• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Rob Whiteman: Far-reaching reporting changes

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Technical
  • — 18 Dec, 2018

Rob Whiteman reviews the dramatic changes over the past 12 months and looks ahead to the coming year.

Just as the 1960s are retrospectively seen as a period of social change, or the 1930s as a period of upheaval, the present epoch will most likely be seen as a turning point. However, amidst it all at the time we probably can’t recognise it. The loss of public trust? The rise of China? Social media as a weapon of war? Either way, there are bigger forces at play than even Brexit, which is in reality just a consequence of any combination of the above.

In that context, as public finance professionals our enduring role is to provide high quality and transparent information and advice that reports past activity, manages present services and ensures the best and most sustainable decisions for the future.

Our duty each year is to report on a world that never stands still, and, with significant changes to technical reporting standards, 2018 has been no different. Changes through IFRS 9, 15 and 16, which are a consequence of major changes to internal financial reporting standards, will bring further work.

Finance teams in local authorities have had a particularly challenging year, grappling with extremely challenging financial pressures across the organisation whilst making further efficiencies themselves. In truth, austerity creates more work for finance, and in the way central government is strategically putting more staff on the border for Brexit, then during austerity councils would sensibly make the finance teams bigger.

Financial resilience

Local government has faced unprecedented financial challenges in recent years that are likely to persist well into the next decade. Despite the financial strain, councils have been able to deliver core services and manage their balance sheets more actively than other parts of the public sector. But, unfortunately, financial management capabilities and sharing good practice have at times been hollowed out by the repeated need to cut budgets. 

The difficult financial situation that many authorities find themselves in has also not been helped by the relative weakness of public audit systems in place.

It is against this background that CIPFA has taken a leadership role in the public interest and devoted resources to the development of a Financial Resilience Index, which will consolidate the information for CFOs in relation to their council’s adequacy of reserves and any growing proximity to s114 territory. And I acknowledge this is difficult territory for CIPFA. As a membership body we do not wish to act outside of all members’ wishes; but as a chartered qualification body, we are ourselves held to account to ensure our members meet the statutory duties placed on them as a regulated profession.

Loking forward, the new Financial Management Code – to sit alongside established treasury management and  prudential codes – will set out good practice in the planning and execution of sustainable finances. We hope to continue to share practical advice via the Funding Advisory Service (FAS) and that a very good new resource planning tool will help finance teams.

Adoption of IFRS 9: Financial Instruments

The 2018/19 Code introduced a single approach to the classification and measurement of financial instruments. The standard requires authorities to hold financial instruments at fair value, with gains and losses charged to revenue as they arise. For certain categories of investments, authorities will now recognise these gains and losses in their revenue accounts. As a result, the changes in the value of these investments will impact the authority’s General Fund. 

Similarly, the standard introduces a forward-looking ‘expected loss’ model for the impairment of financial assets. This approach is likely to result in an increase in the impairment allowance and will require authorities to recognise impairment losses earlier.

Just as IFRS 9 is substantial and technically complex, so are its potential consequences for local authorities. The standard will be applied by authorities for the first time next year and is expected to have far-reaching financial and practical implications. Specifically, IFRS 9 has been predicted to pose a challenge for authorities which hold complex financial instruments as part of their debt portfolios.

Issues around the accounting for complex financial instruments emerged during this year. During the 2017/18 statement of accounts closedown process, CIPFA was alerted to accounting issues relating to Lender Option Borrower Options (LOBO) loans.

This prompted CIPFA/LASAAC to issue a statement on contracts with LOBO clauses in May of this year. It clarifies that the Code requires that local authorities follow the provisions of IFRS 9 and IAS 39 respectively in relation to the accounting treatment of embedded derivatives in contracts where there are LOBO clauses. 

It remains the case that the accounting for LOBOs will affect a limited number of authorities. In addition, feedback from auditors based on authorities’ 2017/18 financial statements indicates that auditors have been generally satisfied that in the majority of instances these loans did not require treatment as Fair Value through Profit or Loss,which could have had significant implications for the General Fund. However,enhanced disclosures about these loans and their impact on council finances were generally regarded as necessary.

Adoption of IFRS 15: Revenue from Contracts

The 2019/20 Code introduced a five-step model that authorities will apply to all contracts with customers. The standard requires revenue to be recognised in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers or service recipients in an amount that reflects the consideration that the authority expects to be entitled to, in exchange for those goods or services.

The new principles-based approach to revenue recognition clarifies when an authority should recognise revenue and how much should be recognised.

The implications of IFRS 15 on an authority’s current accounting practices will be dependent on the extent of its commercial activity and the type of contracts held. Where an authority has entered into long-term, high-value contracts for the sale of goods or services, consideration will need to be given to understanding the how the new five-step model will apply to these income streams. As a consequence, the authority may see changes in the profile of revenue recognised and cost recognition.

However, given non-exchange transactions do not fall under IFRS 15, authorities’ major income streams will be unaffected and no accounting changes will be required.

IFRS 16: Leases

IFRS 16 introduces a substantial change in accounting practice for local authorities that hold leases. The standard removes the distinction between operating and finance leases in current accounting standards. Under IFRS 16, entities are required to recognise assets and liabilities for all leases with a term of more than 12 months, unless the underlying asset is of low value. The asset represents the holder’s right to use the underlying leased property, and the corresponding liability represents the lessee’s obligation to pay for that right.

Thechanges introduced by IFRS 16 are significant and signal the end of the existing ‘off-balance sheet’ treatment for operating leases. For authorities that hold large numbers of leased assets, the financial impacts may be significant. As a consequence of leased assets now being ‘on-balance sheet’,the standard may also impact on authorities’ budgets and capital finance arrangements, including their prudential indicators. On a more practical level, depending on authorities existing systems, the information required to implemen tthe standard will impact on authorities’ workloads and demand a considerable amount of input and resource from staff across a range of departments. 

Earlier this month, CIPFA/LASAAC confirmed that authorities will be required to implement IFRS 16 in the 2020/21 financial year, together with the rest of the UK Public Sector. In their statement, CIPFA/LASAAC emphasised the substantial preparation time associated with applying the standard. In order to assist authorities, CIPFA will issue a project plan and application guidance during 2019.

And finally…

Like the three wise men, these standards have been on the horizon and followed from afar for some time. Each will bear different gifts come the new year, and CIPFA will endeavour to both expertly guide and support practitioners through working with them.

For the longer term there is a difficulty that will remain hard to manage. UK law is that international standards must be translated through to public services; but clearly we are hitting tensions where because we make use of commercial instruments we are seeking legal overrides to commercial accounting rules as they adversely affect councils. Ultimately, we run the risk of being questioned whether such instruments, and their risks, are suitable for local government if it cannot easily adopt the associated commercial accounting treatments.

Rob Whiteman is chief executive of CIPFA

Get the Room 151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Building back better? 27th Apr, 2021
  • 2021 treasury management survey underway 26th Aug, 2021
  • LGPS funding adequacy: Is 150% the new 100%? 14th Dec, 2021
  • Draft accounts: delays continue despite deadline dash 2nd Aug, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 10 hours ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 13 hours ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 2 days ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 2 days ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 3 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 6 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 1 week ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 1 week ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 1 week ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story 2018 – A year in regulation
  • Next story A New Year’s resolution for partnerships between the public and private sectors

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares