• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as “disappointing”

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase

    June 23, 2022

  • UK Infrastructure Bank launches plan to deploy £22bn of investment

    June 23, 2022

  • LGA: councils facing service and job cuts due to National Living Wage increase

    June 21, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Council auditors are in ‘shackles’ and need to be released

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Technical
  • — 3 Aug, 2021

Photo by Gabrielle Henderson on Unsplash

Rebecca Keene writes that local government audit has become distracted by valuations and cash flow projections.

As we reach the end of July and what would be, pre-pandemic, the deadline for local authorities to publish a set of signed and fully audited accounts, I don’t think that it will take much more than the fingers on one hand to count how many audits of 2020-21 accounts have started, let alone finished.

The local authority accounts audit system is broken and the pandemic only served to widen the cracks that were already appearing. Expecting the few public sector specialist auditors in existence, to audit NHS and local government accounts in a four-month window, was never going to have a happy ending.

However, I don’t think that the issues are just about timing and resourcing. In my view, the whole focus of local government audits is wrong.


16 September 2021
London Stock Exchange or ONLINE
13th Local Authority Treasurers’ Investment Forum

Room151’s flagship annual conference. Free attendance for local government treasurers and section 151 officers.
Visit our conference page for more information
Lead sponsor CCLA
Public sector treasurers can register here


Focus

The move to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) was sensible, after all they represent the definitive approach to reporting an organisation’s financial position and, as councils have become more commercial, it is right that the way they report their finances should reflect that. Yes, it does mean that the accounts aren’t a particularly easy read, but a bit of imagination and a willingness to not dogmatically follow the layout and sequencing of CIPFA’s guidance notes can mitigate that (if only a little).

However, while I can accept the use of IFRS, the insistence of audit firms (and I know, to be fair, that much of their work is done at the behest of the Financial Reporting Council) on applying private sector principles to the audit public sector accounts bemuses and frustrates me in equal measure.

If I want to understand the financial health of a local authority, I want to assess the sustainability of income streams, levels of expenditure and the level of reserves and viability of any plans to use or replenish them. Alternatively, as a reader of the accounts, interested in knowing that public funds are being used appropriately, I want to know how the numbers shown and decisions may impact on council tax.

However, open any local government audit plan, or audit report, and you will see that two of the main risks identified are the valuation of assets and going concern.

Let’s start with going concern. The CIPFA code clearly states that “…an authority shall prepare its financial statements on a going concern basis…” and the notes go further setting out the reasons why it would not be appropriate for local authority accounts to be provided on anything other than a going concern basis.

Why then, do auditors need to spend so much time forensically studying cash flow projections to check that cash balances and liquidity are sustainable, with their technical teams insisting that the private sector going concern principles and tests are met regardless of any wider knowledge of the particular authority or even local government as a sector?

I can see the argument that going concern is just another way of assessing the financial health of an organisation, but is cash liquidity really that much of an indicator for a local authority with easy access to low cost short-term borrowing?

Pertinent questions

The obsession with private sector principles gets worse when the audit moves onto asset valuations. I understand that, for the private sector, the overstatement of the value of assets is a serious issue with such false accounting being used to obtain additional financing or inflate the share price, but what is the risk for a local authority of an asset’s value being either a little under or over stated?

I am not for one minute saying that valuations should not be checked but the additional time and expense incurred as a result of asset valuations having to be reviewed by specialist audit teams who challenge every assumption means that local authorities are essentially paying twice to get their assets valued. This seems to me a waste of public resources.

The movement in the value of an asset, be it up or down, does not impact on a council’s financial position, at least not in the context of its ability to continue to deliver services or its use of the public purse. There is a statutory override in place which means that the changes in value do not go into the general fund and have no impact on council tax.

Not only that, the fact that the valuation of assets gets pride of place as one of the big risks in the audit report means that the gaze of those charged with governance is drawn to the changes in value rather than asking the more pertinent questions.

 



Assuming these are investment properties, is the income being reported accurate? Is it sustainable? Do we understand the timing and impact of rent reviews? These are the factors that will impact on the long-term financial health of the authority, not annual fluctuations in value.

Yes, if a new asset has been purchased during the year questions should absolutely be asked of the value and whether the purchase was appropriate and due diligence undertaken properly but this check gets lost in a paragraph about value for money half way through the audit report.

If local government audits are going to get back on track and properly fulfil the role they need to play in providing reassurance on the financial health of authorities and identifying where there are causes for concern, audit teams need to be allowed to move away from the shackles the FRC is placing on them.

There is no need to adhere to the private sector auditing approach; ticking those boxes is taking time and resources away from reviewing all those things that makes the public sector what it is, even if that means a return to proper value for money assessments.

Rebecca Keene is deputy section officer at Broxbourne Council.

Photo by Gabrielle Henderson on Unsplash

More stories

MPs demand “urgent” action to repair local government audit

Stephen Sheen: FRC report fails to confront ‘mess’ in local government audit

—————

FREE monthly newsletters
Subscribe to Room151 Newsletters

Room151 Linkedin Community
Join here

Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
Sign up here with a .gov.uk email address

Room151 Webinars
Visit the Room151 channel

Share

You may also like...

  • How to be net zero by 2030 23rd Feb, 2022
  • ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays 13th May, 2022
  • Are central banks losing their independence? 17th Mar, 2021
  • Skills in short supply for local government audit 12th Oct, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as “disappointing”
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
    • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase
    • UK Infrastructure Bank launches plan to deploy £22bn of investment
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 6 days ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

    Room151 1 week ago

    Job Alert: Various Finance Roles: lnkd.in/eRKRvhJb pic.twitter.com/KkBrjXxAYD

    Room151 1 week ago

    MRP on capital loans: a step in the right direction: David Green says the latest government proposals on Minimum Revenue Provision should be welcomed by local authorities. There are still some unintended consequences, but the suggested approach for… dlvr.it/SSZ7JK pic.twitter.com/M1W9qVgYWN

    Room151 1 week ago

    MRP U-turn welcomed but ‘unintended consequences remain’: Local authority finance directors and treasury advisers have welcomed the government’s revised Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) proposals, while pointing out that some unintended consequences still… dlvr.it/SSWvY0 pic.twitter.com/sGglpVNFs3

    Room151 1 week ago

    Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’: The CEO at the London CIV pension pool has called for progress on pooling the assets of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to accelerate. Mike O’Donnell told… dlvr.it/SSWvWV pic.twitter.com/rE1NjbMCCq

    Room151 1 week ago

    Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’:The CEO at the London CIV pension pool has called for progress on pooling the assets of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to accelerate. @London_CIV room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 1 week ago

    JOB ALERT: Watford Borough Council & Three Rivers District Council, various roles:       Technical Accountant Career Grade: We are looking for a motivated team player to join our Finance Department. The post holder will gain experience across these… dlvr.it/SSWN8f

    Room151 1 week ago

    Inflation and the LGPS: Local government pension payments will rise significantly next year based on the inflation rate this September. William Bourne discusses whether funds should be looking for some protection by turning to[...] dlvr.it/SSVK9x pic.twitter.com/7zH9OkRo1d

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Economy: Inflation on the rise while the MPC sticks with ‘patient approach’
  • Next story Andrew Hardingham: Holidays await but the ‘in’ box is brimming over

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK