• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Are central banks losing their independence?

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · LGPS · Treasury
  • — 17 Mar, 2021

Bank of England.

William Bourne argues central banks are “nothing like as independent as we are led to believe”.

We like to think of central banks as being independent. It is a solution to the problem of not wanting to give control of monetary levers to politicians. Gordon Brown famously released the Bank of England in his first budget in May 1997. Andy Haldane, a member of the Bank’s monetary policy committee, estimated in a recent speech  that 80-90% of central banks considered themselves independent.

Independence may be enshrined in the constitution: for example, Article 123 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the EU prohibits monetary financing, giving central banks some protection against politicians.

A 2016 ranking on the basis of legal protections put some (but not all) European countries such as Germany, France and Finland at the top with a 0.86 ranking, and Australia at the bottom with 0.25. The Bank of England was second quartile at 0.7, the Federal Reserve third at 0.48.

Authority and reputation

Real independence comes more from the central bank’s authority and reputation. Any constitution or law enshrining independence can be repealed but the effect of even an announcement to that effect would devastate market confidence. In that sense, there is undoubtedly a strong connection to broader political and social considerations. The Bundesbank is the prime example here.

Nor is the concept of independence black and white. Brown gave the Bank of England freedom to set interest rates, but central banks are given objectives and remits and their boards appointed largely by politicians. When central banks print money on the scale they have over the past ten years, and particularly the last 12 months, it is clearly a political act done in conjunction with government policy.

 


 Join our Linkedin community 


Central banks have three main functions: to maintain a stable financial system; to manage the exchange rate; and to fight inflation (or deflation). The first two have always been intertwined with government activities because of their immediate impact on people. Examples are the shifts in monetary policy on Black Monday in 1992, during the peak of the Global Financial Crisis in October 2008 or, more recently, in March 2020.

A broader fig-leaf of independence has perhaps covered the inflation-fighting and interest rate setting role. I am of the view that interest rates are in fact a function of market supply and demand, but others may believe that central banks do have some power and influence in this area and use it to fight inflation.

Fall guys

My point so far is that central banks are nothing like as independent as we are led to believe. The events of 2020 have certainly brought this into focus.

Current low bond yields can be considered a form of financial repression in that savers of all kinds who wish to borrow from governments do not get rewarded for the risk they take. In the case of negative interest rates, a government’s promise is supposedly worth more than cash under the bed.

However, low rates very nicely suit governments with large deficits to finance and they find ways of achieving that while allowing central banks a fig-leaf of independence.

Looking ahead, however, it is inevitable that at some point rates rise and governments will find it more expensive to refinance their debts. The chancellor has already hinted at the problems this will bring.

If financial instability or inflation hits, governments may find that central bank governors will make very convenient fall-guys. It will be an easy line to say that they have failed in their remits and independence has been a failure. As I have outlined, the truth will, of course, be different: central banks never had much independence and governments are fully involved, if not primarily responsible, for the failure.

Acid test

Does this matter to investors? It is quite clear that when we reach the end of the QE road there will be an unpleasant reckoning. It may come from inflation taking off, an inability to refinance if bond yields rise sharply or simply a good old-fashioned sterling crisis. At times of emergency even the semblance of central bank authority which ‘independence’ gives provides another weapon for authorities to use.

And central banks do have powers which they can use to close down activities temporarily, even the whole banking system if needed.

Ultimately, though, markets will call the shots, and governments or central banks can only put temporary stays on that impetus. That was quite apparent in the Global Financial Crisis when interest rates were driven down from 5% to nearly zero. In my view it will be true in the future whether central banks have nominal independence or not.

The question will be whether central banks have the clout to prevent governments taking damaging measures in a crisis. For example, would a future government be able to reimpose currency controls or could the Bank of England prevent them? That, for me, will be the acid test of independence.

William Bourne is principal of Linchpin Advisory Limited and has roles with five LGPS funds.

FREE monthly newsletters
Subscribe to Room151 Newsletters

Room151 Linkedin Community
Join here

Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
Sign up here with a .gov.uk email address

Room151 Webinars
Visit the Room151 channel

Share

You may also like...

  • LGPS funds seeking to divest from Russia 3rd Mar, 2022
  • Pension power: beyond net zero 4th Feb, 2022
  • Treasurers can expect low yields despite inflation spike 21st May, 2021
  • Hired, housed and heathy: An introduction to a social infrastructure strategy 29th Apr, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 23 mins ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

    Room151 4 days ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 5 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 5 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 6 days ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 6 days ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 1 week ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Budget 2021: A missed opportunity while bidding could prove a strain
  • Next story Local government investment balances rise as PWLB borrowing falls

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares