• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Pool cue: New guidance set to change LGPS landscape

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · LGPS
  • — 4 Feb, 2019

Draft statutory guidance for pooling within the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) could see funds testing the limits of their responsibilities in the courts, says Nick Vickers

Whilst it may not have been particularly welcome to LGPS administering authorities, the government’s push for LGPS pooling looks as if it has made substantial progress in much of England and Wales.

Thinking back to Fawlty Towers and “not mentioning the war”I am going to be very polite and not make any reference to those pools where not a great deal seems to have happened, or the areas where encouraging participation appears akin to herding cats.

My first involvement with pooling was at a meeting of the Local Government Association in August 2015 and my personal view was wholly antipathetic.

Why did the Kent Fund need this? What possible purpose could it serve? What was it going to add?

A Date for Your Diary
Room151’s LGPS Asset Allocation Forum
November 7th, 2019, The London Stock Exchange
Register your interest…

I also thought that – remarkably after all these years of the LGPS flying under the radar – the Treasury and the then DCLG had actually realised that local authorities across the country were actually investing huge amounts of pension fund money on a global basis and they couldn’t possibly be doing it properly so they needed to intervene.

And I’ve double checked. It was three secretary of states ago, and of course before George Osborne moved in to journalism. A very different time.

For Kent, the journey, starting with the excellent collaborative work which Hymans Robertson kicked off in 2015, meant a pretty easy move in to working with nine other county councils plus the Isle of Wight unitary, and the watch words were “like minded”.

That has worked out to be the case.

The collaboration between the 11 Councils in the ACCESS pool has worked remarkably well and the procurement of Link as our operator is an excellent proof of concept.

Billions of pounds are moving in to the new structure and we also undertook a highly successful passive manager appointment with very significant savings being made.

All of which could have been achieved through collaborative procurement, an approach that the DCLG didn’t accept as going far enough.

So, against that backdrop, the LGPS Statutory Guidance on Asset Pooling published on 3 January does seem to be a curious move by MHCLG which one would imagine is pretty satisfied overall on the progress made by the eight pools.

And as ever with these things, once the stone is dropped the ripples will be interesting.

So, for example how does the “statutory guidance” sit alongside the statutory responsibilities of administering authorities to manage their funds in the manner they see fit?

That is a pretty fundamental question which I would have thought some administering authorities may wish to test with the legal profession and even ultimately in the courts.

So, let’s take an example where an individual fund has a highly successful mainstream equity mandate with an excellent investment performance and an acceptable fee structure.

If the pool company doesn’t for some reason want to bring that manager on to their platform, or the manager doesn’t want to go on it, does that fund have to sack the manager or can they retain them outside of the pool?

The 2016 guidance would have allowed this – 7(2)(d) to be precise including a value for money hurdle – but that has all gone now.

In fact the consultation document specifically states that 7(2)(d) is replaced with new wording:

“…all administering authorities must pool their assets”

And:

“in order to maximize the benefits of scale, pool members must appoint a pool company or companies to implement their investment strategies”.

And I guess someone in the Treasury still wants to push passive management so we have:

“pool members….should regularly review the balance between active and passive management….They should consider moving from active to passive management where active management has not generated better net performance”.

Well at least the administering authority still has responsibility for asset allocation and investment strategy.

Or does it in light of:

“providing pool members with asset allocation choices through an excessively wide range of pool vehicles or investment managers will restrict the pool company’s ability to use scale to drive up value”?

I assume “drive up value” means go cheap?

And finally, so that we are all clear on the direction of travel: “from 2020 when new investment strategies are in place, pool members should make new investments outside the pool only in very limited circumstances”.

I think MHCLG should look forward to some very interesting responses from administering authorities.

Nick Vickers is the business partner (Pension Fund) at Kent County Council and chief financial officer at Swale Borough Council. The views expressed are his own and not the views of either council.

Share

You may also like...

  • LGPS annual report: Little drama but investment costs at £1.29bn 21st Jul, 2021
  • Going beyond the standard metrics for climate change 2nd Mar, 2021
  • Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation? 8th Apr, 2021
  • Local government: from funding famine to balanced diet 4th Apr, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Treasury committee to consider reforming business rates
  • Next story Councils lodge LOBO ‘fraud’ claims with High Court

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares