• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Building Beautiful Commission seeks funding tweaks and tax breaks

0
  • by Jim Dunton
  • in 151 News · Funding · Resources
  • — 3 Feb, 2020

A government commission on architectural design has called for changes to the way public funding is used to aid new-home delivery plus business rates breaks to aid high street shops.

The Building Better, Building Beautiful Commission’s 100-plus final recommendations also included a demand for councils to appoint a cabinet member responsible for placemaking and a senior officer with the same responsibility.

3rd LATIF NORTH
March 25th, 2020, Manchester
Council treasury investment & borrowing

However, the government’s housing agency, Homes England, led by Nick Walkley, former chief executive at both Barnet and Haringey councils, came in for criticism for operating a land sale regime that failed to prioritise design quality.

Set up in 2018 with a wide-ranging remit to “tackle the challenge of poor quality design”, help build popular consent for new development and aid the nation’s struggling high streets, the commission’s final proposals were published last week and won support from housing secretary Robert Jenrick.

The key focus of the Living with Beauty report is the operation of the planning system: its headline recommendations involve ways that demonstrably good design founded on solid place-making principles can be embedded in the English development system and could even be fast-tracked through the process.

But it also examines the finance cogs that drive the development process. Recommendations include a proposal for a “Building Better Fund” that could redistribute development gains from more affluent parts of the country to not-so-well-off areas.

“In all measures of regeneration, we should remember that there is a great imbalance between different regions when it comes to the finance released by new development,” the report says.

“This is one reason why certain regions become left behind. Gains from development in the south east could be taxed by a Building Better Fund, to be redistributed to those regions, such as the north east, where the infrastructure needs for new developments and conscientious placemaking cannot be met from local receipts alone.”

The commission also suggests that the public sector should make long-term funding available to developers who achieve a “stewardship kitemark” that demonstrates a long-term commitment to schemes, in a similar manner of the great London estates.

It said that the fund could fill a gap in the market that would represent a new investment class and “might be administered nationally, although deployed in partnership with local authorities and Local Enterprise Partnerships”.

Additionally, the commission calls for the government to explore ways to even out tax discrepancies between long-term and short-term development approaches.

It said an expert commission should be set up to review options in more detail, working with HM Revenue and Customs, HM Treasury and MHCLG.

The commission said that in the longer term, ministers should look at reform of Section 123 of the Local Government Act 1972 – which covers local authorities’ powers to dispose of land – to end the legal obligation for councils to sell sites for “best consideration”.

The commission said that although the rules did not always mean councils could only sell land for the “maximum cash payment” they acted as a disincentive to long-term development models where public-sector land was in the mix.   

In terms of its remit to explore ways high streets can keep their vitality in a changing retail environment, the report suggested rebalancing the rating system to favour small shops.

“A good approach would be zero rating for single-outlet shops (or single in that settlement) below a certain size,” it says.

“A corollary for this would be an empty stores penalty, to encourage reoccupation.”

The report adds that supporting “less fragmented ownership” so that a more strategic approach to managing high streets became possible was also an important consideration.

In a highly critical section on Homes England, the report said the agency’s land-sale process was still failing to prioritise scheme quality over financial offers.

“This very urgently needs to change to ensure that the state is not effectively subsidising poor quality and ugly development, with insufficient focus on placemaking,” the report said.

In addition, trees “are very often omitted (or even taken out of schemes) due to local authority reluctance to take on the cost of planting and maintaining street trees”, the report said.

Housing secretary Robert Jenrick confirmed he was “interested” in the report’s proposals for a beauty fast-track.

“Where individuals and developers have put in the time to create proposals for well-designed buildings, which use high quality-materials and take account of their local setting, it can’t be right their planning applications are held up,” he said.

Jenrick also supported the call for millions of trees to be planted over the next five years.

He added in a speech launching the document that he wanted to be “the most pro-development secretary of state that this country has ever seen”.

Local Government Association planning lead David Renard said it was vital that the planning process was protected as part of the government’s response to the report, and that local communities had a say over their neighbourhoods.

“Planning departments also need to be properly resourced, and allowed to set their own planning fees, with taxpayers currently footing a £200m annual bill to cover the cost of processing applications,” he said.

“Planning is not a barrier to housebuilding with councils approving nine in 10 planning applications and are granting permission for more homes than are being built.”

County Councils Network housing and planning lead Philip Atkins said upper-tier authorities had a strong role to play in planning and place-making because they had the appropriate scale, outside city regions, to set the strategic vision to match new homes with necessary physical and social infrastructure.

“But shire areas they need the powers to enable them to set this strategic vision and to levy the funding required to deliver enabling infrastructure,” he said.

“This will be increasingly important if the government is to achieve its ambitions of levelling up the country and ensuring that everywhere feels the benefits of growth.”

Subscribe to our FREE newsletters…

Share

You may also like...

  • Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’ 20th Jun, 2022
  • How to be net zero by 2030 23rd Feb, 2022
  • Collaboration the key to district recovery post-pandemic 13th Apr, 2021
  • Impact Awards: A week to go before deadline 22nd Apr, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 1 day ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 3 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 1 week ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Pension bodies team up to create London housing and infrastructure investment super-fund
  • Next story A new Stewardship Code holds implications for LGPS

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares