• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Inflation ‘biggest concern for LGPS professionals’

    May 20, 2022

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

William Bourne: Will private equity remain attractive to LGPS?

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · LGPS
  • — 13 May, 2020

The Covid-19 crisis has raised big questions for investment strategy in LGPS. William Bourne looks at the impact on private equity and its investors.

Over the last 20 years, allocations to private equity (PE) at many LGPS funds have tended to rise. Proponents have pointed to higher returns from the illiquidity premium, attractiveness relative to increasingly regulated public markets and its diversifier status as an “alternative”.

Opponents accuse the industry of relying on leverage and financial structuring, and focusing narrowly on shareholder returns. Some commentators have even called them the next Ponzi scheme, where the bondholders who provide the leverage are financing the exits of GPs (general partners who control the funds), while the LPs (limited partners who share in the rewards but have no control) are collateral damage.

The Covide-19 virus is bringing these issues to the fore. At a stroke a range of industries which PE is heavily invested in, such as retail, transport infrastructure and leisure activities, such as sports, have been temporarily closed.

Managers are also under pressure for accepting government money while paying out dividends or interest to themselves or related parties.

The immediate impact of the pandemic is that some underlying companies will run into financial trouble and be forced to default. That is essentially a problem for the private credit lenders who provide leverage to the PE industry, but GPs and LPs will not escape unscathed.

Some assets in their funds will be beyond saving and investors will lose the money invested; others will require extra finance to survive, and there will be hard negotiations as to who provides that and on what terms.

New finance

In the short term many funds will have a bank facility to cover sudden working capital needs. But sooner or later, unless there is a government bail out, they will need to raise finance from either lenders or their LPs.

In the public world, when a company needs refinancing in distressed circumstances, the equity holders bear the brunt of the loss. Bond holders sit higher in the debt hierarchy and often have covenants, or collateral, to protect their positions. In the world of private equity it may not be so simple.

This is because the relationship between PE and private credit is more symbiotic. The PE model relies on much higher leverage than public markets, on average some ten times higher, and some credit managers have made it their business to lend to private equity. They will not wish to negotiate too hard in order to maintain their relationships with PE GPs —indeed over the past few years lending has tended to be covenant “lite”, giving them less protection.

In practice GPs are likely to turn to LPs for new finance. However, if they make an unexpected call on LPs, the latter may in turn suffer cashflow problems.

Net cash inflow from PE in aggregate has declined in recent years and Covid-19 is likely to turn it negative, at least temporarily, with new calls exceeding distributions. If an LP defaults, there are provisions GPs can use, but they take time to implement and will not provide the immediate cash injections required. Some GPs are therefore already choosing to draw down commitments early.

On the other side of the picture there is some US$2.5tr of “dry powder”— money committed by LPs but not yet drawn down. Funds still able to invest have plenty of cash to pick up the distressed assets which are undoubtedly going to come loose as a result of the pandemic. But it will be a competitive market, so prices achieved may not be as attractive as some hope.

Returns

What about long-term returns to LPs and GPs? Experience is that the worst returns come from vintages several years before a recession or crisis, while those investing in the aftermath often post the best because they can pick up assets at attractive prices. Those already committed will see both a one-off hit from company failures and restructurings.

There will also be a longer-term effect because leverage will be less and borrowing more expensive. Across the cycle I’d expect returns to be around 2-3% lower than the recent “norm” of around 13-15%, sinking perhaps as low as 8-10% for the worst vintages.

For investors, a key question is whether PE really does provide excess returns, or diversification, over public equities to make up for the higher costs and fees, illiquidity and lack of transparency.

Academic evidence suggests not, because much of PE’s superior returns can be explained by the leverage they employ. The argument that PE provides diversification largely depends on the fact that PE is only valued once every six or 12 months, whereas public markets are marked daily. The return profile will differ in the short-term, but in the longer term they are driven by the same fundamental economic factors. The supposed diversification may well also be illusory.

Nimble

I don’t expect PE to disappear. Unlike a Ponzi scheme, even after Covid-19 most of the underlying assets will continue to have value. There is a case that GPs have geared up assets too much, but it is the bondholders and existing investors who are most at risk from this, not new ones.

On the positive side PE is an integral part of the investment taxonomy, nimble enough to benefit from the Covid-19 disruption and its very illiquidity attractive at times of stress.

I’d suggest the most likely long-term consequence of the pandemic is that investors will increasingly question the business model used by GPs, and particularly whether its high fee and cost structure can survive on lower returns.

William Bourne is principal of Linchpin Advisory Limited and has roles with five LGPS funds.

Share

You may also like...

  • Richard Harbord: ‘Effective governance’ the key to commercial activity 17th Aug, 2021
  • Economy: Inflation on the rise while the MPC sticks with ‘patient approach’ 28th Jul, 2021
  • Spending review set to push up council tax 18th Oct, 2021
  • 2021 treasury management survey underway 26th Aug, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    2022 LGPS valuations: difficult discussions in uncertain times: Michelle Doman looks at the impact of inflationary pressures, the war in Ukraine, climate risk and Covid-19 on employer contributions. At the start of 2022, for Local Government Pension… dlvr.it/SQlvy9 pic.twitter.com/Dd0lrHjWNb

    Room151 2 days ago

    Investing today: nowhere to hide: Partner Content: Alex Stanley from Ardea Investment Management suggests that investors have few places to hide amid a synchronised sell-off in both bonds and equities. However, there are catalysts that[...] dlvr.it/SQlNVC pic.twitter.com/KkGGnduzPL

    Room151 3 days ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 3 days ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 3 days ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 3 days ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 4 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 4 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 4 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 4 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 4 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 5 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Community investment bond ‘builds engagement’ with residents
  • Next story Stephen Fitzgerald: Local government can emerge from the post-pandemic world transformed

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares