• Home
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Conference
  • TMS Links
  • Calendar
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Legal & General invests £100m in Sunderland regeneration project

    November 28, 2019

  • Somerset council invests in Devon industrial site

    November 28, 2019

  • Appeal Court backs Birmingham’s £19m sprinkler spending

    November 28, 2019

  • Border to Coast launches private credit offering

    November 28, 2019

  • Darlington estimates 17% annual return on proposed housing company

    November 28, 2019

  • Knowsley buys town centre land to kickstart regeneration

    November 28, 2019

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Jobs

West Berkshire ruling complicates development schemes

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Development
  • — 11 Dec, 2018

The recent Court of Appeal decision calls into question local authorities’ ability to enter development agreements without following public procurement rules, says Helen Randall

Is your authority about to embark on a regeneration scheme or a property development with a developer partner?

 If so, then a recent landmark decision by the Court of Appeal may affect your plans. 

This does not mean that you cannot proceed with your scheme, but it does mean that you will need to do so more carefully, particularly if you have assumed that the public procurement rules will not apply.

The case, Faraday DevelopmentLtd. v West Berkshire Council v St Modwen Developments Ltd. has caused quite a stir among procurement lawyers. 

This is because it is the first UK case to declare a contract ineffective and throws into question whether a “contracting authority” (such as a local authority, an NHS  trust or a housing association) can enter into a development agreement (DA) or as some (but not me) would argue, a s.106 agreement,without conducting a public procurement.

It also underlines the importance  of ensuring that your authority gets well-considered legal advice before assuming that a non-OJEU (Official Journal of the European Union) route is possible, especially if you want to avoid the risk of a court declaring that your DA is ineffective.

The case centres around West Berkshire’s plans to regenerate an Industrial Estate in Newbury.

West Berkshire owned much of the freehold to the estate and sought to bring new housing and employment zones to the area, whilst improving its income stream from the site. 

Faraday is a special purpose vehicle, which was set up in 2004 in order to assemble land within the estate for redevelopment – it holds long leases from West Berkshire for certain plots within the estate. 

In 2011, Faraday entered into a joint venture with Wilson Bowen (WBD) a subsidiary of Barratt Developments plc. 

WBD would acquire a 50% shareholding in Faraday and participate in the redevelopment of Faraday’s land.

 The parties also planned to collaborate should other land on the estate become available for redevelopment.

Faraday had secured planning permission for a mixed-use development on its land within the estate, after which it had negotiated with West Berkshire for new leases. 

As of April 2011, Faraday and West Berkshire had agreed heads of terms and drafted a lease. 

However, West Berkshire then ceased negotiations in July.

In early 2013, West Berkshire invited bids for the regeneration of the estate. 

WBD and another Barratt subsidiary made a joint bid to develop the land on the estate, in concert with Faraday. 

In return for including Faraday’s land in the bid at a reduced value, Faraday would develop flats on its own land and a proportion of the housing within the remainder of the estate. 

Ultimately, this bid was unsuccessful and by March 2014 West Berkshire had opted for a rival bid from St Modwen.

In August 2015,  West Berkshire published a Voluntary Transparency Notice (VTN) in the OJEU saying  that the deal was a land transaction and thus exempt from procurement.

West Berkshire subsequently entered into a DA with St Modwen on 4 September 2015.

Faraday lodged a judicial review claim on 20 November 2015 and got a redacted version of the DA on 10 December and then brought its procurement challenge on 8  January  2016.

What is ironic is that West Berkshire did in fact tender the opportunity involving a four-year non-OJEU bidding process.

This  leads one to wonder whether they might have been better off advertising the opportunity in the OJEU after all.  

The case considered the following questions:

Is a DA structured around an option for the developer to acquire the site (meaning obligations are contingent on acquisition, rather than immediately binding) a “public works contract”under procurement rules? 

Did West Berkshire act unlawfully in entering into the DA because it committed itself to entering into a public works contract without following procurement rules? 

Had the council deliberately and unlawfully avoided the procurement rules? 

Even if the DA was not a public works contract, was it a “public services contract” to which procurement rules also apply? 

Did the VTN work to stop the court declaring the contract ineffective?

Were St Modwen Developments Ltd too late to ask the court for another remedy (apart from a declaration of ineffectiveness)?

Lord Justice Lindblom delivered the e main judgement which held:

A contingent contract is not a public works contract until the option is exercised and the obligations are triggered and become binding. (BTW, most s.106 agreements are not caught by procurement rules)

West Berkshire had not acted unlawfully when it entered the contingent DA and had not deliberately avoided the procurement rules.

The VTN was not transparent enough to alert others to understand West Berkshire’s reasons for not procuring as the VTN stated the deal was an “exempt land transaction”.

This defect meant the VTN could not stop the court declaring the DA to be ineffective.

The 30 day challenge time limit for ineffectiveness declarations started to run when West Berkshire disclosed the DA  to St Modwen because before they saw the DA, St Modwen could not have known they had a claim.

Helen Randall is a partner at Trowers and Hamlins LLP

Get the Room 151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • OBR Forecast to Signal Increase in Bond Issuance 11 Nov, 2011
  • Richard Harbord Is this the end of outsourcing? 25 Jul, 2018
  • Beware the HRA/general fund transfer Beware the HRA/general fund transfer 20 Sep, 2013
  • Euroland deposits and loans, part 1 Euroland deposits and loans, part 1 12 Jan, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room 151 5 hours ago

    Doug McMurdo: LGPS, the Stewardship Code, good governance and protecting capital: I have spent the last decade leading Bedfordshire Pension Fund (BPF) as chairman of the pensions committee. We are facing many challenges, not least the reforms that the… dlvr.it/RKfJrD

    Room 151 5 hours ago

    Active managers still in the game: Under performance and high costs have given active management a bad press, some of it well deserved. But it appears to be on the brink of a renaissance with some[...] dlvr.it/RKfJjR pic.twitter.com/yyAcm1wSMy

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Court ruling leaves councils facing compensation bills for water overcharging: Councils could face compensation costs running into the millions after the High Court ruled that a council unlawfully overcharged its tenants for supplying water from 2002,… dlvr.it/RKZnQK pic.twitter.com/tawdmA9wlE

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Election 2019: “Stark” differences in parties’ proposals for council funding: Conservative Party manifesto proposals would not meet rising costs faced by councils, while Labour Party policies would meet demand even with a council tax freeze, according to… dlvr.it/RKZnNT pic.twitter.com/F16kSfQrXI

    Room 151 2 days ago

    LGPS women discuss: climate & pension fund investing: Climate change has become one of the biggest issues for asset owners and managers as they move to tackle global warming. Room151 convened a roundtable of LGPS practitioners and advisers[...] dlvr.it/RKXsWW pic.twitter.com/3rtUTapwkF

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Interview: Doug Heron, CEO, Lothian Pension Fund: Doug Heron is heading towards marking one year at Lothian after making the switch from the world of fintech platforms to local government pensions. He talks to Room151 about core[...] dlvr.it/RKSQPK pic.twitter.com/ltHR6AS5gD

    Room 151 6 days ago

    LGPS and the climate change revolution: The pressure to integrate climate change thinking into LGPS asset management is growing. At the Room 151 LGPS Asset Allocation Forum, experts insisted climate be seen as a strategic issue[...] dlvr.it/RKK1cY pic.twitter.com/G87J33R4yS

    Room 151 6 days ago

    Conference chairs, ‘tree-hugging’ and overcharging pension investors: I have a story about two LGPS conferences, two conference chairs and an industry that appears to be changing for the better. I know, sounds like a real doozy, but[...] dlvr.it/RKK1Xy pic.twitter.com/6zYQFuuwAr

    Room 151 6 days ago

    Council feels financial squeeze on housing company pledge: The London Borough of Newham is set to approve a £113.1m funding package to support the latest phase of homes being developed by its wholly-owned housing company- but has admitted[...] dlvr.it/RKHwWy pic.twitter.com/jFrVeCWSw6

    Room 151 7 days ago

    Lack of benefits prompts shared services rethink: A major local authority shared services venture involving Northamptonshire County Council is to be restructured after it was revealed that a number of service areas were only included to boost[...] dlvr.it/RKDypl pic.twitter.com/f0R37mvCtP

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story 30 names handed to CPS over Northampton Borough Council loan
  • Next story UK domiciled funds may benefit from Brexit

© Copyright 2019 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK