• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

What does the 2019 Spending Review mean for councils?

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Funding
  • — 6 Mar, 2019

The Spending Review is unlikely to provide an end to austerity for councils, so the government must make its plans for local government clear, says Chris McNulty.

Ever since Theresa May’s party conference speech, government ministers have said that austerity – the period of government fiscal restraint since 2010 – is coming to an end. Last year’s Budget announced that real-terms day-to-day spending on most public services would, on average, increase by 1.2% annually between 2019/20 and 2023/24.

Austerity isn’t over for most public services

But much of this increase has already been earmarked for the NHS. While the NHS will receive a 3.4% annual increase in spending over the next five years, the Government’s plans suggest other public services will face real-terms spending cuts in this year’s Spending Review.  

Launched at a joint briefing with the Institute for Government, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) show that over half of total day-to-day spending that will be covered by the Spending Review is accounted for by the NHS, defence and international aid. For these three areas the government has already announced firm commitments to increase spending significantly in real terms. Other ‘unprotected’ public services – including locally delivered services, schools, prisons and the police – will be left with less. The IFS project that spending on these unprotected services will be 1.5% lower in real terms in 2023/24 than in 2019/20.

This implies continued austerity – albeit at a much slower pace than over the past eight years. Unprotected services will face cuts of 0.4% per year, less than the 3% annual average that unprotected public services have faced since 2010/11.

Discretionary council services are likely to feel the strain

If the government chooses to reduce all unprotected spending at the same rate, this will involve cuts to central grants for councils. The central government grant currently makes up on average three-fifths of English local authorities’ spending power. This varies significantly across areas, although the way grant money is distributed is likely to change with the Fair Funding Review. Unless topped up from elsewhere – such as through more rapid increases in council tax – cuts to central grants will mean that councils will have to deliver more for less.

If councils approach this round of cuts as they did the last, they will further concentrate spending on services which they have statutory obligations to provide – in particular, social care for children and adults.

Local services covered by fewer statutory obligations – such as libraries, waste collection, food standards and road maintenance – would likely see further reductions in spending. Day-to-day spending on non-social-care services fell by 32.6% in real terms between 2010/11 and 2016/17.

Councils absorbed some spending cuts by managing to deliver more for less. For example, food standards workers conducted 328 interventions – which include inspections, surveillance, sampling and intelligence gathering – each in 2017/18, more than double the number of interventions workers undertook in 2009/10.

But at the same time service users have been asked to shoulder more of the burden – whether through paying fees or giving up time through volunteering. As full-time staff numbers have been cut, the number of library volunteers has increased from 16,710 in 2009/10 to 47,982 in 2017/18. The number of local authorities charging for garden waste collection has risen from 88 to 199 since 2010/11 and in January 2018, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government allowed local authorities to increase the fees they charge for planning by 20% in nominal terms.

The government has options to mitigate pressures

The government could cushion the impact of any cuts in central grants by allowing councils to raise more money themselves.

The share of council revenue raised locally is increasing. In 2016/17, 40.4% of English council spending was raised locally – up from 25.2% in 2010/11. This looks set to continue. The Office for Budget Responsibility forecasts that local councils will increase locally raised revenues over the next five years as they continue to draw on their reserves and raise more revenue from council tax and business rates.

But councils are constrained in how much revenue they can raise. English councils are currently only able to retain 50% of business rates revenue, and there is a limit to how quickly they can raise revenues from business rates, which are linked to local economic growth. They cannot raise council tax by more than 3% each year without having to hold a referendum. And reserves can only be spent once.

One option would be for the chancellor to allow councils to increase council tax by more than 3% before having to hold a referendum. Northamptonshire County Council was granted an exception, after the Government allowed it to raise council tax by an additional 2% next year owing to its financial problems. In the absence of major tax devolution, it would not be surprising to see this offer extended to more councils.

The government must make its plans clear at the Spending Review

After a decade of austerity, the easiest efficiency savings have already been made, and choices are getting harder.

Successive governments’ choices over the last decade – cutting central grants and leaving councils more reliant on locally raised revenues – have meant that a broad base of local citizens and businesses are now paying primarily for narrowly targeted social care services. At the same time, universal services such as libraries have been cut back, creating the potential for rising resentment. It has also hit hardest those areas that happen to have relatively high demand for statutory services or a heavy reliance on income from the central grant.

This year’s Spending Review offers the chance to look at whether this is politically and financially viable. The government must use it to set out a clear vision of what services it expects local government to deliver, and explain how the settlement will allow them to do so.

Chris McNulty is researcher at the Institute for Government

Get the Room 151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • 2022 LGPS valuations: options, opportunities and objectives 31st Mar, 2022
  • 2022 is the year for confronting ‘chaos’ in audit and accounting 14th Dec, 2021
  • Finding private sector solutions to the housing crisis 16th Mar, 2022
  • Prudential Code: Are financial investments a case of ‘mistaken identity’? 21st Oct, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 6 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 6 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Known unknowns: questions the Fair Funding Review still needs to answer
  • Next story South Somerset expands its commercial property holdings

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares