• Home
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Conference
  • TMS Links
  • Calendar
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Legal & General invests £100m in Sunderland regeneration project

    November 28, 2019

  • Somerset council invests in Devon industrial site

    November 28, 2019

  • Appeal Court backs Birmingham’s £19m sprinkler spending

    November 28, 2019

  • Border to Coast launches private credit offering

    November 28, 2019

  • Darlington estimates 17% annual return on proposed housing company

    November 28, 2019

  • Knowsley buys town centre land to kickstart regeneration

    November 28, 2019

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Jobs

Pool cue: New guidance set to change LGPS landscape

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · LGPSi
  • — 4 Feb, 2019
  • Image by Rowen Atkinson, Flickr

Draft statutory guidance for pooling within the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) could see funds testing the limits of their responsibilities in the courts, says Nick Vickers

Whilst it may not have been particularly welcome to LGPS administering authorities, the government’s push for LGPS pooling looks as if it has made substantial progress in much of England and Wales.

Thinking back to Fawlty Towers and “not mentioning the war”I am going to be very polite and not make any reference to those pools where not a great deal seems to have happened, or the areas where encouraging participation appears akin to herding cats.

My first involvement with pooling was at a meeting of the Local Government Association in August 2015 and my personal view was wholly antipathetic.

Why did the Kent Fund need this? What possible purpose could it serve? What was it going to add?

A Date for Your Diary
Room151’s LGPS Asset Allocation Forum
November 7th, 2019, The London Stock Exchange
Register your interest…

I also thought that – remarkably after all these years of the LGPS flying under the radar – the Treasury and the then DCLG had actually realised that local authorities across the country were actually investing huge amounts of pension fund money on a global basis and they couldn’t possibly be doing it properly so they needed to intervene.

And I’ve double checked. It was three secretary of states ago, and of course before George Osborne moved in to journalism. A very different time.

For Kent, the journey, starting with the excellent collaborative work which Hymans Robertson kicked off in 2015, meant a pretty easy move in to working with nine other county councils plus the Isle of Wight unitary, and the watch words were “like minded”.

That has worked out to be the case.

The collaboration between the 11 Councils in the ACCESS pool has worked remarkably well and the procurement of Link as our operator is an excellent proof of concept.

Billions of pounds are moving in to the new structure and we also undertook a highly successful passive manager appointment with very significant savings being made.

All of which could have been achieved through collaborative procurement, an approach that the DCLG didn’t accept as going far enough.

So, against that backdrop, the LGPS Statutory Guidance on Asset Pooling published on 3 January does seem to be a curious move by MHCLG which one would imagine is pretty satisfied overall on the progress made by the eight pools.

And as ever with these things, once the stone is dropped the ripples will be interesting.

So, for example how does the “statutory guidance” sit alongside the statutory responsibilities of administering authorities to manage their funds in the manner they see fit?

That is a pretty fundamental question which I would have thought some administering authorities may wish to test with the legal profession and even ultimately in the courts.

So, let’s take an example where an individual fund has a highly successful mainstream equity mandate with an excellent investment performance and an acceptable fee structure.

If the pool company doesn’t for some reason want to bring that manager on to their platform, or the manager doesn’t want to go on it, does that fund have to sack the manager or can they retain them outside of the pool?

The 2016 guidance would have allowed this – 7(2)(d) to be precise including a value for money hurdle – but that has all gone now.

In fact the consultation document specifically states that 7(2)(d) is replaced with new wording:

“…all administering authorities must pool their assets”

And:

“in order to maximize the benefits of scale, pool members must appoint a pool company or companies to implement their investment strategies”.

And I guess someone in the Treasury still wants to push passive management so we have:

“pool members….should regularly review the balance between active and passive management….They should consider moving from active to passive management where active management has not generated better net performance”.

Well at least the administering authority still has responsibility for asset allocation and investment strategy.

Or does it in light of:

“providing pool members with asset allocation choices through an excessively wide range of pool vehicles or investment managers will restrict the pool company’s ability to use scale to drive up value”?

I assume “drive up value” means go cheap?

And finally, so that we are all clear on the direction of travel: “from 2020 when new investment strategies are in place, pool members should make new investments outside the pool only in very limited circumstances”.

I think MHCLG should look forward to some very interesting responses from administering authorities.

Nick Vickers is the business partner (Pension Fund) at Kent County Council and chief financial officer at Swale Borough Council. The views expressed are his own and not the views of either council.

Share

You may also like...

  • Bob Swarup: The corrosive impact of inflation  21 Jun, 2017
  • Richard Harbord Richard Harbord: Goodbye 2016, and a not so warm welcome to 2017 4 Jan, 2017
  • Westminster COO on tri-borough initiatives, housing finance and derivatives 14 Mar, 2012
  • How the Right to Buy undermines estate regeneration 21 May, 2013

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room 151 59 mins ago

    Doug McMurdo: LGPS, the Stewardship Code, good governance and protecting capital: I have spent the last decade leading Bedfordshire Pension Fund (BPF) as chairman of the pensions committee. We are facing many challenges, not least the reforms that the… dlvr.it/RKfJrD

    Room 151 59 mins ago

    Active managers still in the game: Under performance and high costs have given active management a bad press, some of it well deserved. But it appears to be on the brink of a renaissance with some[...] dlvr.it/RKfJjR pic.twitter.com/yyAcm1wSMy

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Court ruling leaves councils facing compensation bills for water overcharging: Councils could face compensation costs running into the millions after the High Court ruled that a council unlawfully overcharged its tenants for supplying water from 2002,… dlvr.it/RKZnQK pic.twitter.com/tawdmA9wlE

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Election 2019: “Stark” differences in parties’ proposals for council funding: Conservative Party manifesto proposals would not meet rising costs faced by councils, while Labour Party policies would meet demand even with a council tax freeze, according to… dlvr.it/RKZnNT pic.twitter.com/F16kSfQrXI

    Room 151 2 days ago

    LGPS women discuss: climate & pension fund investing: Climate change has become one of the biggest issues for asset owners and managers as they move to tackle global warming. Room151 convened a roundtable of LGPS practitioners and advisers[...] dlvr.it/RKXsWW pic.twitter.com/3rtUTapwkF

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Interview: Doug Heron, CEO, Lothian Pension Fund: Doug Heron is heading towards marking one year at Lothian after making the switch from the world of fintech platforms to local government pensions. He talks to Room151 about core[...] dlvr.it/RKSQPK pic.twitter.com/ltHR6AS5gD

    Room 151 6 days ago

    LGPS and the climate change revolution: The pressure to integrate climate change thinking into LGPS asset management is growing. At the Room 151 LGPS Asset Allocation Forum, experts insisted climate be seen as a strategic issue[...] dlvr.it/RKK1cY pic.twitter.com/G87J33R4yS

    Room 151 6 days ago

    Conference chairs, ‘tree-hugging’ and overcharging pension investors: I have a story about two LGPS conferences, two conference chairs and an industry that appears to be changing for the better. I know, sounds like a real doozy, but[...] dlvr.it/RKK1Xy pic.twitter.com/6zYQFuuwAr

    Room 151 6 days ago

    Council feels financial squeeze on housing company pledge: The London Borough of Newham is set to approve a £113.1m funding package to support the latest phase of homes being developed by its wholly-owned housing company- but has admitted[...] dlvr.it/RKHwWy pic.twitter.com/jFrVeCWSw6

    Room 151 7 days ago

    Lack of benefits prompts shared services rethink: A major local authority shared services venture involving Northamptonshire County Council is to be restructured after it was revealed that a number of service areas were only included to boost[...] dlvr.it/RKDypl pic.twitter.com/f0R37mvCtP

    Room 151 7 days ago

    Council report casts doubt on emergence of competitive PWLB alternatives: A report by London Borough of Haringey finance officers has sounded the alarm over the options for councils to find cheaper lenders than the Public Works Loans Board (PWLB)… dlvr.it/RKDJxX pic.twitter.com/dRium0oigT

    Room 151 1 week ago

    How do the main party manifestos affect local government finance?: As the battle for Number 10 hots up, Room151 takes a look at the manifesto commitments likely to be of most interest to section 151 officers. Conservative Party Business rates[...] dlvr.it/RK7wr0 pic.twitter.com/qSNyBwrDrj

    Room 151 2 weeks ago

    Council service spending grows by 1.9%: English local authorities’ total service expenditure reached £91.4bn in 2018-19, a 1.9% increase on the previous year and its highest level since 2014-15. The figures were included in the Local[...] dlvr.it/RJmCCt

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Treasury committee to consider reforming business rates
  • Next story Councils lodge LOBO ‘fraud’ claims with High Court

© Copyright 2019 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK