• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Inflation ‘biggest concern for LGPS professionals’

    May 20, 2022

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Agent151: Nuclear chickens and the cost of caring for the elderly

0
  • by Agent 151
  • in Agent 151 · Blogs · Funding
  • — 8 Feb, 2017

Photo (cropped): Sento, CC

The nuclear family was created when society chose to move their elderly parents away from the family and into care homes. Agent151 argues that the nuclear chickens are now coming home to roost as we face stark choices about how to fund care for older people.

We have all known for ages that when the post-war baby boomers reach their twilight years it will be a major problem for the social care sector. The baby boomers’ sky-high expectations concerning living standards and overexposure to a popular culture of sex, drugs and rock and roll make one suspect they will be difficult customers in any case, compared to past generations; but the main issues are quite simply that there are loads of them and they are going to need care for a ruddy long time.

Attrition rates — the current euphemism for how quickly they die — have fallen thanks to whizzy medical technology. In the old days people were dying of heart attacks all the time, but nowadays they get a stent or a transplant or a pacemaker and, part human, part machine, whirr on well into their eighties; which is where lack of mobility and dementia make them expensive to care for. So, the effect of the population boom on social care costs is boosted by the effect of technology.

The baby boomers took to putting their elderly and needy relatives into institutions instead of caring for them at home, thereby inventing the nuclear family.  As an incredibly prosperous generation, they could afford it. Now the nuclear chickens are coming home to roost: the children spawned and educated in those nuclear families expect to put their own aged parents into those same institutions. The baby boomers will be getting a taste of their own unpleasant medicine.

Or at least, they would be if it were affordable. However, it is not. This is the case for a number of reasons: less economic growth, higher standard of living expectations, the continued pruning of public sector spending to manage the budget deficit, and a widespread unwillingness on the part of the next generation to shoulder the huge tax bill.

What shall we do, then, with this ticking time bomb of decrepitude?

Integration

The option of leaving social care where it is will result in severe financial pressure on councils, which will have to be funded by cuts to other services and council tax increases. The council tax social care precept is not enough on its own. This route will lead to referendums for big council tax increases, which will be voted down, and ultimately government intervention as councils rebel and abandon trying to balance their books.

The integration of social care with the health service has been touted as a solution. It is suggested that the efficiencies gained will pay for the increasing cost of care. Is this right? Well, the integration can only work one way, which is moving some or all of social care into health.

Local authorities are efficient and have been ruthlessly good at rationing social care for the elderly, whereas the NHS has a poor record on both counts. Making efficiency gains from the transfer may, frankly, be too big an ask for an already straining NHS. The likely effect will be an increase in costs. The twist with this solution, however, is that the pressure will be funded stoically by the taxpayer as just another element of the NHS overspend, and that may be an attractive solution politically.

Rations

Another, more marginal, opportunity is to ration even more stringently. Old age will become even less well supported — and let’s face it, the urine-soaked carpets of our care homes are a symbol of just how poorly supported it is already.  In addition, there will be an even tougher means-tested charging regime: the state will have to learn to suck the money away from the elderly more effectively than their greedy relatives.

Early intervention is also on the list of solutions, and whilst this is definitely something we should be deploying for today’s younger generations, for the baby boomers it is too late: the consequences of a lifetime of smoking and drinking and eating chips on the couch cannot be avoided now.

So, there is no silver bullet. Out of necessity, the solution will be cobbled together from all of the above, and it will not be pleasant. Perhaps the most important thing that needs to happen, and which is sadly the most unlikely, is the rebalancing of responsibility for care between the family and the state. The nuclear family could be replaced by the extended family, and caring for our elderly could become something that is highly valued, as it is in many other cultures around the world. Then no-one would need to worry about chickens any more.

Agent151 is a senior local authority finance director.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Complexity of treasury governance challenges for members and officers 13th Sep, 2021
  • Bereavement matters 20th Jul, 2021
  • How does LGPS identify “authentic” place-based impact opportunities? 9th Jun, 2021
  • Aligning financial and climate obligations within fixed income portfolios 29th Apr, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 21 hours ago

    2022 LGPS valuations: difficult discussions in uncertain times: Michelle Doman looks at the impact of inflationary pressures, the war in Ukraine, climate risk and Covid-19 on employer contributions. At the start of 2022, for Local Government Pension… dlvr.it/SQlvy9 pic.twitter.com/Dd0lrHjWNb

    Room151 24 hours ago

    Investing today: nowhere to hide: Partner Content: Alex Stanley from Ardea Investment Management suggests that investors have few places to hide amid a synchronised sell-off in both bonds and equities. However, there are catalysts that[...] dlvr.it/SQlNVC pic.twitter.com/KkGGnduzPL

    Room151 2 days ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 2 days ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 2 days ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 2 days ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 3 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 3 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 3 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 3 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 4 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Legal: The Teckal procurement exemption, the ECJ and essential activity tests
  • Next story Housing strategy reveals funding boost for planning departments

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares