• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Thinking cap – What does the scrapping of the HRA cap mean for finance directors?

0
  • by Jonathan Bunt
  • in Blogs · Development · Resources
  • — 8 Oct, 2018

Birmingham, Balaam Wood

Following the government’s scrapping of the housing revenue account cap, council finance directors will face a dilemma about how to balance new homes between the HRA and their housing companies, says Jonathan Bunt.

Twelve months ago, in this blog, after her speech at the 2017 Conservative conference, I described Theresa May’s housing policy as ‘positive and underwhelming’.

Those were almost exactly my thoughts in the wake of the publication of the social housing green paper in August.

On each occasion, the glaring omission for a government which claimed to be serious about fixing the broken housing market was the maintenance of the housing revenue account (HRA) debt cap on local authorities.

It has long been illogical that councils effectively have no limit on borrowing to buy commercial properties, often out of their borough, but, due to the HRA cap, could not do so to invest in much lower risk social housing locally.

Well, now it’s going and the prime minister’s announcement has, correctly, been hugely welcomed by the sector.

There is unsurprisingly, and again correctly, a degree of caution on wanting to see the detail behind the lifting of the cap as well as the timing of it.

The indications on timing suggest that the lifting of the cap will be more medium term than immediate.

The Westminster rumour mill propounds the view that the Treasury are not happy about the policy change and, whilst it may feature in the autumn budget, the full detail is unlikely to be in place.

For momentum to be achieved, it will be important that it is considered before next year’s spending review, although with Brexit dominating the agenda that is perhaps unlikely.

The warning note, therefore, is that the country and economy could be in a different place post-Brexit and there aren’t too many who would bet heavily on Teresa May remaining prime minister far beyond that point.

There are, of course, those in her party who do not believe in social rent housing and Boris Johnson used his speech earlier in the week to advocate home ownership as the priority.

Cumulative effect

Overall, however, there should be genuine reason for optimism as the quiet dropping in the summer of several policies such as the forced sale of higher value stock, scrapping the end of lifetime tenancies and the local housing authority cap on social benefit.

When viewed alongside the earlier reverses on the housing benefit cap on under-21s, “pay-to-stay” and starter homes, it is clear that there is a continuing move towards social and affordable housing as an important political tool.

Things could be even better if the government could keep a housing minister in place for a reasonable period of time.

One of the key things the prime minister’s announcement has done is to pass some of the burden of expectation to local authorities, much as she did with housing associations at the recent National Housing Federation conference.


Housing & Regeneration Finance Summit
October 31st, 2018, London Stock Exchange
150+ finance professionals from councils, housing associations, investors & developers
Places still available on the dedicated TREASURY STREAM
How will removal of HRA cap impact development plans at your council?


Councils collectively have campaigned for the opportunity to build more social homes and now will they be expected to step up and deliver their share.

That expectation would be likely to be even higher in the event of a Labour government.

As a result, HRA business plans will need reconsidering and the risk appetite to develop will need to match those delivery expectations of the government.

What I would not want to see is an exaggerated shift to social rent homes at the significant expense of other options.

In almost every area, yes, we need more social rent homes – but there is also a need for alternative tenures.

Local housing policy would be far too narrow if it only considered social rent, private rent and private ownership as the available choices.

There remains a role, in both policy and investment terms, for a much broader offer including, amongst others, intermediate rent, shared ownership and rent to buy as part of the pathway towards home ownership.

Creating a broad mix of offers, as I wrote in the summer, also accelerates the build out of large developments, due to the different absorption rates, than is currently achieved in many cases, thus having a greater impact on the overall supply of additional homes.

Elephant in the room

The ending of the cap, combined with the use of council owned development companies and housing companies (which are different entities in both culture and purpose in my view), would enable local authorities to singlehandedly develop sites with the full range of tenures offered.

The development company could build all homes across the site funded by properties sold privately, the HRA for the social rent homes and one or more housing companies which would hold the affordable, shared ownership, private rented and other units.

Rather than signalling the end of housing and development companies, the announcement could result in a renewed focus and purpose on the role of each in increasing housing supply.

The government must therefore be urged not to intervene on such companies, especially as both add resource capacity to a sector which has always struggled for it and has seen it stripped back through the process of austerity.

The other issue finance directors will be considering is how to balance new homes under the potential borrowing freedom between the HRA and the housing company, where the return on investment typically flows back to the general fund.

In most councils, there has been a much greater pressure on general fund budgets and therefore there will remain a desire for income to flow there.

Whilst building more HRA homes will relieve the pressure on homelessness costs, developing homes via a housing company often achieves the same saving whilst offering an additional return to stem the much larger pressures in social care.

The most significant sticking now remains land.

For many local authorities, there simply isn’t the available land, or at least land in their ownership, to develop the number of homes they would want to.

A next step would therefore be to give councils the powers to assemble sites and for the government to take a much stronger position in requiring all public bodies to work collaboratively to develop land holdings.

Another of my regular comments is the great potential but thus far relatively limited impact of the One Public Estate programme, as it doesn’t have sufficient authority to push through its agenda.

The elephant in the room, in a number of different ways, remains Right to Buy (RTB).

One reason some councils have, at least subconsciously, been hesitant to build new council homes is the fear of rapidly losing their investment under the RTB legislation.

The latest Chartered Institute of Housing (CIH) analysis shows that the RTB policy is costing councils approximately £300m annually and in the region of 230,000 socially rented homes will be lost by 2020 based on the current trajectory.

As a result, the CIH have called upon the government to suspend RTB, and others have proposed a significant reduction in the level of discounts available, to protect both investment and stock levels.

The Right to Buy consultation paper launched in the summer offered some hope to councils in seeking views on increasing the period in which councils must use receipts to five years and the proportion that can fund development costs from 30% to 50%.

Both could, of course, be welcomed in adding freedoms to develop more homes when combined with the removal of the debt cap.

Overall, therefore, there are plenty of reasons to be optimistic and, for once in recent times when considering government policy on housing, not underwhelmed.

Jonathan Bunt is director at JB Financing

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Property investment and structural vs cyclical change 11th Jan, 2021
  • LGPS: Making net zero add up to something real 16th Sep, 2021
  • Treasury year in review: inflation, regulation, borrowing and investment ups and downs 9th Dec, 2021
  • Does local government need a new red flag system to signal looming financial crisis? 23rd Jun, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 6 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 6 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Northants mulls ‘capitalisation direction’ to tackle funding deficit
  • Next story Border to Coast appoints three fund managers to run UK equity mandate

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares