• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Newham’s property for pensions plan delayed

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in LGPS · Treasury
  • — 20 Aug, 2015

A council’s plan to transfer property into a special purpose company to reduce the revenue impact of its pension fund liabilities has been delayed after councillors demanded to examine the proposals.

In July, London Borough of Newham’s cabinet agreed to release up to £500,000 to create the vehicle which would harness the council’s property portfolio to create an income stream for its pension fund.

The plan would be the first of its kind in the local authority sector, but the authority’s overview and scrutiny committee has now decided to take a closer look at the proposals.

Three councillors last week wrote to the committee requesting the call-in, saying: “We believe that this is the wrong sequencing for this decision because the proposal has not been consulted upon and agreed beforehand with the Newham Council investment and accounts committee.

“As members of this committee we are concerned that this proposal may not be in the best interests of the council nor the staff pension fund and we might waste this £500,000 if the committee decide that this proposal is not appropriate.”

They said that the proposal has “significant risks attached to it which we feel merit proper scrutiny”.

The July report which was approved by the council’s cabinet said that implementing the plan would reduce initial pension contributions, generating revenue savings over the next three years.

In the fourth year, the council would test whether the fund was better or worse off than assumed.

But the report warned: “If the position is worse than assumed then this would result in the council making rental payments over the long term for the property assets covered by this arrangement.”

An initial feasibility and cost benefit study of the proposal was completed by consultant KPMG in May, and it had been hoped to introduce the scheme for the start of the 2016/17 financial year.

The SPV model has been used widely by private sector pension funds to offset liabilities. However, Newham’s proposal, if approved, would be the first time that it has been used by a council pension fund.

Details on Newham’s proposals are sparse, but generally the model involves a sponsoring employer transferring assets into an SPV which uses them to generate an income stream for its pension fund.

The Pensions Regulator warned in 2013 that the use of such complex structures “can lead to increases in risk where advisers to schemes have not anticipated all the implications of using this structure”.

It added: “It is vital that trustees understand the risks they are taking and consider carefully whether a more complex approach to supporting the scheme, which may involve additional risk taking by the scheme, is preferable to a straightforward one.”

The cabinet report said that advice from external advisers said that the council possesses the legal powers to set up the arrangements but recommended further exploration of legal and financial implications.

Keith Webster, pensions partner at law firm CMS Cameron McKenna, said: “Such schemes usually involve granting security over the assets transferred and there may be concerns about how appropriate it is for this to happen in some cases.”

He said that straightforward SPV models could cost as little as £250,000 to put in place but Newham was likely to incur extra costs due to the fact that it has not been undertaken by a local authority before.

A spokeswoman for Newham said that the council was “not in a position to talk about” how the scheme would work, nor the scale of potential risk involved in the scheme.

The overview and scrutiny committee will take place on Monday evening and consider whether to make a recommendation to the council’s executive that no further money should be spent on the project until it has been considered by the investment and accounts committee.

Photo (cropped): Plane Stupid, Flickr,

Share

You may also like...

  • ESG is an ‘essential’ consideration for money market instruments 23rd Nov, 2021
  • A year in the life of an s151: ‘We delivered unbelievable things’ 16th Dec, 2021
  • The net-zero challenge for LGPS funds 7th Apr, 2022
  • GameStop: A lesson for LGPS in the risks of short selling 8th Feb, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 23 hours ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 6 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 6 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 7 days ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 1 week ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 1 week ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story James Bevan: Global growth in focus
  • Next story News Roundup: Manchester dividend, Boris’ new pension adviser, shared services flop, Barnsley’s eBay sale

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares