• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Warren Buffett’s ESG scepticism: The reaction

0
  • by Guest
  • in LGPSi
  • — 11 Feb, 2020

At the end of last year Warren Buffett, one of the world’s foremost investors, said it was wrong for companies to impose their views of “doing good” on society. We asked three experts to give their views on the Sage of Omaha.

Subscribe for FREE to the LGPS Quarterly Briefing

Abbie Llewellyn-Waters, manager, Jupiter Global Sustainable Equities Fund

There has long been an unwavering view that the purpose of a corporation was to serve the interest of one primary stakeholder: the shareholders.

For the first time in World Economic Forum history, the 2020 top five global economic risks are all related to the environment. We can no longer separate the needs of key stakeholders. Indeed, three have become co-dependent: shareholders, the environment and society. The balance of these stakeholders will determine economic stability and ultimately corporate efficacy.

As the ever-warming planet struggles to cope with burgeoning populations and depletion of natural resource, the investment industry is beginning to re-evaluate how corporations can respond or indeed survive this new trajectory. This isn’t about moral arbitration as Warren Buffett suggests; this is risk management coupled with new opportunity.

After half a century of singular capitalism, there is growing collective realisation that regeneration is imperative for any form of capitalism to continue to prosper. Corporate success depends on stable foundations built on simple assumptions such as clean air, availability of water, basic needs which underpin social stability and ultimately economic productivity. Companies who do not manage their footprint with regards to these issues, are arguably not considering the long-term needs of their shareholders.

This isn’t about moral arbitration as Warren Buffett suggests; this is risk management coupled with new opportunity.

Abbie Llewellyn-Waters

Just take carbon as an example of an inevitable economic cost. If you want to manage an issue, then you have to start with measuring it. Governments are beginning to respond and we have seen regulation accelerate, with COP 26 in Glasgow in November acting as a potential catalyst for meaningful developments in multilateral policy agreements.

There is greater transparency enabled through the introduction of climate reporting such as the TCFD (Taskforce for Climate Related Financial Disclosure) which lays the groundwork to build carbon pricing mechanisms. Companies who have a higher carbon output than their peers are likely to have higher costs which will lead to a competitive disadvantage. Decarbonisation is inevitable and corporations who deliver on this will ultimately support all stakeholders, including the shareholder.

Investing in employee benefits, training, treating suppliers fairly and ethically, protecting the environment: These types of strategic considerations have fast become business critical, underpinning the fundamental resilience of shareholder return.

Neil Sellstrom, client services manager, Pirc

Warren Buffett’s views are always worth paying attention to, and what he has to say about responsible capitalism rings true, though we might draw different conclusions from it.

For example, it is certainly the case that companies are undertaking initiatives that contribute to both profitability and sustainability, but focus rather more on the latter aspect of their decision. We could say the same about many of the ESG investment products now available. Buffett is more straightforward about his interest in wind turbines. He is in it to make money, first and foremost.

It is also true that it can be hard for investors to identify the “good” companies, in terms of ESG performance. Aside from the fundamental question of how to accurately measure this type of performance, there are numerous examples of companies that might exhibit good practice in one area, but behave poorly in another.

We don’t think companies are trying to impose their views on society. Rather companies are seeking to respond to societal expectations of them.

Neil Sellstrom

We have seen a number of companies that make a significant environmental contribution but have some questionable workforce practices.

Finally, Buffett is right to say that some of the most difficult social and environmental questions that affect companies will ultimately have to be decided by government rather than by business.

In particular a decisive shift to a low-carbon economy requires government intervention in numerous areas. And for government to intervene, in turn requires democratic legitimacy, the public has to give its assent.

This last point highlights where we take a slightly different view. We don’t think companies are trying to impose their views on society. Rather companies are seeking to respond to societal expectations of them. Trust in business is low, and polling suggests that the public would like to see companies run in a way that takes account of social and environmental factors in addition to profit.

It is the public, the same people who both buy the products which companies produce and whose savings provide capital for their investment, that believe that many corporations have not behaved responsibly.

So companies’ social and environmental initiatives, as well as seeking to generate profit, are also a response to demand from both consumers and shareholders. That sounds like the sort of capitalism we all want to see.

Dr. Michael Viehs, head of ESG integration, international, at Federated Hermes

Taking environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into account can help companies achieve better financial outcomes. That is, in a nutshell, the reason why investors should not ignore relevant, idiosyncratic ESG information.

By taking ESG considerations into account when making investment decisions, we investors can make better decisions for our clients—and other stakeholders at the same time.

This is so because ESG information on companies can have a direct impact on—both over the short and, more importantly, long term—a company’s risk profile and profitability.

Let’s ask ourselves some practical questions. Why should consumer goods companies which look after and take good care of their employees and customers not be successful at the same time? Why should industrial companies which have appropriate environmental management systems and greenhouse gas emission reduction plans in place not be more successful and more resilient?

ESG is not just a trend. It is here to stay. Investors are increasingly asking questions about how their savings are being invested, and whether the companies they are investing in have a “social licence to operate”.

Michael Viehs

Companies that have invested in robust ESG policies tend to be more resilient to the impact of factors like tightening climate change regulation or supply chain risk. This results in a lower risk profile and greater growth opportunities over the long term, generating holistic returns for beneficiaries.

There is also a growing body of robust academic research suggesting that investors who take ESG into account when making investment decisions are not worse off. Rather the contrary is true: They tend to be, on average, better off. Much like financial risk, ESG considerations are simply another set of risk factors by which to assess a company.

ESG is not just a trend. It is here to stay. Investors are increasingly asking questions about how their savings are being invested, and whether the companies they are investing in have a “social licence to operate”.

The purpose of investment is to create wealth sustainably over the long term and through active stewardship and engagement, we can help companies achieve this, resulting in positive financial outcomes for investors and society as a whole.

Share

You may also like...

  • John Harrison: The future of active management in the LGPS John Harrison: The future of active management in the LGPS 19 Apr, 2017
  • China and commodities China and commodities 21 Mar, 2012
  • LGPS deficits rise LGPS deficits rise 19 Jun, 2014
  • Supreme Court ruling: No charter for LGPS boycotts 26 May, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 8 mins ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 8 mins ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 1 day ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 2 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 2 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 3 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 1 week ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Is local government funding “broken”?: Andrew Hardingham looks at the underlying issues that caused more than a third of respondents in the Room151/CCLA treasury survey to say that the funding system for local govenrment is[...] dlvr.it/RsYhsg pic.twitter.com/plNp7Ayys6

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Olympian task: Stepping up at Newham
  • Next story Shared service venture to create “finance academy” for managers

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK