• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Treasury Q&A: Innes Edwards, Edinburgh City Council

0
  • by Guest
  • in Interviews · Treasury
  • — 3 Mar, 2016

The CIPFA Scottish Treasury Management Forum saw issues such as loans charges and the struggle to attract spending by developers at the top of the conference agenda. Forum chairman and Edinburgh City Council treasury manager Innes Edwards gives his view of institutional investors, the impact of austerity on borrowing and investment diversification.

Room151: One theme among treasurers currently is whether it’s a good time to borrow (given long-term low interest rates). What’s your view on borrowing currently?

Innes Edwards

Innes Edwards

Innes Edwards (IE): Like most authorities we have been using internal balances to fund our capital financing requirement in the short term.  In fact, apart from some interest free loans from Salix (well you would take them wouldn’t you), we haven’t borrowed since 2012.

We heard at the workshop that public sector expenditure in the UK is projected to the smallest share of GDP since the 1940s.

Local authorities are taking their share of the downsizing which makes affording the revenue consequences of major capital expenditure very challenging.

As Capita showed, even with constant loans charges the effect of a reducing Net Revenue Expenditure is to increase the proportion of income spent on loans charges.

Although interest rates are historically low, most of the revenue provision relates to repaying the capital advance, which makes it difficult unless some additional income is generated.

However, in Edinburgh we still have an approved capital programme of £988m up to 2020/21, so local authorities are continuing to invest for the future in difficult circumstances.

Room151: We heard about a “wall of cash” sitting with institutional investors, and developers looking for places to invest. Why do you think local authorities are struggling to attract as much of it as they perhaps might?

IE: I think the constraining factors are different for developers and institutional investors. Developers seem to mitigate the construction risk by incremental development and sale, which is why the National Housing Trust approach – in which the local authority funded LLP guaranteed purchasing of homes at a fixed price from the developer once they were built – worked so well in opening up sites which otherwise might not have been developed.

Institutional investors are looking for yield, particularly for long-term liability matching.  The likes of private rented sector development, where there is high demand with more limited supply, might seem to fit the bill, but it was suggested that the volume needed to make it an economic model maybe isn’t there outside major conurbations.

Room151: Two years ago we heard treasurers were concentrating investment risk in too few places. This year we heard from Arlingclose that 64% of their clients’ assets are held in unsecured bank deposits. Has diversification gone far enough in your opinion?

IE: I agree with Arlingclose although, compared with two years ago, I believe there is a significantly increased level of diversification.

The second and third largest counterparty exposures of Scottish local authorities in the figures this year were UK Treasury Bills and other local authorities.

There is also increased use of money market funds, which themselves give a level of diversification, and the remaining investments were with a wider range of institutions.

It’s appropriate for each authority to consider their appetite for risk, which is why the investment regulations give authorities the powers to make whatever investments they consider appropriate as long as elected members approve the investments in advance having considered the risks involved.

However, some authorities do still have a significant proportion of their investments unsecured with a single counter party and I am personally not sure that’s so appropriate, post the new bail in regime.  Or, maybe I am just a born worrier.

Room151: We heard that treasury investing is becoming more like pension investing. What’s your view of the range of opportunities and asset classes that treasurers should consider?

That is true to an extent, but there aren’t the debt-free authorities in Scotland so the investment horizon here is inevitably somewhat shorter.

Local authority pension funds can withstand a greater level of volatility and can tie their monies up for much longer periods to harvest the illiquidity premium in direct lending, and other credit opportunities for example.

I did a presentation at CIPFA’s main capital and treasury management conference in October where I suggested that local authorities should seek to take on sovereign risk and, when lending to financial institutions, we should be seeking to be fixed charge holders on the basis that if my investment ranks above “Liquidators’ fees and expenses” I really fancy my chances of getting the investment back.

By sovereign risk I mean UK Treasury Bills, supra national bonds like the European Investment Bank, explicitly guaranteed bonds like Network Rail, or pseudo sovereigns like local authorities.  I think we should also look at capital market transactions, such as covered bonds and reverse REPO against Gilts, although I have found it frustratingly difficult to gain access to the REPO market.

Of the £1.6bn of Scottish LA investments, over £500m was sovereign risk with a small amount more if you drill through the MMFs to the underlying investments, so that’s a good start.

I’m lucky in having a very cost effective custody arrangement in our relationship with the pension fund.  It may be that a similar cross-sector custody arrangement would make the type of investment I think we should be looking at easier for LAs.

Room151: You commented at the conference that local authorities were getting “the worst of both worlds” where MiFID is concerned. Can you tell us what you meant by that? 

There have been two EU directives recently relating to investor protection.  For MiFID II we are going to be classified as retail clients so will have to go through the hassle of opting up to professional status with each institution we deal with.

However, under the directive for bank bail-ins, local authority deposits have no protection and are immediately above equity and junior debt in the bail in hierarchy.

Genuine retail clients, such as individuals and SMEs, have all their deposits higher in the hierarchy and even large corporates have their deposits protected up to £75k with each institution.

It seems inconsistent that we are afforded less protection under the compensation scheme than the biggest FSTE company, yet will be classified as de-facto retail clients under MiFID II?

Version 2

Room151: Overall, what were the key messages you took away from this year’s conference?

IE: Some of the key messages were:

  • The risks, whether relating to the global economy or more locally regarding the UK’s relationship with the EU, are higher than they have been for some time;
  • Local Authorities are continuing to invest for the future and Treasury Management strategies are playing a significant part in achieving that in difficult financial times;
  • The sophistication (and I am loathe to use the word ‘professionalism’, but in some ways it’s very appropriate) of cyber criminals we are faced with is frightening;
  • It seems that bank deposits will be out of scope of MiFID rather than being non-MiFID business but realistically we will be expected to opt up to professional clients; and
  • Innovative Capital Financing initiatives such as NHT and City Deal can and do make a significant difference for the better to peoples lives.

Innes Edwards is principal treasury & banking manager for the City of Edinburgh Council and chairman of the Scottish Treasury Management Forum.

Share

You may also like...

  • Renewable energy income generates LA interest Renewable energy income generates LA interest 12 Jan, 2012
  • LGA says audit delays prove  it was right over 2014 accounts deadline warning LGA says audit delays prove it was right over 2014 accounts deadline warning 30 Jul, 2019
  • Cash management in an age of uncertainty 2 Apr, 2020
  • Business Lending Bank could help LA loan schemes Business Lending Bank could help LA loan schemes 15 Oct, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    ESG presents LGPS with investment innovation opportunities: Sponsored interview: Dawn Turner of Quinbrook talks about the opportunities in environmental, social and governance issues for LGPS. LGPS has the opportunity to innovate in its investment… dlvr.it/RtyK3Y pic.twitter.com/swAksOAXYQ

    Room151 1 day ago

    The opportunity in the UK renewables and grid support market as UK looks to ‘build back better’: Sponsored article: Mark Burrows and Rosalind Smith-Maxwell examine infrastructure opportunities emerging from efforts to meet the UK’s net zero target.… dlvr.it/RtyJyz pic.twitter.com/BQCYQZQpi2

    Room151 1 day ago

    McCloud consultation ends with “greater security” for LGPS members: The government’s consultation on LGPS, Catherine McFadyen argues, closes with a decision which avoids forcing members to make choices that could be “financially disadvantageous”. But… dlvr.it/RtxhL6

    Room151 2 days ago

    Could 2021 be less eventful for LGPS, please?: Barry McKay looks at McCloud, the 95k exit cap, employer risk and investments to see what to expect for LGPS in the coming year. On one hand, 2020 was in[...] dlvr.it/RtslFd pic.twitter.com/H4debuPmGG

    Room151 2 days ago

    Fixed income investing can help target both financial and sustainability targets: Sponsored article: Adam Whiteley offers a guide to the ESG benefits of investing in fixed income. Investing responsibly in fixed income can be crucial for local government… dlvr.it/Rtsl9h pic.twitter.com/khJL1xNfGh

    Room151 3 days ago

    Going beyond the standard metrics for climate change: Sponsored article: With climate change an investment imperative and an imminent reporting requirement, Ritesh Bamania argues UK pension schemes should look beyond today’s standard metrics. With… dlvr.it/RtnpLS pic.twitter.com/6ABaFHyS9I

    Room151 4 days ago

    LGPS webinar: Governance the key to TCFD implementation: LGPS funds have been warned that governance is it at the here of Whitehall plans to impose a new climate reporting regime on pension funds. In January the Department for[...] dlvr.it/RtjwNq pic.twitter.com/YMiMdmRyzU

    Room151 4 days ago

    LGPS webinar: Central bank management of bond purchasing could affect all asset classes: When the government debt caused by the pandemic is eventually tackled there may be a huge impact on assets of all classes, according to a leading investment expert… dlvr.it/RtjwJx pic.twitter.com/7v8K5vMYHo

    Room151 4 days ago

    #LGPS readers...what to do about #bonds? room151.co.uk/blogs/lgps-web… @BrunelPP 's new CIO, David Vickers tackles a problematic area #centralbanks #assetallocation #fixedincome pic.twitter.com/yUJr0azbKv

    Room151 4 days ago

    LGPS Challenges: Balancing Realpolitik and responsible investment: Elizabeth M. Carey warns of the perils of an ESG echo chamber as countries outside the West continue to invest in fossil fuels. Anyone working with the LGPS probably feels[...] dlvr.it/RtjMpq pic.twitter.com/MykIYxuYri

    Room151 1 week ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 1 week ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 1 week ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story News Round-up: Investment portal launched, Scottish tax reforms, Tullet Prebon and ICAP, budget cuts and pay transparency
  • Next story David Green: All the fun of fair value

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.