• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Stephen Sheen: The auditor’s dreaded knock on the door

0
  • by Stephen Sheen
  • in Blogs · Stephen Sheen · Technical
  • — 14 Mar, 2017

Image: Pixabay

Auditors might appear to be upping their action against struggling local authorities, but Stephen Sheen argues there’s little incentive to do anything beyond writing to suggest a council puts its financial house in order.

Local authorities have worked industriously to set balanced budgets for 2017/18 but, after reading about recent auditor interventions, may be dreading a knock on the door from the auditors. But, is a knock likely to come and, if so, how hard could it be?

The most noted historical intervention in the budget-setting process, regarding the Great Rate-Capping Rebellion of 1985, made use of powers that are no longer available to the auditor — surcharging persons for losses incurred or deficiencies caused by wilful misconduct. In those cases, members from Liverpool and Lambeth were issued with certificates to pay the deemed loss of interest on income that arose through their failure to set a rate for the year.

The two options for auditors to head for the courts are now restricted to actions against an authority rather than its individual members or officers:

  • Application to the courts for declaration that an item of account is unlawful (section 28 of the Local Audit and Accountability Act 2014)
  • Application for judicial review of a decision of an authority or of a failure to act which it is reasonable to believe would have an effect on the accounts (section 31 of the 2014 Act)

These are both last resorts and would almost certainly only be taken after auditors had exhausted other options.  We therefore don’t need to discuss them any further in this article.

Powers

Working through the list of powers in reverse order of severity, next is the public interest report (PIR).  Schedule 7 of the 2014 Act gives auditors a duty to consider whether it would be in the public interest to make a report on any matter coming to their notice during an audit.

The power basically gives the auditors the ability to tell the world what an authority has been up to (or, alternatively, what you have not been up to).  Receipt of a PIR brings a requirement for the authority to meet within the month to consider its contents and to give it publicity.  Otherwise an authority has the discretion to react as it (reasonably) chooses to the report, which could include putting on a brave face until the blushes fade.

As the scope for a PIRs is so wide, covering anything interesting that comes to the auditor’s attention, you would imagine that they would be as regular and elevating as Nigel Farage’s rides in the Trump Tower  lift.  But in fact, according to Public Sector Audit Appointments’ website, there have only been four PIRs in the last two years.  Perhaps local government audit really is as dull as you always imagined.

The reality is that it is very easy to avoid issuing a PIR, especially in relation to the adequacy of budgets.  The NAO’s guidance on auditor reporting discourages a report where the public is already adequately aware of the issue, or where confidence in the authority would be unnecessarily undermined.  In most cases, public interest will have waned and considerable costs incurred by the time a report could be compiled.

Unlawful expenditure

Far more effective would be an advisory notice (section 29 of the 2014 Act).  These provide the most direct intervention available to an auditor.  They can be issued where the auditor considers that the authority has taken or is about to take a decision that involves incurring unlawful expenditure or is beginning a course of action that could be unlawful and likely to cause a loss or deficiency.

An advisory notice specifies a period of notice up to 21 days that an authority must give the auditor before it makes or implements a decision or takes a course of action covered by the notice.  After the notice has been given and the period expired, the authority can only proceed if it has met to consider the consequences of intentions, as informed by a statement of reasons provided by the auditor.

The effect of an advisory notice is therefore to bring the business of an authority to a halt and give the auditor time to consider their position whilst the authority reacts to the auditor’s advice.  It doesn’t stop a course of action, but could buy time for an auditor to prepare an application to the courts.

The issue of an advisory notice is at the discretion of the auditor.  They are not required to act once a particular set of circumstances arises.  But if they do, then there could be a substantial impact on the effective running of an authority, especially if the issue relates to something fundamental like the setting of the budget.  Which probably explains why (as far as I am aware) no notices have ever been issued since the power was introduced in 2000.

Beef

Finally, the gentlest of interventions – the written recommendation.  This power was given to auditors to add a bit of beef to anything that they might wish to recommend to an authority.  Under Schedule 7 of the 2014 Act, auditors are able to tag recommendations to be considered by full council, rather than be tucked away in a report that might never come to the attention of members.

This might only be a particular imposition if there is no meeting of full council scheduled in the month following the issue of the recommendation, as a special meeting will then need to be convened to consider it.  Once the meeting takes place, members have the ability to turn down the recommendation if they can do so with good reason.

The sting in the tail of the written recommendation is that they have to be copied to the secretary of state.  However, this seems to have been taken as an indication that only recommendations that are worthy of reference to the Secretary of State should be made.  And, as a reference has the potential to fan the flames of any controversy, written recommendations are rarely made.

In summary, there are actually no circumstances in relation to budget-setting and monitoring where the auditor’s duties and powers coincide to require them to take action.  Where they do act, this will be an individual decision to use a discretion in relation to particular local circumstances, removing any predictability.  But if they intervene, there is little incentive for the auditor to do anything beyond suggesting in a written recommendation that the authority sorts out its own problems.

Stephen Sheen is the managing director of Ichabod’s Industries, a consultancy providing technical accounting support to local government.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Richard Harbord Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point 11 Jan, 2021
  • Stephen Sheen: Prudential Framework and the budgetary implications of MRP guidance Stephen Sheen: Prudential Framework and the budgetary implications of MRP guidance 4 Dec, 2017
  • The week ahead The week ahead 25 Jun, 2012
  • Country data, trade and deflation Country data, trade and deflation 30 Jul, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 58 mins ago

    The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk: Sponsored article: Lauren Sewell examines the prospects for long-term borrowing as Brexit settles and vaccines are deployed against Covid-19. On the 9th October 2019 Whitehall sent… dlvr.it/RqZXCr pic.twitter.com/PzgOZOGQ0k

    Room151 58 mins ago

    ESG in liquidity: Sponsored article: Gavin Haywood looks at the integration of ESG in Federated Hermes’ money market funds. Federated Hermes has over 300 public sector clients invested in our AAA rated money[...] dlvr.it/RqZX5f pic.twitter.com/E87sBXsay8

    Room151 1 day ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 1 day ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 1 day ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 2 days ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 2 days ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 2 days ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 3 days ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 3 days ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 3 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 4 weeks ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

    Room151 4 weeks ago

    Room151’s top stories from a momentous year: 2020 was the year in which local government grappled with Covid-19, funding strains, controversy over borrowing rules and the threat of financial collapse. It has been an exhausting and historic[...] dlvr.it/RnlpZg pic.twitter.com/g3myNyox6J

    Room151 4 weeks ago

    Tracy Bingham: 2020, a year best forgotten but also one of learning: Many will rush to erase 2020 from their memories but, writes Tracy Bingham, there were also many lessons about finance teams, strategic planning and leadership. 2020: A year we’d… dlvr.it/RnlpY2 pic.twitter.com/m7G1krrtCu

    Room151 4 weeks ago

    Settlement must address ‘precarious’ local government finances: Dan Bates crosses his fingers for “no nasty surprises” in this week’s funding settlement but argues the “bigger prize” is post-Covid financial certainty. Thursday (17 December) should be the… dlvr.it/Rnj9dG pic.twitter.com/KLKjjuBqJE

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB consultation: Big change on the way but there are ‘grey areas’ and opportunities: The consultation on PWLB borrowing has concluded creating a new landscape for funding property acquisition. Our experts look at the implications. Tracie Langley The… dlvr.it/RndRvJ pic.twitter.com/KEqXEBmEfq

    Room151 1 month ago

    2021: Better income outcomes?: Sponsored article: Investors should be mindful of structural challenges posed to income generation as a result of rapid thematic change. Jon Bell looks at the prospects for the coming year.[...] dlvr.it/RndRsw pic.twitter.com/TxVk8aXkMq

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story News round-up: Infrastructure model trial, highest council tax rises, Capita treasury services sale
  • Next story Business rates relief secure after NICs u-turn

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK