• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

William Bourne: Will private equity remain attractive to LGPS?

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · LGPSi
  • — 13 May, 2020

The Covid-19 crisis has raised big questions for investment strategy in LGPS. William Bourne looks at the impact on private equity and its investors.

Over the last 20 years, allocations to private equity (PE) at many LGPS funds have tended to rise. Proponents have pointed to higher returns from the illiquidity premium, attractiveness relative to increasingly regulated public markets and its diversifier status as an “alternative”.

Opponents accuse the industry of relying on leverage and financial structuring, and focusing narrowly on shareholder returns. Some commentators have even called them the next Ponzi scheme, where the bondholders who provide the leverage are financing the exits of GPs (general partners who control the funds), while the LPs (limited partners who share in the rewards but have no control) are collateral damage.

The Covide-19 virus is bringing these issues to the fore. At a stroke a range of industries which PE is heavily invested in, such as retail, transport infrastructure and leisure activities, such as sports, have been temporarily closed.

Managers are also under pressure for accepting government money while paying out dividends or interest to themselves or related parties.

The immediate impact of the pandemic is that some underlying companies will run into financial trouble and be forced to default. That is essentially a problem for the private credit lenders who provide leverage to the PE industry, but GPs and LPs will not escape unscathed.

Some assets in their funds will be beyond saving and investors will lose the money invested; others will require extra finance to survive, and there will be hard negotiations as to who provides that and on what terms.

New finance

In the short term many funds will have a bank facility to cover sudden working capital needs. But sooner or later, unless there is a government bail out, they will need to raise finance from either lenders or their LPs.

In the public world, when a company needs refinancing in distressed circumstances, the equity holders bear the brunt of the loss. Bond holders sit higher in the debt hierarchy and often have covenants, or collateral, to protect their positions. In the world of private equity it may not be so simple.

This is because the relationship between PE and private credit is more symbiotic. The PE model relies on much higher leverage than public markets, on average some ten times higher, and some credit managers have made it their business to lend to private equity. They will not wish to negotiate too hard in order to maintain their relationships with PE GPs —indeed over the past few years lending has tended to be covenant “lite”, giving them less protection.

In practice GPs are likely to turn to LPs for new finance. However, if they make an unexpected call on LPs, the latter may in turn suffer cashflow problems.

Net cash inflow from PE in aggregate has declined in recent years and Covid-19 is likely to turn it negative, at least temporarily, with new calls exceeding distributions. If an LP defaults, there are provisions GPs can use, but they take time to implement and will not provide the immediate cash injections required. Some GPs are therefore already choosing to draw down commitments early.

On the other side of the picture there is some US$2.5tr of “dry powder”— money committed by LPs but not yet drawn down. Funds still able to invest have plenty of cash to pick up the distressed assets which are undoubtedly going to come loose as a result of the pandemic. But it will be a competitive market, so prices achieved may not be as attractive as some hope.

Returns

What about long-term returns to LPs and GPs? Experience is that the worst returns come from vintages several years before a recession or crisis, while those investing in the aftermath often post the best because they can pick up assets at attractive prices. Those already committed will see both a one-off hit from company failures and restructurings.

There will also be a longer-term effect because leverage will be less and borrowing more expensive. Across the cycle I’d expect returns to be around 2-3% lower than the recent “norm” of around 13-15%, sinking perhaps as low as 8-10% for the worst vintages.

For investors, a key question is whether PE really does provide excess returns, or diversification, over public equities to make up for the higher costs and fees, illiquidity and lack of transparency.

Academic evidence suggests not, because much of PE’s superior returns can be explained by the leverage they employ. The argument that PE provides diversification largely depends on the fact that PE is only valued once every six or 12 months, whereas public markets are marked daily. The return profile will differ in the short-term, but in the longer term they are driven by the same fundamental economic factors. The supposed diversification may well also be illusory.

Nimble

I don’t expect PE to disappear. Unlike a Ponzi scheme, even after Covid-19 most of the underlying assets will continue to have value. There is a case that GPs have geared up assets too much, but it is the bondholders and existing investors who are most at risk from this, not new ones.

On the positive side PE is an integral part of the investment taxonomy, nimble enough to benefit from the Covid-19 disruption and its very illiquidity attractive at times of stress.

I’d suggest the most likely long-term consequence of the pandemic is that investors will increasingly question the business model used by GPs, and particularly whether its high fee and cost structure can survive on lower returns.

William Bourne is principal of Linchpin Advisory Limited and has roles with five LGPS funds.

Share

You may also like...

  • Newham in danger of missing deadline to publish accounts Newham in danger of missing deadline to publish accounts 19 Apr, 2018
  • Learning curve: making LGPS pooling easier Learning curve: making LGPS pooling easier 11 Feb, 2019
  • Local Authority Treasurers’ Investment Forum 2012 Local Authority Treasurers’ Investment Forum 2012 13 Dec, 2011
  • CFO secrets: Revisiting ‘purpose’ helps ensure your finance function is fit for the job 11 Sep, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 2 days ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 2 days ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 3 days ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 4 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 4 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 5 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Community investment bond ‘builds engagement’ with residents
  • Next story Stephen Fitzgerald: Local government can emerge from the post-pandemic world transformed

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.