• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Q&A: The Local Authorities’ Property Fund

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in Interviews · Treasury
  • — 5 Nov, 2015

Michael Quicke, chief executive of CCLA, explains the development of the Local Authorities’ Property Fund which reached £500m in October this year.

Q: How quickly has the fund reached £500m?

If we go back four years, the fund was pretty stable at under £100m and wasn’t really rising. The increase has really happened over the past couple of years.

Q: What do you think has driven the rapid increase in the fund’s size?

It relates to a whole series of things. After years of very low interest rates, as a recent Room151 survey identified, councils are keen to diversify their investments, partly because they feel less secure with traditional counterparties and partly because they felt they were historically under – diversified.

Property is a well understood asset with high and predictable income. A small investment in property can make a big difference to the overall yield on their funds.

The LAPF has a strong governance regime, a good performance track record, and some accounting advantages compared with other investments.

The Local Authorities (Capital Finance and Accounting) (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2010 exempts an investment in the LAPF investments from being capital expenditure. This means that they can benefit from the LAPF’s income without having to reflect capital value changes until the investment is sold.

Q: How many councils are now invested in the LAPF?

There are 125 investors using the fund – investments ranging from £25,000 to £30m. There are 12 county councils, five London borough councils, 24 borough councils, eight City councils, and 22 district councils, 32 town councils, and 22 other local authority investors. Everybody gets the same return, with a single class of share. It has proved attractive across the board because all councils have the same proportionate pressure on their resources.

Q: How does the governance of the fund work?

The governance of the LAPF is controlled by the local authority sector. The trustee – the Local Authorities Mutual Investment Trust (LAMIT) – is also a shareholder in CCLA and appoints a non- executive director to our Board.

Every quarter we make presentations to the LAMIT council, and they hold us to account in our management of the fund.

They bring their knowledge of the needs and concerns of local authorities which helps us in the way that we manage the fund.

Some fund managers have not covered themselves in glory in the way they have managed investments for clients. Being owned by our investors means that this is hard coded into the way that CCLA operates.

Q: You mentioned the performance of the fund – what are the figures on that?

The most up to date figures we have are for the 12 months to the end of September. We compare the performance of the fund against the IPD Other Balanced Property Fund Index. During the most recent period the LAPF produced a return – covering income and capital – of 15.2%, compared to an index average of 14.8%. If we look at the past three years, there was a compound return of 13.2% compared to 11.8% for the index.

Q: How is the property portfolio of the fund made up?

The fund holds over 40 properties spread geographically and over different sectors. The largest sector by capital value is offices, which make up 45.1%, followed by offices in the South East but outside London make up 21.3%. In third place, industrials outside the South East of England, which make up 18%.

We restrict the maximum size of any property to 10% of the total fund value, and are asset-driven looking for really good properties that we can work in the future. We are looking to actively manage the fund holdings to enhance returns.

Q: What is the state of the property market at the moment and are there any clouds on the horizon which could affect the fund?

To start with, property is a long-term investment where the principle component of return is the rental income. The value of property, particularly outside of London, is still below the peak of 2007, despite recent improvements. Recently, we have seen capital values enhanced by reductions in yield, but as the economy improves, rent increases are likely to take over as the main driver of returns.

Q: What about the risk arising from properties becoming vacant?

That goes to the nature of the properties we acquire. We are keen to buy good, well positioned properties and consider that more important than the length of the lease.

If you buy a property in a bad location with a long term tenant, if they go bust then you have an empty property that is difficult to fill. Buying good, well positioned properties with relatively short leases means that we can get them cheaply and don’t have to wait as long to enhance the value.

A testimony to the quality of the assets held is that the void rate is 3.1%, compared with one of over 10% for the sector as a whole.

Q: Is there a limit to how big the fund can get?

There is a limit but we are a long way from that. We are not a large property fund. LAPF has gone from being a small property fund to a medium sized property fund. The major constraint will be whether we can continue to find attractive properties to buy that will deliver the returns investors require. On this, it’s important to remember that as the fund grows so the range of opportunities grows too in that larger properties become potential investments.

Photo (cropped): Oatsy40, Flickr.

CCLA is a supporter of Room151.co.uk.

Share

You may also like...

  • Exploring the hydrogen spectrum: The future’s white 27th Sep, 2021
  • Global macro outlook: Virus versus vaccine 22nd Jan, 2021
  • A year in the life of an s151: ‘We delivered unbelievable things’ 16th Dec, 2021
  • Room151’s 10th Anniversary: A treasury decade that saw borrowing double and investments transformed 25th Nov, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 2 days ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 3 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 1 week ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story James Bevan: The US and where we’re heading
  • Next story News Roundup: Self-assessed business rates, Clwyd’s hedge fund mandate, LGPS accusations, planning fee losses,

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares