• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Local government reorganisation: The debate is intense but is the case for reform proven?

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Funding
  • — 24 Sep, 2020

A white paper on local government devolution and reorgnisation may be delayed until next year but that doesn’t mean the argument isn’t white hot. We asked a panel of experts to offer their views.

Surrey CC council chamber. Photo: Surrey CC, Flickr.

Ruth Dixon and Thomas Elston

Local government re-organisaton is back in the news. A white paper from central government is due this autumn, and has already been pre-empted by a recent report by PwC for the County Councils Network. This argues that considerable savings could be made if district and county councils were to be amalgamated to form a single tier of unitary authorities.

Not for the first time, government is being told to merge councils in order to achieve economies of scale. And, not for the first time, there are reasons to be cautious.

Scale

The notion of economies of scale appears to be common sense—the bigger the better, as it were. But predicting the results of mergers and reorganisations is complex, and there is a long history of such reforms producing questionable results.
For example, a study of the English and Welsh local councils that merged in 2009 found that “few of the desired financial outcomes were realized” by 2012. There are several reasons why scale economies are easier said than done.

Large organisations can be difficult to manage, swamped in red-tape, and slow to innovate. Research has also shown that the economic benefits of scaling-up are exhausted at relatively low levels.

For example, a 2017 study of property tax collection costs in the Netherlands found that efficiency was maximised for groups of about 30,000 dwellings—well below the average of over 45,000 dwellings in English district council areas.

Indeed, after decades of following the “bigger is better” logic, UK local authorities are now the largest in Europe by a long way. Going even further down this well-trodden path, as is now proposed, could result in high transition costs for little or no gain in efficiency.

Shared services

Under Eric Pickles, the government itself paid attention to these issues, pausing several in-progress council amalgamations and arguing for shared services instead. In 2012, the government published guidance, Fifty Ways to Save, which ranked shared services first out of 50 “sensible savings”.
In our recent research, we investigated the results of sharing back-office services. Could collaboration achieve the same or better outcomes as amalgamation, with far less disruption?

Unlike in the rest of Europe and the US, such collaboration had previously been rare in the UK. But by 2016 over 75% of English local authorities (including nearly 90% of district councils) took part in arrangements for sharing back-office administration (HR, audit, legal services, etc.) Contrary to expectations, however, we found no evidence of a relationship between the level of participation in shared back-office services and the change in relative administration costs from 2008 to 2016. (Data was drawn from the Local Government Association shared services dataset and the local government revenue expenditure and financing statistics published by MHCLG.)

This finding, surprising to many enthusiasts for the shared services approach, was robust to various statistical approaches, definitions of administration costs based on staff and/or non-staff categories, and to the separate analysis of upper- and lower-tier authorities.

Moreover, we also confirmed the results by investigating an analogous field of activity—council tax collection—where 22% of English district councils share tax collection services. Analysing just that type of council, again we found no significant relationship between participation in sharing arrangements and the change in council tax collection costs per dwelling.

Reasons

There are several reasons why councils which shared services performed no better than those that did not. Over the period of our study, councils were, on average, making substantial savings in back-office costs both in absolute terms and relative to total expenditure. Council tax collection costs per dwelling were also falling.

Thus, councils that were not sharing services were exploring other strategies for making savings. Those across-the-board savings were not restricted to larger councils. Indeed, district councils showed the greatest percentage decrease in administration costs and had the lowest unit costs of council tax collection during the period studied.

For councils that were sharing services, coordination and set-up costs may have been higher than expected. For example, ensuring that existing local entitlements to pensions and benefits are preserved may require a more “bespoke” IT system than predicted.

In conclusion, catch-all reforms rarely realise the predicted benefits. Shared services were presented as a viable, even more attractive, alternative to the kind of merger PwC is recommending. But even in that apparently straightforward case, collaboration produced no greater savings than going it alone.

Once again, economies of scale appear to represent a “phantom” promise of reform, beloved of those looking for a quick fix with an intuitive, if superficial, appeal.

Yet the outputs of multiple research projects suggest that, whether by amalgamation or by collaboration, economies of scale are much harder to achieve in practice than in theory within the already very large English council system. Instead, we suggest that reforms should be targeted to the local context and subject to public debate. The Covid crisis has highlighted the value of local responses. It is not clear that further consolidation would improve resilience, accountability or financial sustainability.

Ruth Dixon is a research fellow and Thomas Elston associate professor at the Blavatnik School of Government, Oxford University.

 

Peter Bingle

Local government faces a period of potentially radical change. The much anticipated devolution white paper promises a complete overhaul of local government structure. This is short hand for sweeping away the current two-tier structure outside our metropolitan areas and replacing it with large unitary councils run by directly elected mayors.

This isn’t the first time a Tory government has tried to tackle the two-tier structure. Lord Heseltine wanted to abolish county councils in the 1990s and was for the most part thwarted. The political mood is now very different. Counties are on the offensive and the districts face the very real possibility of abolition or merger.

The case for larger unitaries is overwhelming. So too is the case for directly elected mayors. For any reforms to be really effective and long lasting, however, the government needs to address two really fundamental issues. The first is the role of local government and the second is funding.

The sad truth is local government has been emasculated by successive governments of all political persuasions. It has very few real powers and acts for the most part as the implementer of government policies. Local councils are now also totally dependent on government funding. The funds raised from local businesses and residents is insignificant. Little wonder that turnout in local council elections is so low. What’s the point?

If the government is truly committed to a radical future, it will give local government real powers over health, transport and welfare. In addition, it will allow local councils to raise through local taxation a much more significant element of their revenues. Ministers will need to be brave. They rarely voluntarily give away political power!

The magical factor is the concept of directly elected mayors. The case for them has been brilliantly made by Andy Street in the West Midlands and Ben Houchen in the Tees Valley. High profile, charismatic and transformative. Contrast this with the average local council leader who is blessed with total anonymity.

For change to be effective, local government needs a new generation of political leadership. The old guard needs to be pensioned off. County wide unitary authorities must not simply be county councils run by the same bunch of politicians who nobody has ever heard of!

In normal times, local government structure would not be a political hot potato. These are anything but normal times. Combine the creation of large unitary authorities with a streamlined planning system and the potential ramifications for economic growth are enormous. This is a political prize so large that it completely justifies a political punch up with nimby Tory MPs and self-interested local councillors.

Change in local government is hurtling down the tracks. Will ministers have the courage to be really radical? The jury is still out.

Peter Bingle is founder of Terrapin Group, a former councillor at Wandsworth Council and a former chair of Bell Pottinger Public Relations.

 

Paul Swinney

At the last general election, the government committed to reforming England’s councils. This is certainly needed as the current system is long past its use by date and, in its current form, not fit for purpose.

A complicated patchwork of several hundred overlapping district, county, unitary and combined authorities cover England, as well as the Greater London Authority.

This causes two problems. The first is that most of these authorities have competing mandates and interests that makes the long-term strategic planning that places need to level up very difficult.

In Nottingham for example, a city of 678,000 people, there are nine separate authorities of three different types covering the city. This situation is in no way unique.

The second is the huge financial challenges of maintaining these overlapping authorities, particularly after a decade of austerity in city and town halls, makes the system unsustainable in the long run.

Tools and powers

Attempts to reform local government have been attempted in the past, most notably with the Redcliffe-Maud proposals from the late 1960s. They’ve mostly been shelved or watered down. But reform cannot wait any longer: We cannot help struggling parts of the country while their local councils lack the tools and powers to level them up.

Our recent report, Levelling Up Local Government in England, sets out detailed plans to reduce our 349 existing authorities with 69 unitary or combined authorities whose political boundaries match the economic areas that they cover. These authorities would be led by one directly elected leader with the mandate, powers and funding to level up their area.

In addition, we propose devolving significant economic and fiscal powers to these stronger councils. Everything from housing to bus franchising to adult education should be managed at the local level.

Discretion

And with any new powers must come greater fiscal responsibility. Councils should be granted control over council tax, business rates, sales and charges to allow them to raise and spend what they need to help their areas thrive. They should also be allowed more discretion in how they manage their budgets than the current fiscal rules allow.

With unemployment rising and businesses facing an uncertain future, many places across the country are struggling. Local government, with its detailed knowledge, is best placed to be the driver of their recovery.

The upcoming white paper now needs to give them the tools to act on this knowledge.

Paul Swinney is director of policy and research at Centre for Cities.

FREE monthly newsletters
Subscribe to Room151 Newsletters

Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
Sign up here with a .gov.uk email address

Room151 Webinars
Visit the Room151 channel

Share

You may also like...

  • 2012: risk assets up, charity down 2012: risk assets up, charity down 2 Jan, 2013
  • Officer outsourcing could save a small fortune Officer outsourcing could save a small fortune 17 Jul, 2013
  • Raising council tax: Where there’s goodwill there’s a way Raising council tax: Where there’s goodwill there’s a way 23 Jul, 2018
  • NAO calls on Whitehall to confront long-term funding of local government NAO calls on Whitehall to confront long-term funding of local government 8 Mar, 2018

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    Will new public procurement rules offer the best commercial results?: The government has issued a green paper on reforming procurement rules. Helen Randall and Rebecca Rees examine the proposals and argue they may not go far enough. The Cabinet… dlvr.it/Rqtw6T pic.twitter.com/9GiVTkL08U

    Room151 7 days ago

    The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk: Sponsored article: Lauren Sewell examines the prospects for long-term borrowing as Brexit settles and vaccines are deployed against Covid-19. On the 9th October 2019 Whitehall sent… dlvr.it/RqZXCr pic.twitter.com/PzgOZOGQ0k

    Room151 7 days ago

    ESG in liquidity: Sponsored article: Gavin Haywood looks at the integration of ESG in Federated Hermes’ money market funds. Federated Hermes has over 300 public sector clients invested in our AAA rated money[...] dlvr.it/RqZX5f pic.twitter.com/E87sBXsay8

    Room151 1 week ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 1 week ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 1 week ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 1 week ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 1 week ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 1 week ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 1 week ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 1 week ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 1 week ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

    Room151 1 month ago

    Room151’s top stories from a momentous year: 2020 was the year in which local government grappled with Covid-19, funding strains, controversy over borrowing rules and the threat of financial collapse. It has been an exhausting and historic[...] dlvr.it/RnlpZg pic.twitter.com/g3myNyox6J

    Room151 1 month ago

    Tracy Bingham: 2020, a year best forgotten but also one of learning: Many will rush to erase 2020 from their memories but, writes Tracy Bingham, there were also many lessons about finance teams, strategic planning and leadership. 2020: A year we’d… dlvr.it/RnlpY2 pic.twitter.com/m7G1krrtCu

    Room151 1 month ago

    Settlement must address ‘precarious’ local government finances: Dan Bates crosses his fingers for “no nasty surprises” in this week’s funding settlement but argues the “bigger prize” is post-Covid financial certainty. Thursday (17 December) should be the… dlvr.it/Rnj9dG pic.twitter.com/KLKjjuBqJE

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB consultation: Big change on the way but there are ‘grey areas’ and opportunities: The consultation on PWLB borrowing has concluded creating a new landscape for funding property acquisition. Our experts look at the implications. Tracie Langley The… dlvr.it/RndRvJ pic.twitter.com/KEqXEBmEfq

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Andrew Hardingham: FDs face endless demands but competence keeps them going
  • Next story Jackie Shute: Is your borrowing strategy a “no-brainer”?

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK