• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Watchdogs raise worries over value for money on Scottish councils’ private finance deals

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Funding · Treasury
  • — 28 Jan, 2020

Scottish councils have been incentivised to overlook value for money when weighing up how to finance infrastructure spending, according to spending watchdogs.

A report by the Accounts Commission and Auditor General assessed the operation of the Private Finance Initiative model and its successors north of the border.

3rd LATIF NORTH
March 25th, 2020, Manchester
Council treasury investment & borrowing

It found that, because the Scottish government contributes to annual repayments on private funding projects, local authorities are likely to choose such schemes over other financing routes.

The report said: “A council considering building a new asset, for example, is therefore unlikely to consider alternative financing routes as it would have to meet all of the project costs rather than a proportion of them.

“Scottish government support therefore makes private financing a more affordable prospect for councils.

“This means that affordability, rather than value for money, becomes the focus of an individual public sector organisation’s decision-making.”

The report studied the operation of the Non-Profit Distributing (NPD) and hub models introduced by the Scottish government to replace PFI.

It said that guidance by the Scottish Futures Trust (SFT) states that councils should consider factors including service design, site selectin and community benefits when assessing business cases for financing specific programmes.

However, it said: “During our examination of a sample of NPD and hub projects, we found that the SFT’s and individual public sector bodies’ assessments focused on the benefits to be delivered from the project compared to the costs incurred.”

The report said that a consequence of councils paying a proportion of the annual commitments for their privately-finance projects is that they have “less flexibility when setting their annual budgets, and potentially less funding available for other services”.

“In deciding whether to pursue and accept the provision of Scottish Government funding,” the watchdogs said, “it is important that councils and other public sector bodies consider the extent of future financial commitments carefully, as well as issues such as contract length and loss of control of the assets, when deciding whether to proceed with privately financed projects”.

Working with councils and other public sector bodies, the SFT set up five hub companies (hubs) between 2010 and 2012 on behalf of the Scottish government.

The report said: “The hub model has enabled private finance to be obtained for smaller community-based projects, but some aspects of competition are limited.

“Hub structures and governance are complex, and councils and other public bodies have mixed views about how well hubs are supporting their aims.”

The report found that the Scottish public sector is contracted to pay a total of £40.1bn in annual payments between 1998/99 and 2047/48 under current PFI, NPD and hub contracts.

Although contracts cover maintenance and service costs over a period of decades, the authors said: “This is over four times the capital value of the assets developed.”

A statement from the Scottish government said it no longer used NPD or hub schemes.

It added: “NPD and private financing through hub companies has enabled £3.3bn of additional investment in Scotland’s infrastructure that would not otherwise have been possible.”

“The value of investing in infrastructure goes beyond the physical homes, schools and hospitals. It has the capacity to unlock economic potential, support jobs, and enable our businesses and communities to grow – as outlined in our national infrastructure mission.”

The Scottish government is set to unveil a refreshed Infrastructure Investment Plan by June, and is considering a new iteration of its private financing model.

In April last year, the SFT shortlisted options included the Mutual Investment Model (MIM), originally developed by the Welsh Government, an evolved version of PFI and also NPD (for comparison).

In the Welsh version of MIM the public sector has a 20% shareholding in the SPVs set up to construct and manage assets.

The Office for National Statistics has reviewed this structure against Eurostat guidance and has classified it as being under private sector control, which allows investment to be funded from revenue without impacting upon the Welsh Government’s capital budget.

The Room151 Weekly Newsletter covers local government treasury and pension investment, funding, development, resources and technical finance. Register here. 

The LGPS Quarterly Briefing focuses purely on pension fund investment. Register here.

Share

You may also like...

  • BGC acquires Sterling International Brokers BGC acquires Sterling International Brokers 5 Mar, 2013
  • Low PWLB rates prompt borrowing surge Low PWLB rates prompt borrowing surge 19 Jun, 2019
  • Accounting for investments: time to get under the bonnet Accounting for investments: time to get under the bonnet 19 Feb, 2013
  • Finance appointments, Sandwell insources finance, LGPS equity returns, Edinburgh finance officer jailed Finance appointments, Sandwell insources finance, LGPS equity returns, Edinburgh finance officer jailed 7 Jan, 2014

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 11 hours ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 1 day ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 1 day ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 2 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 1 week ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Is local government funding “broken”?: Andrew Hardingham looks at the underlying issues that caused more than a third of respondents in the Room151/CCLA treasury survey to say that the funding system for local govenrment is[...] dlvr.it/RsYhsg pic.twitter.com/plNp7Ayys6

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    GameStop: A lesson for LGPS in the risks of short selling: Day traders coordinating their efforts through the social media platform Reddit have not only boosted the stock of US GameStop, but also badly hurt hedge funds engaged in huge bets[...] dlvr.it/RsGdVV pic.twitter.com/NTMC3j6J2u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Room151 panel backs unitary councils and devolution: Bigger isn’t always better when it comes to local government, according to Sir Bob Kerslake, chair of the Peabody Trust, but “ …we need to move to unitary government and[...] dlvr.it/RsFPNv pic.twitter.com/lT4eCi0TmV

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story A pension pool model for climate action
  • Next story Council bills for homelessness spiral over budget

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.