• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Chris Buss: LGPS pooling still needs reform

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Chris Buss · LGPSi
  • — 26 Jun, 2018

Photo (cropped): David J, Flickr CCO

Pooling is well under way but there remains outstanding issues for some. Chris Buss argues funds should be allowed to shop around pools to find the best investment products.

When the facts change, I change my mind.

The quote above is attributed to John Maynard Keynes and is a warning against being dogmatic. As circumstances change what may have the right solution in the past is, perhaps, no longer the correct solution now, or in the future. Events move on, and solutions must keep up with events.

However, in the public sector we, perhaps, have a tendency not to move on but to stick to a single solution without considering whether it is out of date.

In my opinion, which may not count for much, this is where the LGPS, at least in London, now finds itself with regard to collective investment or, as the government like to call it, pooling.

Coming together

The birth of collective investment, as a concept in London, dates back some six years. It was clear from studies commissioned by the Society of London Treasurers that the then 33 borough-based funds had diverse performance levels, both in terms of fees paid and fund performance, and that between us we were paying the same providers different sums for the same product.


Room151’s Annual Conference – September 20th, 2018, London Stock Exchange
Local Authority Treasurers’ Investment Forum and FDs’ Summit


So, the concept of joining together to seek fee savings through collective investment was conceived. A little later, the idea that the then structure of each fund effectively doing their own thing was not the most effective use of resources took root nationally.

The government consulted and then issued regulations on pooling. As a consequence, a significant regulatory infrastructure has developed.

The national pooling arrangements have evolved into a system of pools in England that, in the main, do not have the tight fit for geographic identity that London has but, instead, have been formed from like- minded council’s being able to get together.

This was not the position in London. The London CIV has moved from a local voluntary initiative to a system of compulsion both at national and, if we are not careful, also at a regional level.

The borough funds have widely different investment strategies due to cash flow needs, funding levels and differing appetites for risk. This makes a rigid pooling structure difficult, if not impossible, to implement due, in part, to the wide range of funds in the pool.

This was far less of an issue with a voluntary scheme which would give inherent flexibility that the regulated CIV structure does not.

Rethink

The structure in London needs a rethink, which has happened.

But what is now being proposed fails to address the question of choice. Indeed, part of the issue lies elsewhere and needs a rethink by central government.

The voluntary arrangements envisaged funds opting in and, when originally conceived, would have enabled funds to buy into pools other than their host as further collective arrangements came into being.

This option of opting into products provided by other pools was denied by government despite strong representations by many funds and removes one of the key elements of any successful economic system: competition.

The pooling arrangement has effectively created a group of monopoly providers of products to the member funds within each pool.

Anyone who understands basic economics understands that monopoly providers are usually a “bad thing” for those who are forced to buy services from them, because a monopoly provider often provides what is easiest, cheapest and most convenient for them to offer rather than what the consumer needs or wants.

In the pools with a smaller number of fund members, the funds may have greater leverage over the provider.

However, the London arrangement, with more than 30 funds involved, means that the needs of individual funds are less likely to be heard.

Employing more client engagement officers is unlikely to improve matters but instead increase the costs to constituent funds.

Similarly, a new (allegedly) slimline structure reduces accountability for those that own the vehicle that runs the pool.

Alternatives

A few months ago, five London funds, who felt that the pool wasn’t listening to them, created their own pooled mandate for fixed income. I suspect other similar initiatives will happen if pools do not respond quickly and positively enough to their memberships.

Pools, both in London and elsewhere, need to remember that they were created for the sole purpose of serving the needs of their member funds and are not there for their own self-justification. The operators are servants of the funds.

However, the current structure, in London at least, could, in some scenarios, see the operator becoming the masters and the funds subservient. In my view, not a desirable outcome.

In London we have seen that there is the potential for the pool becoming more and more involved in investment decisions at a lower level, and the funds left holding the financial consequences of those decisions.

I realise that some funds may be content with this situation which, I accept, is particularly unique to London. But I am not sure that this outcome is what we need.

This is because of who picks up the bill when it goes wrong. I know in other parts of the country the link between the fund and the funder is much more diverse, but in many London boroughs more than 85% of a fund’s membership is linked to the borough hosting the fund.

There is, therefore, a direct link between performance levels and future council tax levels, which is less evident in the counties and the former metropolitan county funds.

This, to me, presents a real issue in accountability particularly for a well-funded fund, which may have investment needs that a single pool cannot meet and would clearly be at risk, in some scenarios, of dumbing down.

In my view, anything that leads either to a levelling down of performance, or cross subsidy between funds, weakens the link back to the host council tax payer and reduces accountability.

Shortly, funds will have to give an account to government for the reasons why they haven’t yet pooled some of their assets.

I suspect that some of the submissions will make interesting reading. Some will I suspect have the simple explanation: “My pool currently doesn’t have what we need to meet our strategy.”

If that is the case, what happens next? Will government force a pool to open a mandate to take the requirements of the fund, or will they force the fund to change its strategy to meet what the pool has on offer. I suspect it will be the latter, confirming my fear that pools will be the masters.

Shopping around

So, what is the solution? Ideally, I would like government to rethink two issues: The notion of compulsory pooling and the ability of funds to shop around between pools.

Realistically, I can’t see the former happening, but the latter does have some merit. It would create competition between pools and competition, despite what some might think, has greater economic merit than a monopoly.

Government think again.

Chris Buss is executive director, resources and assets Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea.

The views in this article are personal and may not reflect the views of my employing authority.

Share

You may also like...

  • Webinar explores LGPS role in tackling climate crisis 29 Oct, 2020
  • Q&A: Jason Fletcher of LGPS Central on understanding investment management costs Q&A: Jason Fletcher of LGPS Central on understanding investment management costs 12 Dec, 2017
  • US Banks largely ‘out of the woods’ US Banks largely ‘out of the woods’ 15 Dec, 2011
  • €130bn Greek rescue package: key details & Eurogroup statement €130bn Greek rescue package: key details & Eurogroup statement 21 Feb, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 29 mins ago

    FDs’ Summit experts defend councils as MPs label property investment ‘risky’: As Room151’s FDs’ Summit conference explores local government’s investment in commercial property MPs once again lable it a “significant risk to government”. Once again MPs… dlvr.it/Rr7lZx pic.twitter.com/jPvcZjDAS4

    Room151 9 hours ago

    Global macro outlook: Virus versus vaccine: Sponsored article: Salman Ahmed argues monetary policy, a global vaccine rollout and fiscal stimulus are likely to put “upward pressure” on bond yields. Much like the latter half of 2020,[...] dlvr.it/Rr60nt pic.twitter.com/qsymBWmKmV

    Room151 1 day ago

    ‘Chasing yield’ not the best strategy as negative rates loom: Recent speculation that the UK may be heading toward negative interest rates prompts questions for treasury officers managing local authority funds at LATIF. Speculation is rife that the UK… dlvr.it/Rr3Mrj pic.twitter.com/wtxYAB20PO

    Room151 3 days ago

    Will new public procurement rules offer the best commercial results?: The government has issued a green paper on reforming procurement rules. Helen Randall and Rebecca Rees examine the proposals and argue they may not go far enough. The Cabinet… dlvr.it/Rqtw6T pic.twitter.com/9GiVTkL08U

    Room151 1 week ago

    The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk: Sponsored article: Lauren Sewell examines the prospects for long-term borrowing as Brexit settles and vaccines are deployed against Covid-19. On the 9th October 2019 Whitehall sent… dlvr.it/RqZXCr pic.twitter.com/PzgOZOGQ0k

    Room151 1 week ago

    ESG in liquidity: Sponsored article: Gavin Haywood looks at the integration of ESG in Federated Hermes’ money market funds. Federated Hermes has over 300 public sector clients invested in our AAA rated money[...] dlvr.it/RqZX5f pic.twitter.com/E87sBXsay8

    Room151 1 week ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 1 week ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 1 week ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 1 week ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 1 week ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 1 week ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

    Room151 1 month ago

    Room151’s top stories from a momentous year: 2020 was the year in which local government grappled with Covid-19, funding strains, controversy over borrowing rules and the threat of financial collapse. It has been an exhausting and historic[...] dlvr.it/RnlpZg pic.twitter.com/g3myNyox6J

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story New regs ‘push’ ESG on to pension trustees’ agenda
  • Next story Dan Bates: Searching last year’s accounts for signs of resilience

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK