• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • London CIV appoints Dean Bowden as CEO

    August 18, 2022

  • Coventry secures over £115m of funding to decarbonise transport system

    August 18, 2022

  • Bexley Pension Fund appoints responsible investment consultant

    August 17, 2022

  • Leeds’ £120m levelling up bids offers ‘transformational change’

    August 16, 2022

  • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’

    August 15, 2022

  • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override

    August 12, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Kenrick orders freeze on multi-million pound scrapping of local plan

0
  • by Jim Dunton
  • in 151 News · Funding
  • — 10 Oct, 2019

Councillors in South Oxfordshire are have been ordered not to take the district’s spatial plan back to the drawing board amid warnings the move could jeopardise hundreds of millions of pounds in government infrastructure funding for the county.

Cabinet members at the district last week recommended the council withdraw its Local Plan 2034 blueprint for the area’s development from the examination process so that new-homes figures can be revised downwards and more emphasis placed on sustainability.

However, housing secretary Robert Jenrick this week intervened to issue a holding direction preventing the council’s cabinet from endorsing the move at a meeting that was due to be held today.

SAVE THE DATE – LATIF NORTH
March 25th, 2020, Manchester
Council treasury investment & borrowing

In a letter to the council, Jenrick said: “I hereby direct South Oxfordshire District Council not to take any step in connection with the adoption of the plan, while I consider the matter further.”

The order will remain in force until further notice from the secretary of state.

Moves to scrap the plan followed a change of political leadership at the council from Conservative to Liberal Democrat and Green control in May’s elections. The plan withdrawal is tabled for approval at a full-council meeting later this week.

But a report to cabinet members earlier this month said not proceeding with the housing delivery plans and other measures set out in the Local Plan 2034 could place a question mark over £218m in government Housing Infrastructure Fund (HIF) support secured by Oxfordshire County Council in March.

The deal relates to a selection of infrastructure projects in the South Oxfordshire and the neighbouring Vale of White Horse district.

South Oxfordshire head of planning Emma Baker said a separate county-wide £215m Housing and Growth Deal signed with the government last year, seeking to support the delivery of 100,000 new homes by 2031, would also be at risk if the district’s Local Plan 2034 was withdrawn.

She said the district and Oxford City Council had been required to submit their local plans for examination by April this year as part of the deal, and that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government was clear about the link between progressing local plans and unlocking funding.

Baker’s report said a letter from secretary of state for housing Robert Jenrick to South Oxfordshire council leader Sue Cooper last month had set out the view that HIF support was “contingent on identified sites coming forward in an adopted local plan” and progress was expected for funding to be accessed.

In relation to the growth deal, Jenrick said: “Should local decisions undermine that framework, the government would be less inclined to provide local infrastructure funding, both now and in the future.”

Baker’s 3 October report to cabinet said that if the government chose to withdraw its HIF funding, Oxfordshire County Council could face abortive costs of £1m in addition to the loss of the £218m.

She added the potential loss of funding associated with the growth deal would be “approximately £145m over the remaining three years”, close-on £60m of which could be infrastructure funding for Vale of White Horse’s planned 4,450-home Valley Park neighbourhood in Didcot.

At their meeting today, South Oxfordshire councillors had been expected to be asked to support withdrawing the Local Plan 2034 so that work can start on an “ambitious” new vision, which has less “excessive” new-homes projections.

The cabinet motion says the current housing target is 5,000 units higher than the district’s identified need while the plan also calls for the release of too much Green Belt land.

Additionally, the motion nodded to the potential funding implications of the decision and calls for MHCLG to be asked to provide financial support for the new local plan, and for other funding opportunities to be explored.

Council leader Cooper said she and her cabinet colleagues had studied detailed matters related to the current draft plan “long and hard over the past few months” and had chosen to make a “clear, decisive and strong” recommendation on the future.

“In making this recommendation, my cabinet has sought to do the right thing, not the easy thing, and we will continue to work positively and constructively in the best interests of all South Oxfordshire residents while also tacking the climate emergency, which we have an enormous responsibility to address,” she said.

The motion also called for revenue expenditure estimated at £2m to be brought forward into the authority’s next medium-term financial plan period to support the creation of a new local plan.

The Room151 Weekly Newsletter covers local government treasury and pension investment, funding, development, resources and technical finance. Register here. 

The LGPS Quarterly Briefing focuses purely on pension fund investment. Register here.

Share

You may also like...

  • Funding reforms pose a ‘threat’ to financial planning while some councils benefit 28th Jan, 2021
  • Levelling-up should be ‘rural-proofed’, says West Lindsey CEO 24th Feb, 2022
  • A “proper” transitional system could improve funding predicatability 21st Apr, 2021
  • Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’ 20th Jun, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • London CIV appoints Dean Bowden as CEO
    • Coventry secures over £115m of funding to decarbonise transport system
    • Bexley Pension Fund appoints responsible investment consultant
    • Leeds’ £120m levelling up bids offers ‘transformational change’
    • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 9 hours ago

    Liverpool faces further government intervention as commissioners find ‘whole-council failure’: The levelling up secretary has announced that he is “minded to” expand intervention at Liverpool City Council by transferring the authority’s financial… dlvr.it/SWvgGc pic.twitter.com/cB7YeHZ9lE

    Room151 1 day ago

    Recovery position: withholding tax and the LGPS: Partner Content: Paul Sprenger from WTax talks to Room151 about how Local Government Pension Scheme funds could be missing out on millions of pounds of withholding tax recovery opportunities.… dlvr.it/SWsTfQ pic.twitter.com/z6aVMcaqHe

    Room151 1 day ago

    Treasurer societies favour permanent extension to IFRS 9 statutory override: Two treasurer society presidents have indicated their preference for the current five-year IFRS 9 statutory override to be made permanent following the government’s latest… dlvr.it/SWr3G4 pic.twitter.com/MGf9M5zC8Q

    Room151 2 days ago

    Luton Borough Council faces ‘grave’ £10m overspend: Luton Borough Council faces a £10m overspend in its 2022/23 budget which poses a “serious risk” to the authority’s financial sustainability. A report by Dev Gopal, director of finance, revenues[...] dlvr.it/SWmynD pic.twitter.com/ETDd7sQA48

    Room151 3 days ago

    Luton Borough Council faces ‘grave’ £10m overspend: Luton Borough Council faces a £10m overspend in its 2022/23 budget which poses a “serious risk” to the authority’s financial sustainability. room151.co.uk/funding/luton-… pic.twitter.com/XvyTZckW6m

    Room151 1 week ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 1 week ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 1 week ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Market makers to step into PWLB financing vacuum
  • Next story Queen’s Speech trails legislation on social care and devolution

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares