• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Dealing with the in-year budget challenge: a risk based approach

0
  • by Stephen Fitzgerald
  • in Blogs · Technical
  • — 14 Aug, 2017

Previous articles I have posted on Room 151 have dealt with strategies and behaviours that local authorities can apply in setting their budgets; but this is only part of the challenge.  Setting a budget is one thing but achieving delivery is where the real hard work comes in.

If organisations are to achieve success in their financial management, budget setting needs to be realistic rather than aspiring and there also needs to be a strategy for in-year delivery.

When budgets are set, overspending is a key risk and some public-sector organisations struggle to balance the books in-year.

Trying to keep in-year spend within budget across organisations can be a herculean task and addressing all elements of a budget of £200m or more, may not get the desired result.   To achieve a successful outcome you may consider a risk-based approach that focuses on areas most likely to overspend.

This is not to say that rigour must not be applied to all areas of spend through the standard budget monitoring process but, this may not be in itself sufficient in a tight budgetary situation.

The alternative is to segment the budget savings by levels of risk.  Often there will be specific savings that have been identified when the organisation’s budget is set at the start of the financial year.  Taking these savings opportunities, they can be used as the basis for the undertaking of a series of specific steps.

  1. Risk rate each savings opportunity: Establish a scoring mechanism (usually 1 to 10) then determine the level of risk of non-delivery of each savings item that has been identified in the budget.
  2. Rank by level of risk: Sort the list of savings opportunities by the risk ranking and select the highest risk items for further scrutiny.
  3. Establish a panel to scrutinise the high-risk savings: This can either be at political or official level (or both) but needs to consider the high-risk savings and hold the officers responsible to account for delivering on budget objectives.
  4. Ensure that officers come up with proposals for the delivery of savings: It is important that the panel does not become a talking shop but is genuinely focused on ensuring that the high-risk savings are agreed – or replacements are found to mitigate the impact of non-delivery.
  5. Review progress over a series of stage gates: This process is designed to address the high-risk areas but will only work if there is a structured journey throughout the year and if organisational leadership provides sufficient proactive momentum.

It is important to say that no amount of process can change the difficult situation that some public-sector organisations find themselves.  However, people in local government have already demonstrated how skilled they are in managing with a reducing resource base.

A simple methodology, where an organisation can be focused on the riskiest area of its budgets to limit and manage the impact of in-year spending pressures can be very effective. It is not without complication but as finance professionals we are bound to work within the legal and budgetary framework that sets the parameters that local authorities operate in.  This approach has proved to deliver in times of budgetary constraint. It is a difficult job but ultimately it must be done if financial sustainability is to be achieved!

Stephen Fitzgerald

Stephen Fitzgerald, interim finance director and chair of the ACCA Public Sector Panel.

@SHJFitzgerald

Share

You may also like...

  • ESG in liquidity 13th Jan, 2021
  • New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?” 13th Jan, 2021
  • On the hunt in high yield 24th May, 2021
  • Why infrastructure assets are the ugly ducklings of capital accounting 28th Apr, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 2 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Dawn Reeves: Why the S151’s story is a thriller filler
  • Next story LGPS fee transparency initiative captures third of market

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares