Shareholder v Client – the ignored debate in the LGPS governance framework

Paul Guilliotti, director of Financial Services for Richmond and Wandsworth Councils argues that, amid sweeping LGPS governance reforms, insufficient attention has been paid to protecting pension funds as clients of pools.

Please subscribe or upgrade your membership. To continue reading this article please sign in below or subscribe to our site.

The Government's Fit for the Future reforms have had the largest impact on investment governance in the history of the Scheme. The new framework

Shareholder v Client – the ignored debate in the LGPS governance framework

More from Paul Guilliotti

How discount rates shape the future of public pensions

LGPS Reports

LATIF 2026

Harness but don’t copy Manchesterism to make devolution work

More Reform-led councils consider LAPFF exit

Call to devolve £5bn in local taxes to mayors

LGR reaction, debt backlash and EFS worry: Room151 survey

LGR ‘pause and review’: the real story of what happened

More from LGPS

More Reform-led councils consider LAPFF exit

London CIV considers London Frontiers Fund

Reform UK sets out its plans for the LGPS

Room151 and Schroders launch fourth LGPS Investment Survey

Independent Governance Reviews – a missed opportunity

Keeping LGPS open to new members key to local investments

‘Better decision-making’: Mandy Kaur-Sadler shares her vision for the independent person role

More from LGPS

LGPS seeks clarity on Israel Palestine from new government

LGPS funds face recruitment challenges

How will the independent person role impact LGPS governance?

More from Paul Guilliotti

LGPS Reports

Most read in LGPS

More from LGPS

More from LGPS