• Home
  • About
  • 151 IMPACT AWARDS
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

Impact Awards –>
  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

The Pensions Regulator has spoken: LGPS is ‘high risk’ for governance and admin

0
  • by Guest
  • in LGPSi
  • — 22 Oct, 2019

A report has found that LGPS has failed to show the same rate of improvement in governance and administration as other public services schemes.

Given the new “clearer, quicker and tougher” approach of the Pensions Regulator, it is perhaps understandable why the announcement last year that the LGPS was a “high risk cohort” was greeted by some scheme stakeholders with a certain amount of unease and trepidation.

By way of background, LGPS scheme managers, along with those in other public service pension schemes, are required by the regulator to complete an annual governance and administration survey. The conclusion reached by the regulator is that the performance of the LGPS had plateaued and was not showing the same rate of improvement in governance and administration as other public service schemes.

Key risks

Despite the long-held view from many within the scheme that it is imprudent to compare a locally administered, multi-employer scheme like the LGPS with other centrally administered, single employer schemes in the public sector, the regulator was resolute in wanting to better understand the approach taken by LGPS scheme managers to a number of key risks.

With that in mind, the Regulator took the decision to engage with ten LGPS funds across the UK between October 2018 and July 2019.

The findings from the engagement with the ten LGPS scheme managers were published by the regulator on the 19th September.

Informal soundings taken from the regulator’s team during the engagement process had suggested that the intended outcome would be largely positive and constructive.

There are many elements of the report where this is the case, however, there are other instances where the report does not shy away from citing key risk areas where administration and governance in individual cases has found to be wanting against the standards set out in Code of Practice 14.

In these cases, the report helpfully makes reference to examples elsewhere in the scheme where such risks have been identified and mitigated.

Four improvements

The report’s executive summary identifies four key improvement areas. Firstly, key processes and procedures are not being documented with the risk that effective administration is put at risk when key staff leave. There is also a concern that scheme managers are too reliant on controls put in place by the parent local authority, for example, on cyber-risk policies.

Secondly, engagement with some local pension boards is less than ideal and some boards are meeting too infrequently and relying too much on summary papers rather than full documents.

Thirdly, scheme managers need to be more vigilant when it comes to protecting members from potential fraud and scams.

Finally, the report identifies considerable variation in the approaches taken by scheme managers when dealing with the risks surrounding scheme employers, such as receiving contributions and employer insolvency.

The main body of the report goes on to examine how LGPS scheme managers stack up against key elements of Code of Practice 14, for example, on record keeping, internal controls, good administration, member communication, internal dispute resolution procedure, local pension boards, employers and contributions, cyber security and internal fraud.

The regulator is keen to point out that the report is not an evaluation of any fund’s operation as a whole, nor is it to be considered as regulatory assurance or an endorsement of individual funds. The message appears to be that across the ten funds, there are examples where practice fell short of the prescribed standards of governance and administration and others where it has either been met or exceeded.

The report certainly offers a comprehensive range of practical help and guidance to assist scheme managers who judge themselves to be falling short of the standards of governance and administration covered by Code of Practice 14 and is therefore to be welcomed.

Local pension boards should also be encouraged to familiarise themselves with the findings of the report given their clear role to ensure that their scheme manager is compliant with Code of Practice 14 and other regulatory requirements.

Lessons

The next step for the scheme in England and Wales will be to prepare a detailed paper for consideration by the Scheme Advisory Board when it next meets on the 6th November.

There may be certain aspects of the report that the board may wish to question or to seek further explanation from the Regulator, but it is expected that much of the discussion will focus on the lessons to be learnt from the report and the extent to which there is a read-across to the work the Board is doing to improve the administration and governance of the scheme in England and Wales under the auspices of the Good Governance project.

Bob Holloway, is pensions secretary at the LGPS Scheme Advisory Board. These are his personal views.

Share

You may also like...

  • Do stellar returns mean LGPS has cracked the secret to being a good investor? Do stellar returns mean LGPS has cracked the secret to being a good investor? 1 Nov, 2017
  • What central bank policy can tell us about 2014 What central bank policy can tell us about 2014 9 Dec, 2013
  • Brunel launches £27.5bn LGPS pool with new CEO and CIO Brunel launches £27.5bn LGPS pool with new CEO and CIO 20 Jul, 2017
  • LGPS valuations place employer contributions under scrutiny LGPS valuations place employer contributions under scrutiny 9 Jun, 2016

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    Impact Awards: Liverpool’s cafe culture and Warrington’s investment in homes: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards showcase  finance teams with a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight Liverpool City Council’s… dlvr.it/RxJsKb pic.twitter.com/dEYpaz6HP0

    Room151 1 day ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for housing or regeneration? Check out the 'Place Shaping' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @31tenConsulting in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !! pic.twitter.com/dU99vE6Wws

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for Adult Social Care & Health? Check out the ASC&H category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by Fundamentum Social Housing REIT in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for the environment? Check out the 'carbon management' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @ACSLLP in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 2 days ago

    So what are the seven categories for the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards? Here they are room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… #localgov #finance #outcomes

    Room151 2 days ago

    Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation?: The impact of the coronavirus pandemic, lockdown and wider economic uncertainty created  deflationary pressures which raise important considerations for the Local Government Pension Scheme writes… dlvr.it/RxF7Fs pic.twitter.com/JlcjROBIpz

    Room151 3 days ago

    JOB ALERT: LPFA Finance Director vacancy: London Pensions Fund Authority Finance Director and s151 Officer Competitive salary and benefits The largest Local Government Pension (LGPS) provider in London with around £6.5 billion of assets and 135[...] dlvr.it/RxBdJP

    Room151 3 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Further signs that local government finance is failing: The crisis in Liverpool and a fix for education budgets are further indication that local government finance is in need of a root and branch review. Even for those students[...] dlvr.it/Rx9PSV pic.twitter.com/sAanC2gEyu

    Room151 1 week ago

    Impact Awards: Finance helps launch school meals company and support business during lockdown: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards will showcase the way finance teams have a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight… dlvr.it/RwnlF4 pic.twitter.com/AJhne1MVG4

    Room151 1 week ago

    "This work has made a vital, practical contribution to ensuring people have been supported through the pandemic." #impact #151awards #covid #s151 room151.co.uk/treasury/impac… #impactcasestudies #councilfinancemakesadifference

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ #passiton #localgov #s151 #151awards pic.twitter.com/A0uO0dwBkM

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Financial pressures loom for 2023 and beyond: Kate Ogden writes the government has addressed most of the short-term Covid-19 financial pressures facing English councils, but problems loom in 2022-23 and the years following. As we enter the[...] dlvr.it/RwfDsz pic.twitter.com/hpv2R09w75

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Calling all #localgov finance officers and #s151s room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ It's the #151Awards Thanks to the @LGALocalism for helping us get the word out along with all the LA treasury societies. pic.twitter.com/Nkal9BrH1J

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story 2019 LGPS valuations: The good, the bad and the ugly
  • Next story Chris Bilsland: Priorities of an NED inside LGPS

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.