• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Richard Harbord: Post election council tax – revaluation and referendums

0
  • by Editor
  • in Resources · Treasury
  • — 19 May, 2015

One of the more interesting questions of “what happens now”, concerns the future of council tax.

Central government is being urged by the Local Government Association and others to allow authorities the ability to set their own levels of tax without central control. This is, of course, how it was under General Rates where large percentage increases were not unusual. The expectation then was that accountability would sort out, and control, the levels as the ratepayers would pass judgement at the ballot box. It was also interesting that some high-increase authorities were voted back in with the suspicion that the residents were actually willing to pay more for better services.

At the Local Government Conference last year Eric Pickles told delegates how he had been disappointed at the lack of council tax referenda. Referendums, he said, were the correct and democratic way of deciding council tax increases and it had been his expectation that authorities would use them to gain the views of residents on priorities and important services.

I have to say, I always took the view that it was a singular waste of time and money running a referendum to ask residents if they would like to pay more tax. However, as I never put it to the test I have to accept that the secretary of state may have had a point.

But the first ever council tax referendum has just been held in Bedfordshire. At first sight it would seem to agree entirely with Pickles’ point. The referendum was for the police and crime commissioner and the deal was a 15.8% increase in precept for 100 additional police constables. There was a very good turnout for the referendum of around 65% and the result was approximately 70% of votes against the increase.

This could be the start of a more general attempt to seek higher tax increases to fund particular services as more savings are made over the next two years.

Some uncharitable people would say that this rather limits the decision making of elected councillors. That is to say residents have elected people to take these sort of decisions for them without asking for specific guidance on individual policy issues.

There are also greater matters of principle around the future of council tax. Mansion tax has gone but it is time that the system was brought up to date . It is difficult to explain to people that the banding is based on values 25 years ago. It somewhat discredits the tax because people find it difficult to understand. The system needs to have a revaluation. It practice no tax should be brought in without legislation stating the dates for future revaluations and government should be encouraged to stick with them regardless.

There also needs to be an extension of bands. Although mansion tax was not well thought out the basic principle of higher value houses paying higher tax is a sound one.  I know that I have bored people endlessly with the example of the locality where I live in which  several houses sold in excess of £20m pay only one band higher than I do in my modest dwelling. This cannot be right.

I was amused to learn that in New Zealand the domestic property tax on revaluation receives around 60% of appeals. The significant thing is that most of these appeals are to raise values as this is seen as being very important to the residents.

The system here needs a thorough overhaul and updating and with additional bands may well produce more income to finance local services. Wales did have a revaluation but the political risks are perceived to be high and therefore the only time to do it is at the beginning of a five year parliament.

Share

You may also like...

  • Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government 24th Jun, 2022
  • On the hunt in high yield 24th May, 2021
  • David Green: CIPFA ‘softens edges’ of the new Prudential Code 16th Jul, 2021
  • MOTB speakers and attendees call for permanent IFRS 9 override 27th May, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 1 day ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 3 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 1 week ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story News Roundup: Devolution for Queen’s Speech, shared service savings, CEO for London CIV, Swansea’s commercial approach
  • Next story John Kelly: ‘New mood of optimism for property’

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares