• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Councils face more disclosures on their commercial property investments

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in Development · Funding
  • — 16 Nov, 2017

Photo: Pixabay, CC0

The government has released proposals demanding more disclosure from councils on their commercial property investments—while the threat of a Treasury ban on borrowing for non-local acquisitions still looms over the sector.

The DCLG has published its proposed update to the Local Authorities Investment Code and Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) Guidance to cover non-financial yield-bearing investments.

The consultation document comes in response to councils’ increasing desire to raise revenue from commercial activity due to shrinking grants and the low interest rate environment.

The document said: “The government does not want to discourage local authorities from investing to deliver local economic regeneration, even if this means taking on projects that the private sector may not consider.

“However, the government believes that local authorities need to be better at explaining ‘why’ not just ‘what’ they are doing with their investment activity.

“That means that the sector needs to demonstrate more transparency and openness and to make it easier for informed observers to understand how good governance and democratic accountability have been exercised.”

Paul Dossett, head of local government at accountancy firm Grant Thornton, said: “Putting a high requirement on the amount of information on why the council is making an investment is not necessarily a bad thing.

“But the extra scrutiny could make it easier for opposition councillors and local newspapers to claim the council is wasting taxpayers’ money. It will no longer be good enough to just say we have had a financial adviser scrutinise the deal.”

Commercial investment changes

The guidance recommends councils outline the contribution that non-core investments make towards their core functions, including through the use of new quantitative indicators.

David Green, client adviser at treasury adviser Arlingclose, said: “It is interesting, at a time when CIPFA’s code revisions are attempting to reduce the amount of detail presented to members, that this seems to be going in the opposite direction.”

In addition, as trailed by Room151 in September, the government is proposing to extend the principle of security and liquidity over yields to non-financial assets.

The document also proposes requiring local authorities to disclose their dependence on commercial income to deliver statutory services.

It said: “The government is concerned that some local authorities may become overly dependent on commercial income as a source of revenue or delivering statutory services. Given the nature of assets that local authorities are investing in this could leave them exposed to macro-economic trends.”

Dossett said: “This is a slightly odd worry—the only reason a local authority would become too dependent on commercial income is if government decided to cut grants.”

Councils borrowing solely to raise income would also be required to disclose more information under one of the consultation proposals.

One senior sector figure said: “Taken together with the Prudential Code, this could restrict the ability of councils to borrow to make commercial investments. There is concern across the sector about this and whether it will restrict councils’ ability to make themselves financially sustainable.”

MRP restrictions

Proposed changes to the MRP guidance would change the definition of “prudent provision” for the borrowing which finances the acquisition of each asset.

Revised wording would require local authorities “to set MRP in a way that covers the gap between the Capital Financing Requirement and the amount of that requirement that is funded by income, grants and receipts”.

In addition, the government will ban the retrospective calculation of overpayments of MRP to be offset against annual charges.

It said: “The government has concerns that some local authorities have been changing methodologies, not because the change would better allow them to make prudent provision, but instead to reduce their annual charge and in some cases to allow them to defer payments into future years.”

Finally, the proposals would ban councils from setting “artificially long asset lives to reduce the annual charge for MRP. It would therefore introduce a maximum useful economic life of 50 years for freehold land and 40 years for other assets.

Stephen Sheen, managing director of technical accounting consultancy Ichabod’s Industries, said: “This seems to ride roughshod over the idea that councils can be trusted to make prudent judgements about the useful life of their assets.

“40 years is far too short for some authorities investing in infrastructure projects such as road tunnels which will last for 100 years or more. These are judgments councils should be trusted to make.”

Budget worries

Despite the release of the consultation, the sector is still bracing itself for an announcement in next week’s budget restricting councils’ ability to borrow from the Public Works Loan Board to fund commercial property investment.

Green said: “The release of this consultation does not in any way preclude the chancellor from announcing restrictions on council borrowing to fund property investment elsewhere in the country.”

One senior figure in the local authority finance world said: “It feels strange to publish this just 10 days before the budget if the Treasury is going to put out something else; but such dislocation is not unheard of – it has happened before.”

An LGA spokesperson said: “Councils have been encouraged to fund ways of protecting services by generating income from alternative sources to replace lost central government funding.

“For many councils, the income from their investments, which have been made prudently, have enabled them to protect services.

“Councils must be able to continue to make prudent investments that are of benefit to their areas and any moves to restrict would be unnecessary and unwelcome.”

The consultation, open until 22 December, also asks for opinion about whether the changes should be introduced for the start of the 2018/19 financial year.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Impact Awards: Finance helps launch school meals company and support business during lockdown 1st Apr, 2021
  • Mike Thatcher: constructing a new role for local government 27th Jan, 2022
  • Impact Awards: Finance teams are the heart of ‘better outcomes and resilient’ place settings 7th May, 2021
  • Spending review prompts more calls for long-term funding answers 13th Dec, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 10 hours ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 11 hours ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 12 hours ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 12 hours ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 16 hours ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 2 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

    Room151 6 days ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 7 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 7 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 1 week ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 1 week ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Statutory override for pooled investments in the balance as IFRS9 adoption approved
  • Next story News Roundup: Northamptonshire’s ‘failure to secure value for money’, Brent appoints LPP, climate change guidance

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares