• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Queen’s Speech confirms planning reforms

    May 10, 2022

  • 18,000 affordable houses lost through ‘permitted development’

    May 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Richard Harbord: Cannock Chase reveals the risks in business rates appeals

0
  • by Richard Harbord
  • in Blogs · Funding · Richard Harbord
  • — 17 Feb, 2020

Amazon’s victory in a business rates appeal means one Staffordshire council will have to dip into reserves. Richard Harbord discusses the trouble with appeals.

The headlines about Cannock Chase District Council and the need to use its reserves to meet the outcome of a business rates appeal by Amazon, the world’s biggest retailer, underlines yet again that rateable values continue to be a major risk area for finance directors.

If it wasn’t for the huge amount of time and trouble that Brexit has absorbed, I suspect the matter would now be the subject of legislation although, it has to be said, some local authorities have reservations about new law and prefer to continue bearing responsibility for their own appeals.

Nevertheless, business rates appeals and the risk they present have been a long-running problem. Sadly, there seems to be no early solution in sight.

Risky

Business rates are a particularly risky part of local authority budgeting for two reasons. Firstly, an accurate forecast of the amounts involved in an appeal is impossible. Secondly, the date the appeal is resolved is impractical to judge.

And rates appeals are an unending topic of discussion. When I was a member of the Business Rates Retention Working Party we spent hours debating them and their implications.

Cannock Chase Council is not alone in hitting a problem. In fact, it is just one of many cases where local authorities have been faced with very large refunds on the back of a successful appeal. If a council has a number of high value assets under business rates, or even a single property, it is obviously vulnerable. Previous appeals have involved assets as large, and as significant, as power stations and airports.

Provisions

To recap on what is supposed to happen in the appeals process. On the 31st March each year each authority gets from the Valuation Office a list of outstanding appeals. The authority can then take a view on their outcome. There are various commercial firms who manage this well, as they can look at other cases resolved elsewhere, but the second part of this is to forecast when the appeal will be resolved. In recent years the backlog has been considerable and this has made planning difficult.

Once an estimated value of the appeal has been ascertained it should then be provided for in the balance sheet, this being part of having a legal balanced budget.

However, for some local authorities in recent years these figures have been extremely large with big implications: Including a big provision means increasing the savings needed elsewhere in the budget.

Many authorities have then taken a further view on the sums they should hold as a provision and are willing to risk a shortfall having to be met from reserves.

External audit—although it invariably asks how a provision has been arrived at—has not, in a majority of cases, raised queries on the adequacy or otherwise of provisions.

Although the provision minimises risks, the whole system is so uncertain that risk cannot be eradicated completely.

Solutions

During the time of the Business Rates Retention Working Party, central government suggested a number of possible solutions to resolve the issues surrounding appeals.

The first was that central government would meet losses on appeal where they are caused by an error on the part of the Valuation Office.

The working party rejected this for a number of reasons. The acceptance of central government funding would only be revealed retrospectively and so a provision would still be needed.

The other, more fundamental, objection was that the appeals process is not about errors but about a difference of judgement between different parties: One wishes to maximise value and the other minimise cost. It was felt, therefore, that the number of cases clearly meeting the definition of “error” might be few and far between.

The rejection of this option led to a further proposal to pool all losses on appeal and apportion them in some way to all authorities in the next financial year. As you might expect, local authorities were very split on this.

A number, dealing with a relatively low number of appeals, preferred to stick with the current system and make their own provision. Others, no doubt those with high value assets, would have gone for a pool system. That would mean every authority would pay something but it would have no link to their own business rates base. There would still be uncertainty but it would be minimised.

Mezzanines

In the event the legislation was never finalised and when the working party reconvenes the discussion will continue. In the meantime we have to accept the risky nature of the system.

There are other variables in the Cannock Chase example one that might provide a sequel. I understand that when the Valuation Office valued the premises they included a considerable value for mezzanine floors. On appeal the Valuation Office had to remove those values because the elements had included were movable platforms and not Mezzanine floors.

It’s possible the local authority will now be asking the Valuation Office to value these platforms as movable plant and machinery under the Plant and Machinery Orders, so eventually there may yet be a happier ending for Cannock council.

As for now , one advantage we have is that data from the current system will reveal whether the pattern of appeals has changed.

That said, I see little chance of speedy legislation to resolve the problem. We seem to have another year of everybody working on Brexit to work through.

Richard Harbord is former chief executive at Boston Borough Council.

Share

You may also like...

  • Economy: Inflation on the rise while the MPC sticks with ‘patient approach’ 28th Jul, 2021
  • Local authority bonds: Do they hold the answer to housing? 22nd Apr, 2021
  • Treasurers can expect low yields despite inflation spike 21st May, 2021
  • GameStop: A lesson for LGPS in the risks of short selling 8th Feb, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 5 hours ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 1 day ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 1 day ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 2 days ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 2 days ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 3 days ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

    Room151 4 days ago

    Rate rise represents ‘fastest increase in borrowing costs in 25 years’: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans analyses the rationale for the Bank of England’s latest rise in the Official Bank Rate and assesses the likely outcome of… dlvr.it/SQ33k3 pic.twitter.com/A81yiS1UgN

    Room151 4 days ago

    The Liability Benchmark, very much unloved at the recent Room151 treasury briefing, receives a much more positive assessment from Jackie Shute. There’s ‘no better tool for treasury portfolio management’, she says. #localgov #finance room151.co.uk/treasury/in-pr…

    Room151 4 days ago

    In praise of the Liability Benchmark: Jackie Shute responds to recent criticisms of the framework used to plan the future borrowing requirements of a local authority. I’m not suggesting that this debate will have the same[...] dlvr.it/SQ2cGf pic.twitter.com/4rqXTpHC9A

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story EXCLUSIVE: Bonds agency goes to market with £350m inaugural bond
  • Next story Audit questions Aberdeen’s income generation record

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares