• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Court of Appeal’s Heathrow decision delivers climate warning to councils

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Resources · Technical
  • — 19 Mar, 2020
Photo: Pixabay

A decision over a third runway at the country’s biggest airport means section 151 officers must consider climate issues when they draw up their spending plans. Helen Randall explains why.

Given the current situation where air traffic has reduced due to the Covid-19 pandemic, it is probably surprising that a case concerning the expansion of Heathrow airport could still have such far-reaching implications for all public authorities and their decisions, strategic plans and even, potentially, in relation to planning capital expenditure.

The recent Court of Appeal decision regarding Heathrow airport expansion came about as a result of five different judicial reviews in a rolled-up hearing brought by environmental organisations Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Plan B Earth, WWF-UK, five local authorities and the Mayor for London against a decision by the Secretary of State for Transport.

The background was that if the UK wished to maintain its leading aviation “hub” status, then our aviation capacity must increase.

As the court remarked, whether the increase in capacity should be supported in national policy, and whether it should involve the construction of a third runway at Heathrow, has long been a matter of controversy, intensified by concerns over the environmental cost of achieving it, and by the concerted global effort to combat climate change through cutting carbon emissions. However, the court did not get drawn into this debate.

Keep in touch – register for Room151 treasury and finance meetings ONLINE

The court looked at whether the Airport’s National Policy Statement (ANPS), the government’s policy in favour of a third runway at Heathrow, was lawful.

The commitments

Why is this relevant to section 151 officers? Because in effect, this case indicates that when any public authority is making any major decision, it now needs to pay regard to our international climate change commitments.

This case looked at several aspects of environmental law which, although European law, will still have relevance in terms of the UK’s domestic and international environmental commitments.

The environmental law issues included the Habitats Directive, the SEA Directive concerning the assessment of the environmental effects of plans and programmes, and the UK’s climate change commitments in the Paris Agreement.

One question the court looked at was whether the ANPS was unlawful because the secretary of state failed to have regard to the desirability of mitigating aviation emissions following the UK’s Paris commitments beyond 2050, and to the ability of future generations to meet their needs.

Under the Paris Agreement, the UK government decided not to set new emissions targets because it felt the nation already had stretching targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions which would already contribute positively to global climate action, but the government did indicate a possible future UK target for zero net domestic emissions.

There is also a statutory duty on the United Kingdom to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 100% from their 1990 level by 2050.

The Habitats Directive contributes towards ensuring bio-diversity through the conservation of natural habitats and wild fauna and flora in Europe.

The SEA Directive provides for the integration of environmental considerations into the preparation and adoption of plans and programmes with a view to promoting sustainable development.

Paris

The Court of Appeal held that the UK’s commitment to the Paris Agreement was clearly part of government policy by the time of designation of the ANPS. It also ruled that the executive must comply with the will of Parliament and take account of its own policy commitments.

The court decided that the secretary of state had made an error of law because he never asked himself the question whether he could take into account the Paris Agreement and, if he had asked, the only answer that would reasonably have been open to him is that the Paris Agreement was so obviously material to the decision it was irrational not to take it into account.

So, the lessons that section 151 officers and elected members can take from the Heathrow case is that when setting a council’s capital programme and making major spending or investment decisions, nowadays, in light of the law both domestically and internationally, it will always be relevant to take into account environmental considerations. This includes carbon reduction targets, the environmental impact a decision might have, and whether a decision could be detrimental to biodiversity and foul fall of habitats legislation.

This, in fact, is not unusual in terms of private sector investment nowadays, which is increasingly considering environmental, social and governance issues (ESG).

It should not be surprising that the public sector also has to bear in mind these matters when making spending decisions. Even more so, if your authority has declared a climate change emergency.

What would be the consequence of your authority failing to have regard to environmental matters? Well, according to the Court of Appeal in the Heathrow case, it would suggest that the decisions that the section 151 officer, or your elected members, have made would be unlawful and potentially vulnerable to judicial review.

These days, given the increasing public pressure on climate change, it is more important than ever that decisions are legally sound.

Helen Randall is a partner at law firm Trowers & Hamlins LLP.

Subscribe to our free newsletters

Share

You may also like...

  • Bank of England battles inflation with latest interest rate rise 21st Mar, 2022
  • PWLB changes and local authority creditworthiness 27th Jan, 2021
  • Mandatory Prudential Code ‘no substitute’ for effective balance sheet management 26th Aug, 2021
  • The outlook for equity markets: The Bull and Bear Case 15th Dec, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Funding gaps and how to manage them
  • Next story Interview: Dan Hawthorn, director of housing, Haringey

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares