• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Steve Winterflood: The changing nature of local government authority

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Resources
  • — 28 Aug, 2018

Surrey CC council chamber. Photo: Surrey CC, Flickr.

The assumption among most commentators is that authority has been gradually moved from Town Halls to central government. Steve Winterflood’s research suggests that has not always been the case.

The apparent continuing loss of financial authority for English councils over recent years has led us, almost inevitably, to conclude that it is just part of a long-term trend.

It was ever thus. Every year local financial arrangements appear to become more and more centralised. However, by looking into the ingredients that make up financial authority for every year between 1945 and 2015, it is apparent that such a conclusion is far from the truth.

As part of my research, I have identified five measures which have enabled me to plot the ebb and flow of local financial authority over 70 years. The five measures are:

  • The ability to set the base of local taxes and to levy new taxes.
  • The ability to set the rate of local taxes.
  • The level of control over local revenue and capital spend.
  • The level of ring-fencing of government grants.
  • The freedom to borrow.

Each measure is then ascribed a score; these are then combined to produce a Local Financial Authority Index (LFAI). The scores have been calculated with reference to changes in legislation, government financial statistics and an extensive literature review.


Housing & Regeneration Finance Summit 
October 31, 2018, London Stock Exchange CFOs/Treasurers/Investors/CEOs
Local Government – Housing Associations – Institutional Investors – Developers


Rising authority

Remarkably, local financial authority actually increased between 1945 and 1980. So, for exactly half my study period, central government increased local councils’ financial authority.

Decentralisation, at least in financial terms, was at one time a reality. However, throughout the 1980’s local financial authority decreased to the levels previously experienced in the mid 1950’s due to a combination of increased central government control over the rate of local taxes, increased ring-fencing of government grants and greater central control over local expenditure.

The biggest single loss of financial authority occurred in 2000, primarily due to the Local Government Act 1999, which brought about universal capping.

Worse was yet to come. The nadir (hopefully) of local financial authority occurred in 2006 due mostly to increased levels of ring-fencing, particularly as a result of the introduction of the Dedicated Schools Grant.

And it is not a matter of party politics. The biggest financial centralisers were Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair, with the latter being slightly ahead.

National interest

The reasons for the enthusiasm of these particular governments for reducing the level of local financial authority differ in some major respects. But there is a common thread in that both Conservative and Labour governments, between 1979 and 2007, felt it was in the national interest to reduce the level of financial authority exercised by locally elected councils, and that councils were no more sovereign organisations than businesses or community groups.

This was a very different view to what was proffered by governments prior to 1979 in that the democratic legitimacy of local government was at least recognised, although not always respected.

For Thatcher’s governments, the necessity to centralise was complicated. The imperative to reign in the enthusiasm of a number of leftwing councils for implementing their own political agenda rather than simply acting as agents of central government, was, of course, significant. As was the view that the local government monopoly needed to breathe in the fresh air of private sector competition.

But such explanations do not really help to explain the specific diminution of local financial autonomy.

Perhaps the reasons lie more with the government’s oft-stated concern to protect local rate payers, thus protecting themselves from a political backlash from their supporters; and for macro-economic reasons, in that local government expenditure was included at the Treasury’s insistence as part of general government expenditure.

It is clear by reference to the House of Lords select committee on relations between central and local government (1996) that the arguments for such an approach are less than convincing. Indeed, the committee notes, that this is a “Humpty-Dumpty argument”.

However, belief in such an approach gives powerful support, on grounds of macro-economic policy, for central government to control all local government expenditure in the national economic interest.

The Blair government’s bypassing of local government led inevitably to reductions in local government financial authority, most notably over the control of local expenditure and the increased level of ring-fencing of government grants.

Local priorities became secondary to the imperative of eradicating the “postcode lottery” and promoting local choice, and involvement, beyond the confines of local democracy.

And the local heroes? Surprisingly perhaps, the most decentralising government in terms of finance was led by John Major.

The measures I have constructed in compiling the LFAI are only at the draft stage as they need a lot of checking and they still need to be weighted following my interviews with leading chief executives, leaders and other experts on local government.

Steve Winterflood

Steve Winterflood is a PhD student at INLOGOV researching measures of local government authority and is a former chief executive of South Staffordshire Council.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • The opportunity in the renewables and grid support market as UK looks to ‘build back better’ 3rd Mar, 2021
  • Local government: from funding famine to balanced diet 4th Apr, 2022
  • Room151 Roundtable: LGPS Valuations and Risk 2022 2nd Dec, 2021
  • Will new public procurement rules offer the best commercial results? 19th Jan, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 11 hours ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 14 hours ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 2 days ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 2 days ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 3 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 6 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 1 week ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 1 week ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 1 week ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Councils deliver £1bn underspend despite ‘volatility of children’s services’
  • Next story SLT romps to victory in charity cup

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares