• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’

    August 15, 2022

  • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override

    August 12, 2022

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Is this the end of outsourcing?

0
  • by Richard Harbord
  • in Blogs · Resources · Richard Harbord
  • — 25 Jul, 2018

There won’t be many still working in local government who will remember the beginnings of outsourcing in 1980. It was one of the first moves of the new Thatcher government to break the monopoly of local authorities on the provision of services and modernise the sector. The 1980 legislation only affected construction and building services and so had relatively a small impact generally but the acts of 1988 widened it to all other “blue collar” services and libraries and arts management. In 1996 the requirements were extended to “white collar” services.

It was interesting to see how various authorities reacted, splitting, of course, largely along political lines. There were authorities who went through the whole thing without losing any services at all to the private sector. As it was not strictly a level playing field this did generally require some fairly innovative treatment of overheads.  Other authorities embraced the concept with great enthusiasm; the most usual targets being refuse collection, street cleaning and grounds maintenance.

There was no market before the legislation but multiple tenders emerged promptly, particularly in these areas, and competition was fierce. I remember the District Audit Report on the failure of a refuse collection contract in a London Borough which pointed out that to have been operated in line with the contract would have meant the refuse operatives moving at the qualifying speed for the Olympic marathon whilst shifting 10 tons of refuse each! Another failed street-sweeping contract was claimed to have provided a new opportunity for community spirit amongst residents!

In 1997 a change of government did away with the compulsory element and replaced it with the somewhat nebulous concept of “best value”.

However there has continued to be a considerable private sector involvement in some services. In the authority I live in, my refuse operative tells me he started working for the authority and is now on his fifth private sector employer.

Of course, since 1997 there has not only been the continuation of voluntary contracting-out but also an explosion in shared services and in very large contracts for many services with one supplier.

It was hardly surprising therefore that the local government minister, Rishi Sunak,  said at CIPFA’s recent conference that Carillion’s collapse “shines a spotlight on outsourcing and whether it makes sense.”

Actually the statistics for the last few years show that bringing services back in house has become a regular feature of life. The financial results of the remaining outsourcing firms show that they are clearly under stress and local authorities need to carefully weigh up the risks involved in entering into further contracts. Having said that several authorities with large scale contracts have made significant savings over the last few years.

There does still seems to be an exception in terms of revenues, where there is still an active outsourcing market and several successful shared services. However the future changes to business rates may mean that local authorities would rather have that in house.

Clearly in the current financial climate there can be no one solution for provision of services and each must be carefully considered on its merits. In many authorities pursuing the theme of the competitive council means using arms length companies. These can be very useful in offering a greater competitive market place in which to operate but there are governance issues which need to be carefully considered and dealt with.

There are so many challenges currently. I have recently been involved in considering the extent of local authority involvement in money laundering. For local authorities to “allow” this to take place is a criminal offence and the designated money laundering reporting officer (often the section 151 officer)  can face criminal action and a possible stay in Belmarsh. There is undoubtedly an increase in activity here principally in right to buy and business rates.

All this is the reason why local government finance remains the career of choice!

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • MRP consultation: don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater 8th Feb, 2022
  • Three regulatory risk challenges for treasury managers 31st Jan, 2022
  • Making sense of climate risk reporting for LGPS 2nd Mar, 2021
  • How to be net zero by 2030 23rd Feb, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’
    • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override
    • EAPF criticised for water company investments
    • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy
    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 days ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 4 days ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 5 days ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 6 days ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 6 days ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 1 week ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Housing and regeneration summit to explore collaborative finance and funding models
  • Next story Time limited statutory override offers ‘postponement’ to impact of IFRS9

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares