• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Queen’s Speech confirms planning reforms

    May 10, 2022

  • 18,000 affordable houses lost through ‘permitted development’

    May 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

What would negative sterling interest rates mean for UK money market funds?

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Treasury
  • — 25 Feb, 2021

Bank of England. Photo (cropped) by Bank of England, Flickr.

Sponsored article: Paul Mueller argues there are “few potential alternatives to money market funds for those where capital preservation and daily liquidity remain paramount.”

The significant impact of Covid-19 on the global economy has led governments and central banks to take unprecedented action to support economies and markets. In the UK, the Bank of England (BoE) cut its Bank Rate to an historic low of 0.1% in March 2020. At the time, the BoE viewed this as the “effective lower bound”, below which any further reduction in interest rates would be deemed ineffective, or even counterproductive.

What are the chances of a move to negative rates?

At the 3rd February Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting the BoE surprised markets delivering a more upbeat view of the UK’s recovery prospects. The BoE highlighted that although they are tasking Banks to prepare for the prospect of negative rates this does not necessarily imply they are going to implement them.

The results of a review by the Prudential Regulatory Authority, into the potential impact of negative rates, concluded there could be operational risks to banks if they did not have at least a six-month period to prepare for negative interest rates. As a result of the latest BoE views and progress on Covid-19 vaccinations, markets have reduced expectations for negative rates to just a small risk in the first half of 2022.

Recent UK data has also been a little better. The manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index (PMI), which measures economic trends, was revised to 54.1 in January 2021, from a preliminary of 52.9. (A PMI above 50 represents an expansion versus the previous month, while under 50 represents a contraction).

The final services PMI for January printed at 39.5, a notable upgrade on the flash estimate but still its weakest level since May 2020. The data point to continuing challenges in the UK labour market, potentially weighing on the recovery even as restrictions are eased. However, the latest provisional estimates for Q4 GDP came in higher than expected putting fourth quarter year-on-year GDP at -7.8% (versus -8.6% previously).

Invesco Global Liquidity team’s central case view continues to be that we do not expect negative UK interest rates. However, in these unprecedented economic times they cannot be ruled out completely. The key will be how the economy performs when Covid-19 restrictions are eased, or removed, and how vaccinations move the population towards “herd immunity”. The labour market will obviously be important and the unwind of furlough schemes will be one to watch.

How could a negative rate impact the yield on sterling money market funds (MMFs)?

Regarding the effect on MMFs if sterling yields did go negative, under the latest regulations for European MMFs which went into effect in 2019, the Reverse Distribution Mechanism (which allowed the cancellation of fund units to offset negative returns) is no longer permitted. As a result, MMFs with a negative yield can effectively only be offered using accumulation classes. Accordingly, all investors would need to be moved to corresponding accumulation classes. Unlike distribution classes, which typically transact at a price of 1.00, an accumulation class transacts at a variable price, which moves in line with daily yield.

What are the alternatives to potential negative rates?

Unless investors are willing and able to take additional risk (either higher credit risk, lower liquidity or a combination of both), there are few potential alternatives to MMFs for those where capital preservation and daily liquidity remain paramount.

For investors who can segment their liquidity into longer-dated tranches, we are seeing some explore other pooled funds, including exchange traded funds. Understanding how these funds are managed is essential for investors to identify products that meet their needs.

Paul Mueller is head of global liquidity, EMEA portfolios, Invesco Global Liquidity.

Photo (cropped) by Bank of England, Flickr.

FREE monthly newsletters
Subscribe to Room151 Newsletters

Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
Sign up here with a .gov.uk email address

Room151 Webinars
Visit the Room151 channel

 

INVESTMENT RISKS: The value of investments and any income will fluctuate (this may partly be the result of exchange rate fluctuations) and investors may not get back the full amount invested. An investment in a money market fund (MMF) is not guaranteed. An investment in a MMF is different from an investment in deposits and is capable of fluctuation; as a result, investors may not get back the full amount invested. A MMF does not rely on external support for guaranteeing the liquidity of the fund or stabilising the net asset value (NAV) per unit or share. The risk of loss of the principal is to be borne by the investor.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: Where individuals or the business have expressed opinions, they are based on current market conditions, they may differ from those of other investment professionals and are subject to change without notice. Issued by Invesco Asset Management Limited, Perpetual Park, Perpetual Park Drive, Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire RG9 1HH, UK. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Share

You may also like...

  • “Localism, localism, localism”, or simply time for better funding 19th Apr, 2021
  • Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome 12th Jan, 2021
  • Good LGPS risk management is ‘living in the past, present and future’ 13th Dec, 2021
  • Fixed income investing can help target both financial and sustainability targets 3rd Mar, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 8 hours ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 1 day ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 1 day ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 2 days ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 2 days ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 3 days ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

    Room151 4 days ago

    Rate rise represents ‘fastest increase in borrowing costs in 25 years’: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans analyses the rationale for the Bank of England’s latest rise in the Official Bank Rate and assesses the likely outcome of… dlvr.it/SQ33k3 pic.twitter.com/A81yiS1UgN

    Room151 4 days ago

    The Liability Benchmark, very much unloved at the recent Room151 treasury briefing, receives a much more positive assessment from Jackie Shute. There’s ‘no better tool for treasury portfolio management’, she says. #localgov #finance room151.co.uk/treasury/in-pr…

    Room151 4 days ago

    In praise of the Liability Benchmark: Jackie Shute responds to recent criticisms of the framework used to plan the future borrowing requirements of a local authority. I’m not suggesting that this debate will have the same[...] dlvr.it/SQ2cGf pic.twitter.com/4rqXTpHC9A

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Stephen Fitzgerald: “Fast cash” may provide the answer to critical budget challenges
  • Next story ‘Better governance and greater transparency’ could help improve financial decision making

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares