proper accounting practices should probably have nullified the effect by calculating an equalised rate for the loan.

In my view, LOBOs didn’t then deliver what was being hoped for.

So, two alternative views.  One promising short-term revenue relief and leaving the authority only marginally more exposed to the risk of rising interest rates than an alternative PWLB fixed rate loan.  The other relying on appeals to concepts of “substance over form” and the reasonable application of powers to reveal the cloth from which the new LOBO clothes were actually cut.

Unsurprisingly the debate at the time was not a long one.

So, why worry about it in 2015?  Because it is still the episode from my twenty-year audit career that I remember with most concern about the enduring question of the acceptance of advice without due critical reflection.  No matter how good advice might be, the person taking it on behalf of their organisation has a duty to be appropriately sceptical about its reliability.  My experience was that, for the substantial amounts involved in switching PWLB loans for LOBOs, authorities might have been too ready to accept guidance about what they could do as an instruction about what they should do.  Did officers engage sufficiently with the advice that they were able to conclude reasonably that this is what the authority ought to do?

Sometimes things are too good to be true.  But although this will not be so for the majority of cases, with such large sums potentially at stake, the onus on the director of finance is to have no reason to doubt that goodness.  Be respectful, be trusting, but never stop being sceptical.

Stephen Sheen is the managing director Ichabod’s Industries, a consultancy providing technical accounting support to local government.

Share

You may also like...

  • Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers 12th Jan, 2021
  • Loans: The legal checklist for supporting enterprise 24th Sep, 2021
  • Course aims to aid move from private sector to council accounting 29th Sep, 2021
  • Finance chiefs may have to ’embrace the uncertainty’ in financial planning 11th Jun, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 2 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Council income, devolution complications, Manchester advice contract, joint services for London councils
  • Next story Agent151: Right to buy – ‘the emperor has no clothes’

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares