• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Steve Simkins: Academy conversions and the LGPS

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · LGPS
  • — 28 Oct, 2018

Photo (cropped): weisanjiang/Pixabay, CC0

Steve Simkins outlines some of the complex challenges that the conversion of schools to academies are posing to administering authorities of the LGPS.

The finer details of the way that Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) funds in England process academy conversions are gradually coming to light. In addition to the headache this causes for academies themselves, this might create some unexpected future challenges for the administering authorities and the local authorities whose schools have embarked on this journey

For a few years the focus was on recovery periods and if, with no formal guarantee for academies from the Department for Education (DfE), they should be shortened to as little as seven years. Then a commitment of sorts was made by DfE and most LGPS Funds reverted to longer recovery periods in line with local authorities.

But discussions around whether cash contributions should be paid sooner rather than later can mask an underlying issue. Yes, once academies have converted and their conversion deal is done, their ongoing LGPS obligations need to be managed in the normal way. But the most important issue is what happens at conversion and this can easily slip through the net.

At the point of conversion a decision is made by the LGPS fund concerned, about the amount of assets to be allocated to the academy. This is a final decision and every pound allocated on conversion is a pound that the academy will not have to pay to the fund. On the other hand, a decision by the actuaries after conversion about how contributions need to be paid only determine whether a pound should be paid now or later – it is not a value decision.

So what happens at conversion? To put it mildly, it’s not entirely clear. Until recently, studies into academies and their LGPS participation have shied away from looking at it. However, a recent report from the Government Actuary’s Department is heading in the right direction and has identified some of the issues.

To be fair, it’s complicated. Firstly, a decision needs to be made in principle around whether a fully-funded transfer of assets should be made (this would mean that the transferring active members’ liabilities are fully covered on day one). Secondly, actuarial assumptions need to be determined which, especially if deficits are to be passed from local authority to the new academy, make a very significant difference to the outcome.

This is just the tip of the iceberg.  LGPS actuaries tend to review their approach to actuarial assumptions from valuation to valuation. So how do they set their assumptions in between valuations and what about the academies who convert the day before and the day after a change in approach?  Also, what data do they use (if any) to allocate an appropriate deficit in respect of former employees of the school?

Different funds are making different decisions and using different assumptions. As an experienced actuary, having spent some considerable time getting to the bottom of this, I only just understand it. So an academy with limited funds on conversion has very little opportunity to consider this before it is too late.

With very few exceptions LGPS funds allocate a share of the ceding local authority’s deficit to the academy, normally in respect of all former school employees. However, it is interesting to note that in nearly all other situations that I know of, when a transfer is made from a local authority to a new employer (such as a housing association or NHS Trust) a fully-funded transfer is made. And to add to the mix, with recent strong asset returns, a number of local authorities are keeping hold of surplus assets, which appears to be a one-way bet in their favour.

It doesn’t need to be this complicated and it doesn’t need to be this opaque.  There is an LGPS regulation that requires a transfer from one fund to another to be agreed between the two actuaries, which is right and in line with how bulk transfers are dealt with across the pensions industry. On the other hand, allocations from one employer to another within a fund do not require the same careful scrutiny. If an agreement between two actuaries had been a requirement from the start, we may now be in a different place.

Finding a solution is going to be hard. Any move to get things right for future conversions may highlight the inherent issues in the many thousands of conversions that have taken place to date. But unless this is looked at openly and with transparency, these issues will continue to be stored up for the future.

Steve Simkins is the head of public sector pensions at KPMG UK.

Get the LGPS Quarterly Briefing

Share

You may also like...

  • Local authority accounts: embrace the complexity 28th Mar, 2022
  • Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and short duration 25th Feb, 2021
  • ‘Demand outpacing supply’ on green LGPS investments 24th Feb, 2022
  • How to be net zero by 2030 23rd Feb, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story LGPS Q&A: Rachel Elwell on engagement, private markets and hiring a new CIO
  • Next story Terry Crossley: Is LGPS pooling sustainable?

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares