• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Richard Harbord: Further signs that local government finance is failing

0
  • by Richard Harbord
  • in Blogs · Funding · Richard Harbord
  • — 7 Apr, 2021

Photo by MChe Lee on Unsplash

The crisis in Liverpool and a fix for education budgets are further indication that local government finance is in need of a root and branch review.

Even for those students of local government turbulence, the last few years will stand out as being significant. The concern must be: Where will it all end?

We all know that local authorities cannot continue as they are at present. That is to say, there are options for the future which are largely unpalatable and certainly do not fit with the innovative and exciting past. Due to a lack of resources and an unsatisfactory framework, local authorities are increasingly providers of statutory services only. And their ability to provide those adequately is under threat.



Austerity

Interestingly, the fabric of democracy depends to a greater extent on the qualities of people prepared to stand for election. In the past they have had real opportunities to add to, and change, their communities. As I have continually pointed out, councillors are not elected to close facilities and cut services.

However, throughout the period of austerity, it became obvious that there was no alternative but to trim and lose services, often those most valued by communities. On the grounds that this was likely to be a short-term problem, some authorities used reserves and muddled through. By the time it became obvious that it was a long-term scenario it was too late.

Thus, we have reached a point where we are no longer surprised at the problems faced. Hence, for the last few months, discussion has been around section 114 notices and a strong desire to minimise their use. Central government has agreed a number of capital financing directives to help local authorities maintain legal balanced budgets and continue to provide a level of service.

Signs

But in the last few weeks there has been new evidence of the difficulties of maintaining vital services with inadequate resource.

Firstly, there was the announcement that a small number of councils had negotiated a deal relating to historic higher needs deficits within the dedicated schools grant.

It was reported that the Department of Education had used £100m to write off their historic and accumulated deficits. In each case, it is reported, sums would be made available over periods of up to five years to reduce, or pay off, deficits in return for making reforms in SEND (special educational needs) services and meeting strict savings targets. It appears other authorities are contemplating a request for similar packages. The chair of the SEND system leadership board made it clear that each solution was the result of individual negotiation and it was certainly not a grant or “free cash”.

However welcome, the device cannot disguise the fact the current system for financing local government is failing. There needs to be a higher quantum and current increases in funding cannot disguise the fact that the system, as a whole, is not back to where is was before austerity.

More importantly there needs to be a root and branch review of the system for financing local government. It is interesting, even looking back a relatively short while, that the system of revenue support grants was dismantled to be replaced by devolution of business rates. this and fair funding which went with it, were never fully implemented.

In addition, of course, council tax has been allowed to whither away from the great hopes for it in 1991. In truth, hopes weren’t that great but council tax was seen as a better alternative than the short experiment with community charge. That said, council tax has never been given a chance. From the early days the increases year-on-year were subject to a “suggested” limit and the failure to update bandings or valuations left it impossible to understand by those who pay it.

Struggling

Sadly, the last few weeks has also brought another independent report and more indications that local government is struggling. This time on Liverpool City Council. The report was published after a best value inspection lead by Max Caller and focuses on serious failings in governance and practice in the services inspected.

It speaks of the “corporate blindness that failed to pick up” problems. The inspectors concluded that there can be no confidence that remedies and required decisions could be taken in a reasonable timescale. Therefore the recommendation was for the imposition of commissioners, supported by directions.

It is the latest in a line of sad reports about formerly well run and good authorities. Unless the whole system of financing and governance changes it will probably not be the last.

Richard Harbord is former chief executive at Boston Borough Council.

Photo by MChe Lee on Unsplash

—–

AWARDS INFORMATION

Read about the awards here.

Read about the seven categories here.

For submissions click here.

To read case studies of finance team impact, click here.

——

FREE monthly newsletters
Subscribe to Room151 Newsletters

Room151 Linkedin Community
Join here

Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
Sign up here with a .gov.uk email address

Room151 Webinars
Visit the Room151 channel

 

 

Share

You may also like...

  • Could 2021 be less eventful for LGPS, please? 3rd Mar, 2021
  • Building back better? 27th Apr, 2021
  • COP26 verdict: Pact underlines the role of ‘local communities’ in climate action 22nd Nov, 2021
  • The climate-impact: Why are green house gas emissions so important to LGPS? 21st Jul, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Impact Awards: Finance helps launch school meals company and support business during lockdown
  • Next story JOB ALERT: LPFA Finance Director vacancy

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK