• Home
  • About
  • 151 IMPACT AWARDS
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

Impact Awards –>
  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Peter Worth: Do we need a statutory override for IFRS 9?

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Technical
  • — 16 Apr, 2018

IFRS9CIPFA is reportedly working on a statutary override for the controvesial accounting standard IFRS9. Peter Worth argues there are plenty of reasons why this is unnecesssary.

Introduced on 1 April, IFRS 9 now covers all equity investments. These include counterparty loans, cash deposits, purchased share capital and pooled investment vehicles, though not directly held property or shareholdings subject to group accounts.

The new standard requires equity investments to be classed as either “fair value through profit and loss” (FVTPL) or “fair value through other vomprehensive income” (FVOCI).

Both are valued in the same way under IFRS13 but classification determines whether unrealised losses or gains are taken straight to revenue or held in reserves until the asset is disposed of:

*Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Account

According to “Public Finance”, CIPFA is working with central government on a statutory override to ensure that any unrealised losses on FVTPL investments will not affect the taxpayer.

One of the arguments supporting the override is that some investments initially decline in value before they recover, the so-called J-curve effect. This often reflects front-loading of fees and transaction costs particularly relevant to some types of collective investment vehicle.

Many practitioners consequently expect the override to be restricted to these investment options only, but I do not consider it right that either legislation or accountancy should favour one type of instrument over another in a way that might influence treasury management decisions.

Moreover, IFRS13 specifically states that fund managers’ fees and transaction costs should be expensed and not deducted from the value of investments.

Proper application of existing requirements would thus avoid the need for any impairment or reserve accounting.

No override required

There are another four reasons why I believe an override for IFRS9 is not required.

1. IFRS9 already permits reserve accounting
IFRS9 allows equity investments to be classified as FVOCI where the investment exists for purposes other than simply to generate financial gains.

Even without an override, many local authority investments can therefore be classified in a way that permits reserve accounting.

2. Transparency and accountability
New Statutory Guidance published in February 2018 requires greater transparency on local government investment returns and the extent to which core services depend on investment income. One way of achieving this is to align service expenditure with the relevant investment transactions in financial statements.

A statutory override reversing these transactions will only lead to less transparency and could camouflage poor decision making.

3. Consistency with LGPS accounting
Local Government Pension Scheme accounts have always reflected the full change in market value of investments in the Funds Account each year, and since 2014/15 they have been encouraged to treat all fees and transaction costs as expenses.

This practice will continue under IFRS9 and to maintain different accounting treatments for their administering authorities seems both illogical and unnecessary.

4. Track record on investment returns
Although I understand the desire to protect reserves and council tax levels, I also believe that local authorities usually make good investment choices.

Recent track records on pension investment portfolios are impressive, with a 25% increase in fund values over the past three years, and most local authorities have recently demonstrated, as part of the MIFID II “opting up” process, that they have sound arrangements in place to understand and manage investment risk.

Consequently, I remain unconvinced of the need for a statutory override in this instance. Also, setting technicalities aside, local authorities struggling to balance budgets in the eighth consecutive year of austerity might find the option to access investment gains earlier than expected extremely useful.

Peter Worth

Peter Worth is a director at Worth Technical Accounting Solutions.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • The politics of timing – Glasgow and its city deal The politics of timing – Glasgow and its city deal 10 Mar, 2016
  • ECB reliant on ‘confidence’ ECB reliant on ‘confidence’ 19 Dec, 2011
  • Peter Worth: Happy New Year  – IFRS 9 is coming Peter Worth: Happy New Year – IFRS 9 is coming 2 Jan, 2018
  • Dan Bates: The importance of council tax in the fair funding debate Dan Bates: The importance of council tax in the fair funding debate 5 Apr, 2018

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 19 hours ago

    Impact Awards: Liverpool’s cafe culture and Warrington’s investment in homes: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards showcase  finance teams with a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight Liverpool City Council’s… dlvr.it/RxJsKb pic.twitter.com/dEYpaz6HP0

    Room151 22 hours ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for housing or regeneration? Check out the 'Place Shaping' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @31tenConsulting in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !! pic.twitter.com/dU99vE6Wws

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for Adult Social Care & Health? Check out the ASC&H category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by Fundamentum Social Housing REIT in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for the environment? Check out the 'carbon management' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @ACSLLP in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 2 days ago

    So what are the seven categories for the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards? Here they are room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… #localgov #finance #outcomes

    Room151 2 days ago

    Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation?: The impact of the coronavirus pandemic, lockdown and wider economic uncertainty created  deflationary pressures which raise important considerations for the Local Government Pension Scheme writes… dlvr.it/RxF7Fs pic.twitter.com/JlcjROBIpz

    Room151 3 days ago

    JOB ALERT: LPFA Finance Director vacancy: London Pensions Fund Authority Finance Director and s151 Officer Competitive salary and benefits The largest Local Government Pension (LGPS) provider in London with around £6.5 billion of assets and 135[...] dlvr.it/RxBdJP

    Room151 3 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Further signs that local government finance is failing: The crisis in Liverpool and a fix for education budgets are further indication that local government finance is in need of a root and branch review. Even for those students[...] dlvr.it/Rx9PSV pic.twitter.com/sAanC2gEyu

    Room151 1 week ago

    Impact Awards: Finance helps launch school meals company and support business during lockdown: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards will showcase the way finance teams have a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight… dlvr.it/RwnlF4 pic.twitter.com/AJhne1MVG4

    Room151 1 week ago

    "This work has made a vital, practical contribution to ensuring people have been supported through the pandemic." #impact #151awards #covid #s151 room151.co.uk/treasury/impac… #impactcasestudies #councilfinancemakesadifference

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ #passiton #localgov #s151 #151awards pic.twitter.com/A0uO0dwBkM

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Financial pressures loom for 2023 and beyond: Kate Ogden writes the government has addressed most of the short-term Covid-19 financial pressures facing English councils, but problems loom in 2022-23 and the years following. As we enter the[...] dlvr.it/RwfDsz pic.twitter.com/hpv2R09w75

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Calling all #localgov finance officers and #s151s room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ It's the #151Awards Thanks to the @LGALocalism for helping us get the word out along with all the LA treasury societies. pic.twitter.com/Nkal9BrH1J

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Five London LGPS funds go it alone to invest in private debt
  • Next story Colin Pratt: The evolution of investment management in the LGPS

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.