• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • London CIV appoints Dean Bowden as CEO

    August 18, 2022

  • Coventry secures over £115m of funding to decarbonise transport system

    August 18, 2022

  • Bexley Pension Fund appoints responsible investment consultant

    August 17, 2022

  • Leeds’ £120m levelling up bids offers ‘transformational change’

    August 16, 2022

  • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’

    August 15, 2022

  • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override

    August 12, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Treasury adviser questions rivals over LOBOs

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in Treasury
  • — 15 Oct, 2015

A leading local authority treasury adviser has questioned why rivals were paid by brokers to arrange Lender Option Borrower Option (LOBO) loans.

In a written submission to the House of Commons communities and local government select committee, which is investigating LOBOs, Arlingclose said that there were potential conflicts of interest in the payments.

In July, an oral evidence session of the committee heard concerns about payments received by treasury advisers when their local authority clients agreed to take out loans through broking companies with which they had a relationship.

In its submission, Arlingclose said: “Since, it is claimed, that the role of the adviser was to provide merely comparative information together with economic forecasts from a number of unspecified economists in return for a consultative fee, we wonder what service the adviser was providing to the local authority in return for the commissions paid to it by money brokers.

“It doesn’t appear to have been to rebalance the information asymmetry in favour of their clients.”

It said that commissions paid by money brokers were often well in excess of the consultative fee paid by the local authority as an annual retainer. Typically, the standard level a council paid for brokerage on a LOBO loan was £24,000 for a £10m loan, it said.

Arlingclose continued: “There is clearly a potential conflict of interest in the roles of advisers receiving commissions derived from borrowing or investing transactions of their clients.

“Whilst, it is stated that commissions derived from LOBOs between advisers and money brokers no longer takes place it is perhaps not down to chance that there is a high correlation between the money broker facilitating the LOBO and the adviser providing comparative information to the local authority ultimately borrowing it.”

Arlingclose also described as “disappointing” the attitude of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which has said that it has no powers covering the selling of LOBO loans.

“It appears that local authorities are excluded from much of the regulatory protections that the FCA provide because of its view that the significant levels of  local authority borrowing that include inherently risky instruments are undertaken entirely in an unregulated space where no one appears accountable for anything,” it said.

The treasury adviser also cast doubt on the strong defence of LOBOs launched by a number of local authorities which borrowed using the mechanism.

It said that “in some instances these claims potentially demonstrate that the risks associated with LOBOs are still not fully appreciated”.

In its own written evidence to the communities committee made in September, Capita Asset Services insisted it has never hidden payments from money brokers arranging LOBOs.

The submission said: “Sector Treasury Services Limited was part of the Capita group of companies during the period in question (Sector was rebranded as Capita Treasury solutions in 2013).

“We can confirm that we do not currently receive any commission or other payment from Tullett Prebon or any other money broker operating in the LOBO market. Where we have received payments from money brokers in the past, these arrangements were disclosed to local authorities under our standard terms of business at the relevant times.”

Capita adds: “We are aware that a number of local authorities have gone on record recently to explain their use of LOBO products, in particular detailing the economic climate that was prevalent during the timeframe in question.

“Sector’s role in this context would have been to provide comparative information on the options available to the local authorities together with economic forecasts from a number of economists.

“The options presented would have related to the categories or types of funding which the local authority could consider, together with examples of loans available.

“For example, information would have been provided by Sector on the rates offered by the PWLB, plus indicative rates of other long-term loans, as well as the loss of income rate should cash be used.

“Sector would have received a consultative fee for these services but would not have executed or acted as an intermediary for any resulting council transactions.”

Capita also sought to explain its relationship with Butlers, a treasury advisor acquired by Sector. It told the committee: “You have asked specifically about the role of Butlers regarding LOBO Loans. We see from the transcript that the Committee’s focus is on the period prior to 2011.

“We should make it clear that Sector only acquired Butlers in October 2010 and from this date Butlers ceased to exist as a separate business. Up to this date, Butlers was owned by ICAP. As such, we are unable to comment on Butlers’specific role in these loans as we had no affiliation with them at the time.”

A separate submission to the committee from Cornwall Council, which was criticised in the Channel 4 Dispatches programme which led to the committee investigation, said evidence heard in the oral hearing had been “one-sided”.

It called for the committee to take evidence from other witnesses “that will give a more balanced approach”.

 

Share

You may also like...

  • Impact Awards: Shortlist revealed 2nd Jun, 2021
  • Impact Awards: Liverpool’s cafe culture and Warrington’s investment in homes 9th Apr, 2021
  • FDs’ Summit experts defend councils as MPs label property investment ‘risky’ 22nd Jan, 2021
  • Inflation spike creates watching brief for treasury officers 24th Jun, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • London CIV appoints Dean Bowden as CEO
    • Coventry secures over £115m of funding to decarbonise transport system
    • Bexley Pension Fund appoints responsible investment consultant
    • Leeds’ £120m levelling up bids offers ‘transformational change’
    • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 10 hours ago

    Liverpool faces further government intervention as commissioners find ‘whole-council failure’: The levelling up secretary has announced that he is “minded to” expand intervention at Liverpool City Council by transferring the authority’s financial… dlvr.it/SWvgGc pic.twitter.com/cB7YeHZ9lE

    Room151 1 day ago

    Recovery position: withholding tax and the LGPS: Partner Content: Paul Sprenger from WTax talks to Room151 about how Local Government Pension Scheme funds could be missing out on millions of pounds of withholding tax recovery opportunities.… dlvr.it/SWsTfQ pic.twitter.com/z6aVMcaqHe

    Room151 2 days ago

    Treasurer societies favour permanent extension to IFRS 9 statutory override: Two treasurer society presidents have indicated their preference for the current five-year IFRS 9 statutory override to be made permanent following the government’s latest… dlvr.it/SWr3G4 pic.twitter.com/MGf9M5zC8Q

    Room151 3 days ago

    Luton Borough Council faces ‘grave’ £10m overspend: Luton Borough Council faces a £10m overspend in its 2022/23 budget which poses a “serious risk” to the authority’s financial sustainability. A report by Dev Gopal, director of finance, revenues[...] dlvr.it/SWmynD pic.twitter.com/ETDd7sQA48

    Room151 3 days ago

    Luton Borough Council faces ‘grave’ £10m overspend: Luton Borough Council faces a £10m overspend in its 2022/23 budget which poses a “serious risk” to the authority’s financial sustainability. room151.co.uk/funding/luton-… pic.twitter.com/XvyTZckW6m

    Room151 1 week ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 1 week ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 1 week ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Right to Buy figures “will not stack up”
  • Next story News Roundup: Pensions partnership, Icelandic losses recovered, Northern Ireland finances, coal investments

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares