• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Inflation ‘biggest concern for LGPS professionals’

    May 20, 2022

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Crunch time: Building a ‘robust and adequate’ budget

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Funding · Resources
  • — 3 Mar, 2020
Photo: StockSnap, Pixabay, CC0

It’s budget time for local government and CFOs across the country are wrestling with their statutory responsibilities. Andrew Hardingham writes that in the end it comes down to looking at the requirements and then making a judgement.

It is the time of year when local government CFOs are turning their minds to the annual challenge of reporting to their councils whether their budgets are robust and the reserves are adequate.

Section 25(1) of the Local Government Act, 2003, requires the chief finance officer (section 151 officer under the Local Government Act 1972) to report to the council when setting the council tax on the robustness of the estimates in the budget and the adequacy of the proposed reserves.

Before we can do this, we need to understand what being “robust and adequate” means.

Definitions

Turning to the Cambridge Dictionary, robust is defined as “strong and unlikely to break or fail”.

Keep in touch – register for Room151 treasury and finance meetings ONLINE

Looking at my council’s budget, 45% of the net budget is allocated to provide care services to adults (the biggest proportion by far), whilst 20% is allocated to provide services to children, young people and families.

Each of the last three years, my council has failed to contain the unprecedented cost increases within its children’s budget by 12%, 19% and 15% respectively. Was it right, therefore, to say the children’s service budget was robust?

To answer that we have to look at the quantum of children in care and their circumstances.

The analysis of the number suggested that volumes were staying fairly static but average costs were rising. In my council’s case, increases were mainly driven by a few exceptional high cost cases: children with extremely challenging needs demanding round the clock care.

Let us do the maths: £10,000 per week for one child equates to £500,000 per annum. The equivalent generated from a 0.5% council tax increase. Two children would account for the maximum allowable tax increase. Or, expressed a different way, 120,000 residents contributing to the needs of two children.

Questions

Two questions arise. Firstly, could this be foreseen? Well, probably not. At the time of setting the budget the plans were reviewed and considered “sound”. Was the budget “strong”? Probably, but with the benefit of hindsight not “unlikely to break or fail”.

The second question (which leads to a completely different debate): Is this right? Is it right that such a high proportion of council tax income goes towards funding the needs of so few?

Maybe such a scenario is why councils are being forced to look for opportunities to raise income from “commercial sources”.

Local authorities now have the powers to do what the reasonable person would do. As finance directors, we try to be prudent but we also try to facilitate financing options to allow services to be delivered.

Purchasing an asset for regeneration purposes (in accordance with the local plan) that happens to generate a rate of return after costs and provisions seems sensible business to me, thus helping to underwrite the budget.

Reserves

Turning to the issue of “adequate reserves” is, maybe, more challenging. What is adequate? Our trusted source, the Cambridge Dictionary, suggests “enough or satisfactory for a particular purpose”.

What is, therefore, the purpose of reserves? Many councils will, in a prudent way, set aside or earmark funds for future projects—good, sensible financial planning. They will also receive grants and other external funds to be used for specific purposes and, from time to time, set these aside in reserves. They will also make provision for bad debt. Housing authorities will probably have large reserves derived from capital receipts set aside to repay debt. All of these will account for particular purposes.

Leaving that to one side, we are then left with the General Fund Working Balance (or whatever your council calls it). This is the rainy day fund that no one wants to dip into because, like all savings plans, once spent is not easy to replenish.

Back in the good old days of the Audit Commission, councils were encouraged to use their balances to finance budget plans with the aim of keeping taxes down. The figure of 5% of net budget appeared and soon became the benchmark for councils. But is this right? What does it mean?

Going back to our child care example, a few extreme cases may constitute a “rainy day”. Another example could be the unforeseen costs arising from Brexit. Is that a rainy day? What about sudden PWLB interest rate hikes? Is that a rainy day? How many rainy days do we have to allow for? We have the Bellwin scheme to fall back on, for emergencies, but there are rules before it can be accessed.

So, as CFOs we have to make judgements. We assess the risk, the balance of impact and likelihood, and try to keep the balances at an adequate level. Then we have to assure our elected members that all is well; we can survive another year or, to put it into audit language, we are a “going concern”.

Andrew Hardingham is service director for finance, finance, Plymouth City Council.

The views contained here are those of the author only.

Share

You may also like...

  • COP26 verdict: Pact underlines the role of ‘local communities’ in climate action 22nd Nov, 2021
  • Loans: The legal checklist for supporting enterprise 24th Sep, 2021
  • Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation? 8th Apr, 2021
  • Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions 11th May, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    2022 LGPS valuations: difficult discussions in uncertain times: Michelle Doman looks at the impact of inflationary pressures, the war in Ukraine, climate risk and Covid-19 on employer contributions. At the start of 2022, for Local Government Pension… dlvr.it/SQlvy9 pic.twitter.com/Dd0lrHjWNb

    Room151 2 days ago

    Investing today: nowhere to hide: Partner Content: Alex Stanley from Ardea Investment Management suggests that investors have few places to hide amid a synchronised sell-off in both bonds and equities. However, there are catalysts that[...] dlvr.it/SQlNVC pic.twitter.com/KkGGnduzPL

    Room151 3 days ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 3 days ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 3 days ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 3 days ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 4 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 4 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 4 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 4 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 4 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 5 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Uncertainty looms over future council funding despite £2.9bn boost
  • Next story Coronavirus: Preparing your council for the crisis

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares