• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Queen’s Speech confirms planning reforms

    May 10, 2022

  • 18,000 affordable houses lost through ‘permitted development’

    May 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

McCloud consultation ends with “greater security” for LGPS members

0
  • by Guest
  • in 151 News · LGPS
  • — 4 Mar, 2021

The government’s consultation on LGPS, Catherine McFadyen argues, closes with a decision which avoids forcing members to make choices that could be “financially disadvantageous”. But there is still much work ahead for funds.

During the reform of all public sector pension schemes (PSPS) in the first half of the 2010s, the UK government, in a deviation from the Hutton recommendations, agreed to introduce an element of transitional protection into the design of the new schemes. The format of the protections differed between PSPS. However, they were all uniform in applying the eligibility criteria—the protections would only be applicable to members who were:

  • active in the scheme as at 31 March 2012
  • within 10 years of their normal retirement age as at 1 April 2012.

Things start to get McCloud-y

In 2016-17, members of the Judicial and Firefighters’ Pension Schemes (including one member named McCloud) brought a claim of age discrimination against the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) due to the imposition of the transitional protections. The members contested that, by applying the protections only to those members within 10 years of retirement at March 2012, younger members of the scheme were at a disadvantage.

In July 2019, the legal battle ended when the Supreme Court refused to hear the government’s appeal. Government accepted that the protections put in place were discriminatory and committed to remedying the situation across all PSPS which implemented age-based transitional protections during the reform process.


 Join our Linkedin community 


Choose your umbrella

Over summer 2020, government sought views on proposals to address the unlawful discrimination arising from the transitional protections.

Government received 3,000+ responses to the consultation from interested parties with their views on the key issues. Earlier this month government published its response to the consultation dealing with how it intends to legislate to address the discrimination.

This consultation, and the remainder of this article, deals with the unfunded schemes only.

Due to differences in the way transitional protection was provided in the Local Government Pension Scheme in England and Wales, and the equivalent scheme in Scotland, a separate consultation was published on changes for those schemes.The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government will publish a response to the LGPS (England and Wales) consultation later this year.

Clearing the McClouds

We are pleased to see that the government has heeded the comments of respondents, including ourselves, who called for members to be allowed to make a benefit choice at retirement (the “deferred choice underpin”, DCU) rather than be forced to make an immediate election based on assumptions (the “immediate Choice underpin”, ICU).

The DCU approach provides greater security for members. Government recognised that requiring members to make an immediate choice risked more members, particularly those a long way from retirement, making a choice which ultimately turned out to be financially disadvantageous .

Government, however, ruled out the “anytime choice” option advocated by some respondents, where members could choose the point at which they made the decision about which benefits to take.

Government’s view was that this would be considerably more complex to administer, but more fundamentally would still incur the substantial risk that members make choices which ultimately turn out to be less beneficial.

What does this mean for administrators?

The administration impact of either option is considerable and consultation respondents were split on which would be more difficult to administer. 44% believed the DCU would have a greater administrative impact, vs 34% for ICU; 22% believed both options would have similarly adverse administrative impact.

It is, perhaps, the timing of the administration impact which causes this division. DCU avoids the administrative challenge of carrying out an immediate options exercise for three million members, but scheme administrators will be required to run two parallel sets of benefit design for the next 40 years.

The (eventual) end of the legacy schemes

Some respondents argued that all members should be able to retire in line with the pension arrangements as they were when they entered service, or argued that the new schemes are themselves unfair or discriminatory.

Government, predictably, has not entertained this view, noting that it is only the transition protections which have been found to be discriminatory not the new schemes.

The McCloud remedies therefore will not be extended to members joining PSPS after 31 March 2012, and legacy schemes will be closed in relation to service after 31 March 2022.

What happens now for the unfunded schemes?

There were a number of technical issues raised through the consultation process including abatement and transfers. Government will continue to work with (specific) schemes to address these further, given the complexity of the issues involved.

We now expect government to bring forward primary legislation on the basis set out above, including an implementation timeline extending to 1 October 2023. We can also expect further consultation, for each PSPS, on the detail of any necessary amendments required to scheme regulations. There is much work and detail to be sorted through, but we can eventually start to see the McClouds clearing.

Catherine McFadyen is head of LGPS consulting, Hymans Robertson.

 

FREE monthly newsletters
Subscribe to Room151 Newsletters

Room151 Linkedin Community
Join here

 Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
Sign up here with a .gov.uk email address

Room151 Webinars
Visit the Room151 channel

Share

You may also like...

  • ‘Major issue’ leading to delays in signing off council accounts 26th Apr, 2022
  • Avoiding the ‘flaw of averages’ in your LGPS actuarial valuation 5th Oct, 2021
  • Mike Thatcher: constructing a new role for local government 27th Jan, 2022
  • Councils ‘becoming more involved in direct delivery of housing’ 28th Feb, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 20 hours ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 2 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 2 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 3 days ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 3 days ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 4 days ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

    Room151 4 days ago

    Rate rise represents ‘fastest increase in borrowing costs in 25 years’: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans analyses the rationale for the Bank of England’s latest rise in the Official Bank Rate and assesses the likely outcome of… dlvr.it/SQ33k3 pic.twitter.com/A81yiS1UgN

    Room151 5 days ago

    The Liability Benchmark, very much unloved at the recent Room151 treasury briefing, receives a much more positive assessment from Jackie Shute. There’s ‘no better tool for treasury portfolio management’, she says. #localgov #finance room151.co.uk/treasury/in-pr…

    Room151 5 days ago

    In praise of the Liability Benchmark: Jackie Shute responds to recent criticisms of the framework used to plan the future borrowing requirements of a local authority. I’m not suggesting that this debate will have the same[...] dlvr.it/SQ2cGf pic.twitter.com/4rqXTpHC9A

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story ESG presents LGPS with investment innovation opportunities
  • Next story Budget 2021: A missed opportunity while bidding could prove a strain

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares