• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

OFT examines Arlingclose/Sterling merger

0
  • by Jo Tura
  • in Treasury
  • — 28 Nov, 2012

Arlingclose’s acquisition of Sterling is being examined by the Office of Fair Trade.

The acquisition was announced last month and the OFT is now inviting comments on whether the deal has resulted in the creation of a relevant merger situation under the merger provisions of the Enterprise Act 2002 and may result in a substantial lessening of competition in the market.

Elliot Ball, spokesman for the OFT, said that as the merger has already been completed it may be that the companies concerned notified the Office as there is a voluntary regime for notification.

The OFT will look at whether the merged entity will have over 25% of market share. The other criteria for investigating a merger situation is combined turnover of over £70m, which is not the case with the merged Arlingclose/ Sterling.

The OFT has four courses of action available to it. One is finding turnover or market share too small and finding the merger does not qualify. Second is finding that the merger qualifies but clearing it. “It could be that we look at it and find that while it fits the criteria it does not raise any red flags and can be cleared without modifications,” explained Ball.

The two other options would be asking the merged entity to divest certain operations to avoid an anti-competitive market share, or referring the transaction to the Competition Commission. “There they would conduct an in-depth analysis over five weeks to look at the merger and potentially block it,” said Ball.

Sector’s merger with Butlers was referred to the Competition Commission last March. At the time several local authorities submitted comments, with only one or two concerned about lack of competition. A similar attitude exists now with regard to Arlingclose’s merger.

“What matters is whether you are confident with the quality of service that you are getting, so the number of players in the market isn’t as important as whether they are providing what you need,” Cambridge County Council’s head of accounting services Julia Minns told Room 151 this week.

At Ashford Borough Council deputy 151 officer Ben Lockwood agreed: “I’m not sure that having a wide market choice is the be all and end all when it comes to advisers, if the main players in the market are offering good advice and good service then that is enough.”

Minns also pointed out that more players in a market would not necessarily lead to better service. “In fact you might get a better concentration of expertise in the two organisations supporting the same user base,” she said.

A local authority treasurer who did not wish to be named thinks that the number of players in the market slimming down was inevitable. “Current market conditions combined with a reduction in other income streams meant that the business model of some advisers just wasn’t sustainable,” he explained.

“The advisory fees on their own are actually quite low if you look at what you are getting for them. At one stage we looked at getting the credit ratings direct from the agencies and that was going to cost a lot more than taking the treasury advisory service which gives you the credit rating anyway.” It would be preferable, however, to have more than two consultancies to chose from, added the treasurer.

Arlingclose was unable to comment on this article due to the ongoing nature of the OFT’s investigation.

Share

You may also like...

  • MBA develops ESG bond framework 28th Jan, 2021
  • Treasury year in review: inflation, regulation, borrowing and investment ups and downs 9th Dec, 2021
  • How much MRP is enough? 2nd Mar, 2022
  • What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds? 24th Feb, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 12 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 12 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Prisk supports Hertfordshire LAMS launch
  • Next story Positive thinking on Euroland

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares