• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Inflation ‘biggest concern for LGPS professionals’

    May 20, 2022

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

CIPFA’s Resilience Index: laudable but flawed

0
  • by Guest
  • in 151 News · Blogs · Technical
  • — 15 Jan, 2019

Christian Wall gives his take on CIPFA’s new tool to compare councils’ financial performance

Just before Christmas CIPFA summarised the initial findings of its Financial Resilience Index.  The index as it stands is flawed, although some problems merely reflect the “nature of the beast” and are common to all quantitative credit and financial resilience models.  However, there are a number of issues that should be addressed and as yet there is no clear explanation regarding the real purpose of the index and who is supposed to benefit from its publication.

Local authorities are complex democratically accountable organisations whose long-term financial performance depends on the Government, statutory requirements and a complex interlocking web of financial and non-financial decisions over a prolonged period of time.  Other than short-term financial viability, they simply cannot be understood using a number of somewhat arbitrary indicators.

Identifying the methodological and systemic problems of the index is easier than addressing the existential questions.  As it stands and with the caveat that some points are inextricably interlinked:

  • Manyof the indicators are auto-correlated and / or measure the same things indifferent ways.  For example, there are seven indicators dealing with reserves, many of which require interpretation to understand properly.
  • The index is essentially retrospective.  All quantitative assessment frameworks are “point in time” assessments that are largely backward looking.  The value and great skill has always been and will always remain the judgement that extends that assessment reliably into the future.
  • Data without context is meaningless.  Effective interpretation and correct responses to the findings of the index require context and other data.
  • The index is tautological.  As the service focus is on social care, by definition districts will be more resilient than counties and unitaries.  The only remedy is to selectively apply indicators thereby losing sector-wide comparability.
  • There is a short-term, selective focus.  Until recently, many assumed districts were at the greatest risk of financial failure.  That counties and unitiaries are now deemed so, is no excuse to ignore lower tier service pressures altogether.  If the index is to be used over time, it cannot be subject to frequent alteration to reflect the issues of the day.

Local authorities routinely publish a wealth of financial information, well beyond that of any other sector in the UK. Coupled with the voluminous returns to Government, at first glance it appears odd that the index is even needed and it is difficult to see how the index can address sector funding issues in the near future.

Key partsof the Government believe that local authorities can make further “efficiencies” and those currently in difficulty are in that position due to idiosyncratic failings.  Anyone believing the index will change that immediately is naïve.  Aside from policy, causality and moral hazard will always be considerations; government cannot “reward” the reckless or incompetent. Furthermore, it will be difficult for councils and the Government to resist using the index for their own ends, particularly “fair” funding.

The most likely outcome is many councillors and officers will raise real and spurious objections to the results, or misuse them, thus defeating its purpose.  Anyone who thinks some councils will not use a “good” result to support unsustainable decisions about budgets and council tax is probably deluded.  Anyone who thinks many in opposition to a council will use “poor” scores to do anything other than score cheap points is probably “somewhat misguided”.  Most commentators lack the time, expertise and resources to do in-depth analyses, so the risk of superficial and headline-grabbing pronouncements is great.  Local government is not the NHS: financial failure in the NHS usually results in some public sympathy and additional funding; in local government, opprobrium and commissioners.

Ultimately,if the financial resilience index is required, it is due to a collective failure on the part of councils, the Government and CIPFA to deliver a system of financial reporting and accountability that is transparent, easily understood and relevant.  If the energy being expended on the index had instead been spent on simplifying the accounts and financial reporting, while vastly improving the communication of financial issues inside and outside councils, there would be no real need for an index.  Reading local authority accounts and budgets is currently a masochistic exercise.

Even themost jaundiced observer is almost certainly incorrect if they believe that CIPFA’s motives are anything other than laudable.  However, it should have been obvious that the proposals would be met with a degree of hostility and incredulity.  It should have been even more obvious that the interests of various stakeholders are not aligned and that it was, and is, highly likely that even the most objective of indices will be used to buttress already entrenched views and tangentially related politics, largely to the detriment of S151 Officers whom the index is probably designed to help.

Christian Wall is a director at financial adviser PFM.

Get the Room 151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Councils ‘becoming more involved in direct delivery of housing’ 28th Feb, 2022
  • Financial pressures loom for 2023 and beyond 30th Mar, 2021
  • Spending review set to push up council tax 18th Oct, 2021
  • Funding reforms pose a ‘threat’ to financial planning while some councils benefit 28th Jan, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    2022 LGPS valuations: difficult discussions in uncertain times: Michelle Doman looks at the impact of inflationary pressures, the war in Ukraine, climate risk and Covid-19 on employer contributions. At the start of 2022, for Local Government Pension… dlvr.it/SQlvy9 pic.twitter.com/Dd0lrHjWNb

    Room151 1 day ago

    Investing today: nowhere to hide: Partner Content: Alex Stanley from Ardea Investment Management suggests that investors have few places to hide amid a synchronised sell-off in both bonds and equities. However, there are catalysts that[...] dlvr.it/SQlNVC pic.twitter.com/KkGGnduzPL

    Room151 2 days ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 2 days ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 2 days ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 2 days ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 3 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 3 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 3 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 3 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 4 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story NAO worried by local authority governance
  • Next story Sunak says councils are over the worst

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares