• Home
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Conference
  • TMS Links
  • Calendar
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • LGPS infrastructure partnership invests £1.8bn in renewables

    December 12, 2019

  • Brunel appoints global high alpha managers

    December 11, 2019

  • City of London completes £250m debt deal

    December 11, 2019

  • Mystery bidder appointed on £250m waste contract

    December 11, 2019

  • Investors withdraw from property fund

    December 11, 2019

  • Highland councillors back tourist tax

    December 11, 2019

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Jobs

CIPFA’s Resilience Index: laudable but flawed

0
  • by Guest
  • in 151 News · Blogs · Technical
  • — 15 Jan, 2019

Christian Wall gives his take on CIPFA’s new tool to compare councils’ financial performance

Just before Christmas CIPFA summarised the initial findings of its Financial Resilience Index.  The index as it stands is flawed, although some problems merely reflect the “nature of the beast” and are common to all quantitative credit and financial resilience models.  However, there are a number of issues that should be addressed and as yet there is no clear explanation regarding the real purpose of the index and who is supposed to benefit from its publication.

Local authorities are complex democratically accountable organisations whose long-term financial performance depends on the Government, statutory requirements and a complex interlocking web of financial and non-financial decisions over a prolonged period of time.  Other than short-term financial viability, they simply cannot be understood using a number of somewhat arbitrary indicators.

Identifying the methodological and systemic problems of the index is easier than addressing the existential questions.  As it stands and with the caveat that some points are inextricably interlinked:

  • Manyof the indicators are auto-correlated and / or measure the same things indifferent ways.  For example, there are seven indicators dealing with reserves, many of which require interpretation to understand properly.
  • The index is essentially retrospective.  All quantitative assessment frameworks are “point in time” assessments that are largely backward looking.  The value and great skill has always been and will always remain the judgement that extends that assessment reliably into the future.
  • Data without context is meaningless.  Effective interpretation and correct responses to the findings of the index require context and other data.
  • The index is tautological.  As the service focus is on social care, by definition districts will be more resilient than counties and unitaries.  The only remedy is to selectively apply indicators thereby losing sector-wide comparability.
  • There is a short-term, selective focus.  Until recently, many assumed districts were at the greatest risk of financial failure.  That counties and unitiaries are now deemed so, is no excuse to ignore lower tier service pressures altogether.  If the index is to be used over time, it cannot be subject to frequent alteration to reflect the issues of the day.

Local authorities routinely publish a wealth of financial information, well beyond that of any other sector in the UK. Coupled with the voluminous returns to Government, at first glance it appears odd that the index is even needed and it is difficult to see how the index can address sector funding issues in the near future.

Key partsof the Government believe that local authorities can make further “efficiencies” and those currently in difficulty are in that position due to idiosyncratic failings.  Anyone believing the index will change that immediately is naïve.  Aside from policy, causality and moral hazard will always be considerations; government cannot “reward” the reckless or incompetent. Furthermore, it will be difficult for councils and the Government to resist using the index for their own ends, particularly “fair” funding.

The most likely outcome is many councillors and officers will raise real and spurious objections to the results, or misuse them, thus defeating its purpose.  Anyone who thinks some councils will not use a “good” result to support unsustainable decisions about budgets and council tax is probably deluded.  Anyone who thinks many in opposition to a council will use “poor” scores to do anything other than score cheap points is probably “somewhat misguided”.  Most commentators lack the time, expertise and resources to do in-depth analyses, so the risk of superficial and headline-grabbing pronouncements is great.  Local government is not the NHS: financial failure in the NHS usually results in some public sympathy and additional funding; in local government, opprobrium and commissioners.

Ultimately,if the financial resilience index is required, it is due to a collective failure on the part of councils, the Government and CIPFA to deliver a system of financial reporting and accountability that is transparent, easily understood and relevant.  If the energy being expended on the index had instead been spent on simplifying the accounts and financial reporting, while vastly improving the communication of financial issues inside and outside councils, there would be no real need for an index.  Reading local authority accounts and budgets is currently a masochistic exercise.

Even themost jaundiced observer is almost certainly incorrect if they believe that CIPFA’s motives are anything other than laudable.  However, it should have been obvious that the proposals would be met with a degree of hostility and incredulity.  It should have been even more obvious that the interests of various stakeholders are not aligned and that it was, and is, highly likely that even the most objective of indices will be used to buttress already entrenched views and tangentially related politics, largely to the detriment of S151 Officers whom the index is probably designed to help.

Christian Wall is a director at financial adviser PFM.

Get the Room 151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • 2012: risk assets up, charity down 2012: risk assets up, charity down 2 Jan, 2013
  • The big bond sell off and prospects for fixed income The big bond sell off and prospects for fixed income 11 Jul, 2013
  • Markets update: Euroland, US & China Markets update: Euroland, US & China 9 Jul, 2012
  • James Bevan: Negative rates – are they kill or cure? 11 Feb, 2016

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Court rejects NHS trusts’ claim for millions in business rates relief: A judge yesterday threw out a claim by 17 NHS trusts that they are charities and should receive millions of pounds of business rates relief. Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation[...] dlvr.it/RL8F7D pic.twitter.com/fxt6Sor3Q7

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Authorities turn away from PWLB in favour of borrowing from peers: Councils borrowed just £80m through the Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) during the first full month since the Treasury’s rate rise, a mere 4% of August’s total. Just two authorities[...] dlvr.it/RL8F57 pic.twitter.com/zIOf1KlNpc

    Room 151 4 days ago

    County introduces new rules after £9.1m funds gaffe: A report to Hertfordshire’s most recent audit committee meeting said the “treasury control failure” had come to light in August, one day after the multi-million-pound redemption was not received.… dlvr.it/RL5DP0 pic.twitter.com/6LvY71zUew

    Room 151 4 days ago

    News just in - #WorkingtonWoman is believed to represent roughly half the electorate in Workington.

    Room 151 5 days ago

    LGPS urged to put the ‘social’ back into ESG: LGPS committee members and managers have been asked to elevate the importance of the “S” in ESG (environmental, social and governance) to help protect workers’ rights as the world confronts[...] dlvr.it/RL1c9p pic.twitter.com/xv590d3qm8

    Room 151 5 days ago

    Room 151’s top 10 news stories of 2019 room151.co.uk/treasury/room-… #localgov

    Room 151 6 days ago

    Room 151’s top news stories of 2019: As an eventful year for local authority treasurers draws to a close, Room 151 takes a look at the top 10 stories from the sector during 2019. 10. Spending watchdog[...] dlvr.it/RKy49q

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Council files £130m claim against PFI contractor for post-Grenfell estate costs: London Borough of Camden is suing a former PFI partner and its main subcontractors for £130m for costs relating to the evacuation of one of its housing estates the week[...] dlvr.it/RKkR8C pic.twitter.com/zIfQcikMjq

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Review highlights ongoing financial management issues at Northamptonshire: Northamptonshire County Council’s new section 151 officer should draw up plans to repatriate powers from government commissioners amid ongoing problems with financial management,… dlvr.it/RKjLkN pic.twitter.com/tQIxMDawQV

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story NAO worried by local authority governance
  • Next story Sunak says councils are over the worst

© Copyright 2019 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK