• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Queen’s Speech confirms planning reforms

    May 10, 2022

  • 18,000 affordable houses lost through ‘permitted development’

    May 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Watchdogs raise worries over value for money on Scottish councils’ private finance deals

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Funding · Treasury
  • — 28 Jan, 2020

Scottish councils have been incentivised to overlook value for money when weighing up how to finance infrastructure spending, according to spending watchdogs.

A report by the Accounts Commission and Auditor General assessed the operation of the Private Finance Initiative model and its successors north of the border.

3rd LATIF NORTH
March 25th, 2020, Manchester
Council treasury investment & borrowing

It found that, because the Scottish government contributes to annual repayments on private funding projects, local authorities are likely to choose such schemes over other financing routes.

The report said: “A council considering building a new asset, for example, is therefore unlikely to consider alternative financing routes as it would have to meet all of the project costs rather than a proportion of them.

“Scottish government support therefore makes private financing a more affordable prospect for councils.

“This means that affordability, rather than value for money, becomes the focus of an individual public sector organisation’s decision-making.”

The report studied the operation of the Non-Profit Distributing (NPD) and hub models introduced by the Scottish government to replace PFI.

It said that guidance by the Scottish Futures Trust (SFT) states that councils should consider factors including service design, site selectin and community benefits when assessing business cases for financing specific programmes.

However, it said: “During our examination of a sample of NPD and hub projects, we found that the SFT’s and individual public sector bodies’ assessments focused on the benefits to be delivered from the project compared to the costs incurred.”

The report said that a consequence of councils paying a proportion of the annual commitments for their privately-finance projects is that they have “less flexibility when setting their annual budgets, and potentially less funding available for other services”.

“In deciding whether to pursue and accept the provision of Scottish Government funding,” the watchdogs said, “it is important that councils and other public sector bodies consider the extent of future financial commitments carefully, as well as issues such as contract length and loss of control of the assets, when deciding whether to proceed with privately financed projects”.

Working with councils and other public sector bodies, the SFT set up five hub companies (hubs) between 2010 and 2012 on behalf of the Scottish government.

The report said: “The hub model has enabled private finance to be obtained for smaller community-based projects, but some aspects of competition are limited.

“Hub structures and governance are complex, and councils and other public bodies have mixed views about how well hubs are supporting their aims.”

The report found that the Scottish public sector is contracted to pay a total of £40.1bn in annual payments between 1998/99 and 2047/48 under current PFI, NPD and hub contracts.

Although contracts cover maintenance and service costs over a period of decades, the authors said: “This is over four times the capital value of the assets developed.”

A statement from the Scottish government said it no longer used NPD or hub schemes.

It added: “NPD and private financing through hub companies has enabled £3.3bn of additional investment in Scotland’s infrastructure that would not otherwise have been possible.”

“The value of investing in infrastructure goes beyond the physical homes, schools and hospitals. It has the capacity to unlock economic potential, support jobs, and enable our businesses and communities to grow – as outlined in our national infrastructure mission.”

The Scottish government is set to unveil a refreshed Infrastructure Investment Plan by June, and is considering a new iteration of its private financing model.

In April last year, the SFT shortlisted options included the Mutual Investment Model (MIM), originally developed by the Welsh Government, an evolved version of PFI and also NPD (for comparison).

In the Welsh version of MIM the public sector has a 20% shareholding in the SPVs set up to construct and manage assets.

The Office for National Statistics has reviewed this structure against Eurostat guidance and has classified it as being under private sector control, which allows investment to be funded from revenue without impacting upon the Welsh Government’s capital budget.

The Room151 Weekly Newsletter covers local government treasury and pension investment, funding, development, resources and technical finance. Register here. 

The LGPS Quarterly Briefing focuses purely on pension fund investment. Register here.

Share

You may also like...

  • Liability benchmark ‘should not be mandatory’ 29th Apr, 2022
  • Levelling up’s ‘tyranny of competitive funding’ 25th Mar, 2022
  • Treasury year in review: inflation, regulation, borrowing and investment ups and downs 9th Dec, 2021
  • Inflation spike creates watching brief for treasury officers 24th Jun, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 22 hours ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 2 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 2 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 3 days ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 3 days ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 4 days ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

    Room151 5 days ago

    Rate rise represents ‘fastest increase in borrowing costs in 25 years’: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans analyses the rationale for the Bank of England’s latest rise in the Official Bank Rate and assesses the likely outcome of… dlvr.it/SQ33k3 pic.twitter.com/A81yiS1UgN

    Room151 5 days ago

    The Liability Benchmark, very much unloved at the recent Room151 treasury briefing, receives a much more positive assessment from Jackie Shute. There’s ‘no better tool for treasury portfolio management’, she says. #localgov #finance room151.co.uk/treasury/in-pr…

    Room151 5 days ago

    In praise of the Liability Benchmark: Jackie Shute responds to recent criticisms of the framework used to plan the future borrowing requirements of a local authority. I’m not suggesting that this debate will have the same[...] dlvr.it/SQ2cGf pic.twitter.com/4rqXTpHC9A

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story A pension pool model for climate action
  • Next story Council bills for homelessness spiral over budget

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares